Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)  
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 635 times:

Hi all,

This one for done for grain just now.....

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...6817ra-85784_dme_131005_kn_302.jpg

I can see ever-so-slightly more noise than a regular side-on but:

a) this is from 2005.
b) this was very low, sunset light at ISO400, on a 350D.
c) this features an aircraft and scheme not well represented in the database.

It seems a bit picky to me, given the rarity.

Cheers,

Karl

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineNZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 6431 posts, RR: 38
Reply 1, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 635 times:

I probably would have said soft before grain, if anything.. Maybe another pass over the sky?


It's all about the destination AND the journey.
User currently offlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10036 posts, RR: 26
Reply 2, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 635 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting NZ107 (Reply 1):
Maybe another pass over the sky?

I see noise in the sky, but moreso in the shadows, like under the wing.

Karl, I'd probably submit that one at 1024. Also looks a bit soft and low on contrast.



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineJakTrax From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2005, 4936 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 635 times:

Vk, I'm not claiming it's noise-free, but for me it's negligible considering it's an older image of a rare aircraft.
Cheers,

Karl


User currently onlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4816 posts, RR: 25
Reply 4, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 13 hours ago) and read 635 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting JakTrax (Reply 3):
Vk, I'm not claiming it's noise-free, but for me it's negligible considering it's an older image of a rare aircraft.
Cheers,

Karl


Makes no difference to Airliners.net.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlinemjgbtv From United States of America, joined Jan 2008, 858 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 635 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 4):
Makes no difference to Airliners.net.

Per the rejection guide general notes:

1. "Images taken before the digital era (pre 2002 as a rough guideline) will be screened with more leniency..."
2. "Rare aircraft and new registrations will also be screened with more leniency."

But is this old and rare enough? I don't know.


User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 6, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 11 hours ago) and read 635 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 4):
Makes no difference to Airliners.net.

Not sure if you are referring to the amount of noise or the rarity, but if the latter that is absolutely not true. Older, rare, and in some cases new registrations have more lax standards applied to them.


Quoting mjgbtv (Reply 5):
But is this old and rare enough? I don't know.

2005 and 43 images already on the db, so no, it is not.


User currently onlineSilver1SWA From United States of America, joined Mar 2004, 4816 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 635 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting mjgbtv (Reply 5):
Quoting dlowwa (Reply 6):

Sorry, I'm on my iPhone and mistakenly quoted the wrong reply.

This is what I meant to quote...

Quoting JakTrax (Thread starter):
I can see ever-so-slightly more noise than a regular side-on but:

a) this is from 2005.
b) this was very low, sunset light at ISO400, on a 350D.
c) this features an aircraft and scheme not well represented in the database.

It seems a bit picky to me, given the rarity.

2005 isn't old enough.

Sun being low and shot at ISO 400 on an older camera doesn't matter to anet, I'm sure. We'd all like it to, but the when and how doesn't mean much to anet. Final result is what matters.

It's not the first photo of the aircraft in the DB.

Hope that clears it up.



ALL views, opinions expressed are mine ONLY and are NOT representative of those shared by Southwest Airlines Co.
User currently offlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7328 posts, RR: 30
Reply 8, posted (1 year 10 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 635 times:

Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 7):
Sorry, I'm on my iPhone and mistakenly quoted the wrong reply.
Quoting Silver1SWA (Reply 7):
Sun being low and shot at ISO 400 on an older camera doesn't matter to anet, I'm sure. We'd all like it to, but the when and how doesn't mean much to anet. Final result is what matters.

Ok, that makes a lot more sense  , and you're about right with that.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Post-screening - Grain (JakTrax)
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format