dazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2804 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 700 times:
I think this is one that might technically be level, but it doesn't look like it. I can see why the screener has commented CW needed. Visually, it does look like it leans to the left. A little CW will help to balance it I feel. Did you use the roofline of the building in the background as reference? That is perfectly level, but the verticals on the building still suggest it needs a little CW and the aircraft does look a little unlevel. Maybe 0.15 or 0.25 degrees CW and you should be sorted.
Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
vposbic From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 64 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (1 year 3 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 700 times:
I quickly did a check in PS by running straight lines from mirrored aircraft elements (e.g. the engine spinners & tips of the horizontal stabilizer) and the left side is indeed low, requiring CW rotation. Check it out yourself, or I can upload the image with the lines if you'd like. Hope this helps! Great photo nonetheless, hope it gets accepted.