Sponsor Message:
Aviation Photography Feedback Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Post Screening Help MD80  
User currently offlinemonsoon84 From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 53 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 months 4 hours ago) and read 682 times:

This photo was rejected for being overexposed and soft.

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...120_x1352846501.6141dsc_0114v4.jpg

After edit..

http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...eady/r1353535675.969dsc_0114v5.jpg

How does it look now? Any help would be great.  


Thanks,
Monsoon84

[Edited 2012-11-21 14:30:04]

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDL747 From United States of America, joined Nov 2012, 273 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 months 4 hours ago) and read 672 times:

Looks better, but I still think it has severe quality issues.


Just like the shirt says, Boeing Builds It Better!
User currently offlinedazbo5 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2005, 2572 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (6 months 3 hours ago) and read 671 times:

Quoting monsoon84 (Thread starter):
How does it look now?

It looks like the original was a little blurry so I don't think this will have the quaity to recover it. It's still borderline overexposed and doesn't have the quality. It looks like you've had to apply a lot of sharpening to compensate, particularly towards the front of the aircraft, but it's still soft and oversharpened.

Darren


Equipment: 2x Canon EOS 50D; Sigma 10-20 EX DC HSM, 50-500 EX APO DG, Canon 24-105 f/4 L, Speedlite 430EX
User currently offlinemonsoon84 From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (5 months 4 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 645 times:

Ok thanks for the feed back...
I have one more question.

Will this photo be rejected due to the red FOD can?
http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/b...ready/d1353569641.28dsc_0199v1.jpg


Thanks,
Monsoon84

User currently onlinevikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 8208 posts, RR: 28
Reply 4, posted (5 months 4 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 642 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
PHOTO SCREENER

Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 3):
Will this photo be rejected due to the red FOD can?

I don't think so, given that it looks like a pretty unavoidable obstruction, but I'm not positive.

However, the photo looks soft, a bit dark, and low on contrast.


"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlinemonsoon84 From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (5 months 4 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 619 times:

Do you think the photo is salvageable if i sharpen, and increase the contrast?

Thanks,
Monsoon84

User currently onlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7238 posts, RR: 32
Reply 6, posted (5 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 602 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 5):
Do you think the photo is salvageable

With a better edit, it might have a chance.

User currently offlinemonsoon84 From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (5 months 3 weeks 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 558 times:

I worked on fixing it. What do you think about the contrast and sharpness?

http://www.flickr.com/photos/90432686@N06/8212487279/lightbox/

Thanks,
Monsoon84

User currently onlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7238 posts, RR: 32
Reply 8, posted (5 months 3 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 543 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 7):
What do you think about the contrast and sharpness?

They look better, but do you have an angle where the fire extinguisher isn't blocking anything? The red bucket may not have been avoidable, but the extinguisher looks like it was.

User currently offlinemonsoon84 From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (5 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 538 times:

I do not   there were buildings on both sides of me. This was the only spot on the fence where I could see it without one of the building in the way. Do you think I should try uploading it?


Thanks,
Monsoon84

User currently onlinedlowwa From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 7238 posts, RR: 32
Reply 10, posted (5 months 3 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 511 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD SCREENER

Quoting monsoon84 (Reply 9):
Do you think I should try uploading it?

You could, but just be prepared for a motive rejection. How rare is the aircraft? If it's new to the db, there might be a little allowance for the obstruction.

User currently offlinemonsoon84 From United States of America, joined Jul 2011, 53 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (5 months 3 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 498 times:

Ok, I'll try uploading it... There are only 3 photos of this aircraft so I'll try. Thank you for the help.



Monsoon84

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Post Screening Help MD80
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format