These two were rejected for centered with the comments being high in frame. I'm getting a little confused here as I've recently make some comments in the feedback forum about some shots maybe being high of low in frame which seemed to be composed in a similar fashion only to read additional comments from a screener that they looked good in frame. I know there's been much discussion on centering and it can have some variance from person to person. In these instances I've centered the a/c to not just the fuselage but also including the gear. Are they worthy of appeal or just try to re-crop? http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...01777.2019dsc_0540_____95-0095.jpg http://www.airliners.net/addphotos/r...700015.0168dsc_0537_____950093.jpg
Thanks for the help.
Oh, it's a big pretty white plane with red stripes, curtains in the windows and wheels and it looks like a big Tylenol.
NZ107 From New Zealand, joined Jul 2005, 6493 posts, RR: 37
Reply 1, posted (2 years 3 months 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 735 times:
1. The underbelly around the main gear seems a bit grainy - maybe darken that up a little? Also the sky could be marginally grainy too.
2. A bit of red/magenta coming through.
3. Hmm, TN seemed quite a bit more red than this one.. Colour is fairly easy to fix; much easier to fix if you shoot in RAW. Just make sure you don't overtweak it or you'll end up with a green tint. Use the eyedropper to confirm that the whites are showing up with equal levels of R, G and B.
Center - base it on the top point and bottom point of the fuselage, well use that as a starting reference point; rather than your method of adding the wheels into the equation too. The first of those certainly looks too high - look at the image and see how much deadspace there is. I'd also give the last one a bit more sharpening.