Print from Airliners.net discussion forum http://www.airliners.net/aviation-forums/tech_ops/read.main/64247/ |
Topic: What Was This Big Pencil With 777 On It At LBG? Username: UTA_flyinghigh Posted 2003-07-02 16:04:28 and read 2645 times.707cmf uploaded this pic and stated that she was a :"777-328ER" after some fool gave him the info.
View Large View Medium
 Photo © Antoine Ossadzow
It has since been edited to "777-246ER" which to the worst of my knowledge is the code for JAL. Since AF is supposed to be the launch customer for the 777-300ER, what gives ? and if it's the prototype, shouldn't it be a 300-ER anayways ? |
Topic: RE: What Was This Big Pencil With 777 On It At LBG? Username: JBirdAV8r Posted 2003-07-02 18:24:41 and read 2572 times.UTA_Flyinghigh:
Nowadays, prototypes at Boeing don't remain in the company; often in this day and age of precise computer engineering, the first airplane to roll off the assembly line is ultimately destined for the airlines. This 777 is no exception. |
Topic: RE: What Was This Big Pencil With 777 On It At LBG? Username: Aaron atp Posted 2003-07-02 18:46:14 and read 2552 times.me thinks it was edited to "777-346/ER" which is indeed correct because cn 32430 is going to JAL...
I don't know why you throw words like "fool" around so loosely... Apparently you take this stuff way to seriously. It was at the Paris Air show, he made a simple mistake in assuming that it would be going to AF, which has 777-328's on order.
***As Jbird has said, prototypes usually go to the airlines, but after the first regular production line aircraft goes to the launch customer... I would assume this is because the prototypes must return to the factory to be refitted for the customer,
I don't know this stuff for sure, I just looked through some reference materials here to find the specifics.
aaron
|
Topic: RE: What Was This Big Pencil With 777 On It At LBG? Username: 707cmf Posted 2003-07-03 00:14:51 and read 2411 times.he made a simple mistake in assuming that it would be going to AF
Well, the mistake is not on me, as I usually rely on UTAflyinglow to give me technical details ('sooo, what are the engines on this aircraft' - as if I cared) I know he is a walking database on heavy aviation, so instead of looking it up on the web, I ask him. Usually he's accurate, but that time, *he* told me it was a 777-328ER, which I believed and wrote in the ac type field. Apparently, someone else corrected it, but who cares... more than 1000 hits in less than one week on a stupid noseshot, that's already worth it !
Antoine |
Topic: RE: What Was This Big Pencil With 777 On It At LBG? Username: UTA_flyinghigh Posted 2003-07-03 15:41:18 and read 2269 times.hey, since the guy who told 707cmf the badinfo was me, I think that entitles me to use the "F: word 
Anyways, they should paint the msn where it's highly visible to people like me wearing glasses. |
Topic: RE: What Was This Big Pencil With 777 On It At LBG? Username: Shawn Patrick Posted 2003-07-05 06:59:25 and read 2097 times.Anyways, they should paint the msn where it's highly visible to people like me wearing glasses.
Yes, because it's all about you, right?  |
Topic: RE: What Was This Big Pencil With 777 On It At LBG? Username: 707cmf Posted 2003-07-05 09:27:47 and read 2074 times.Yes, because it's all about you, right?
Well, if you knew UTA as much as I (unfortunately) know him, you'd be amazed as how right you are !
Antoine |
The messages in this discussion express the views of the author of the message, not necessarily the views of Airliners.net or any entity associated with Airliners.net.Copyright © Lundgren Aerospace. All rights reserved. http://www.airliners.net/ |