Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Engine Thrust At Altitude?  
User currently offlineArmitageShanks From UK - England, joined Dec 2003, 3638 posts, RR: 15
Posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 12320 times:

How much thrust is lost at cruising altitude compared with sea-level?

For example, say if an engine produced 10k pounds of thrust at sea level, how much thrust would it produce at 10,000 or 35,000 feet?

6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6896 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 12283 times:

Jane's used to give Mach 0.8-at-FL350 thrusts for some engines-- it was usually around a fifth of sea-level static.

User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 2, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 12142 times:

The ratio should be just about exactly the ratio of the local air pressure to standard at sea level.

Standard atmosphere table says where sea level is 1 atmosphere or about 14.7 PSI,
at 10000' it is 0.6877 of sea level
at 20000' it is 0.4595 of sea level
at 30000' it is 0.2970 of sea level
at 36089' it is 0.2234 of sea level ("standard" height of tropopause)
at 40000' it is 0.1851 of sea level

So I would expect a 24K engine to be producing just under 5400 pounds at the tropopause. There might be some other factors but I think these numbers would be pretty close.





Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineBd5jdave From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 5 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 1 month 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 11657 times:

That depends totally on the aircraft the engine is in. It's all a question of drag. If your 10K engine was in a heavy, fat airplane, drag would limit the airplane's speed. Your engine would produce, say, 2K thrust at 35,000 at max speed (Mach .85 for this example). Now, put this same engine a sleek, small fighter, and your aerodynamic top speed is much faster- say Mach 1.5. Now you have more air entering the inlet to combust, producing more thrust. You have more room to work with the inlet and exhaust, so you can cheat more thrust out of it that way as well.

The above is a simplified example, but a sound one.

It's just not cut and dried. That's why Aero Engineering is so tough. It's a game of give and take. Jets are typically designed for a narrow range in its "cruise speed" because an airplane has to be designed for certain operating conditions. This will take in account the total drag coefficient, design operating altitude, and engine performance. You design for one thing, and then have to change something else. It's an excercise in compromise.

And it's frustrating....


User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6518 posts, RR: 54
Reply 4, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 11350 times:

http://www.cfm56.com gives the data for CFM56 engines.

For instance a 22k CFM56-5B5 (very common on A319s) will deliver max 5,020 lbs at FL350.

Other versions, e.g. the -5B4 and -5B6 with 27k and 23.5k TO thrust, have the same max 5,020 lbs at FL350. I would guess that the -5B5 and -5B6 are basically identical to the -5B4, but with derated TO thrust for longer on wing time and reduced maintenance requirements.

So there is not a direct relationship between max thrust and ambient air density. But it is pretty close.

BTW, did you know that the max thrust of a P&W J-75 in a Lockheed U-2R way up in coffin corner is just some 700-800 lbs?

[Edited 2004-10-22 00:29:11]

[Edited 2004-10-22 00:30:11]

[Edited 2004-10-22 00:31:04]


Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineBR715-A1-30 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (10 years 1 month 1 week 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 11273 times:

The BR715 produces about two-to-four thousand pounds of thrust at altitude. Immediately after Takeoff, Thrust is reduced to about 17,000 pounds.

User currently offlineIDAWA From Italy, joined Aug 2004, 303 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 month 3 hours ago) and read 10992 times:

SlamClick is correct, at least as a general theory. My university knowledge doesn't go deeper than SlamClick's post, so I assume that other posts are correct!

I'd like to add something for piston engines: instead of providing thrust, they provide power (thrust*speed), and power is reduced with the same ratio as thrust (current altitude air density vs. sea level air density).
To mitigate this effect, some piston engined are fitted with a compressor, that allows power to be unchanged by altitude from sea level to the so-called "ciritcal altitude". Above such altitude, power decreases as if the engine hadn't been fitted with the compressor.

I-DAWA.



Flown on: 319, 320, 321, 340, 727, 737, 747, 757, 767, 777, DC9, D10, M11, M80, 146, EM2, BEH, CRJ, DH8, L4T.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Engine Thrust At Altitude?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
757 Engine Thrust Comparison. posted Thu Oct 19 2006 05:09:36 by BOE773
Engine Thrust: Rating Vs. Real Differences posted Sun Sep 24 2006 20:49:42 by A342
Change In Engine Sounds At Max Power posted Thu Jan 26 2006 06:35:53 by Dr.DTW
757 Engine Numbers At Idle posted Wed Aug 17 2005 18:01:27 by Taguilo
2nd Engine Failure At CWU In Two Weeks posted Tue Nov 23 2004 04:26:39 by CWUPilot
DC-10/MD-11 Center Engine Thrust posted Thu Nov 4 2004 08:18:55 by BrodieBrazil
Need Serious Clairification Re: Engine Thrust posted Thu Oct 7 2004 23:43:18 by Lehpron
Jet Engine Thrust Percentage posted Mon Aug 9 2004 09:03:03 by Videns
Different Engine Thrust In Cruise? posted Fri Mar 26 2004 13:55:39 by KLM777
Engine Efficency At DEN posted Sun Nov 2 2003 20:06:41 by Futureualpilot
Engine Thrust Specs posted Mon Jun 29 2009 07:34:11 by SpeedBirdA380
Question For 737-200 Pilots - Engine Out At Wheels posted Thu Aug 30 2007 07:18:32 by GreginAlaska
Procedure For Engine Failure At Night posted Mon Jun 25 2007 19:32:19 by GAIsweetGAI
Leaning Mixture At Altitude (PA28) posted Mon Jun 4 2007 21:54:43 by LHR27C
757 Engine Thrust Comparison. posted Thu Oct 19 2006 05:09:36 by BOE773
Engine Thrust: Rating Vs. Real Differences posted Sun Sep 24 2006 20:49:42 by A342
Advancement In Engine Thrust Reverser? posted Tue Sep 7 2010 02:21:22 by celestar
Engine Start At The Gate? posted Tue Feb 16 2010 04:08:40 by bahadir
Engine Thrust Specs posted Mon Jun 29 2009 07:34:11 by SpeedBirdA380
Question For 737-200 Pilots - Engine Out At Wheels posted Thu Aug 30 2007 07:18:32 by GreginAlaska
Procedure For Engine Failure At Night posted Mon Jun 25 2007 19:32:19 by GAIsweetGAI
Leaning Mixture At Altitude (PA28) posted Mon Jun 4 2007 21:54:43 by LHR27C
757 Engine Thrust Comparison. posted Thu Oct 19 2006 05:09:36 by BOE773
Engine Thrust: Rating Vs. Real Differences posted Sun Sep 24 2006 20:49:42 by A342

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format