Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Aircraft Engine Tests - Questions  
User currently offlineStudentFlyer From Australia, joined Sep 2004, 688 posts, RR: 3
Posted (9 years 10 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4717 times:

Hi all, I have recently noticed that new engines being tested for new aircraft uses older test aircrafts, such as the GE90-115B done on a 747-121, and RR Trent 500 & 900 on a 340-311.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Je89 W.



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © French Frogs AirSlides


Now, my question is: Why are these engines placed in engine no. 2 position? I know the wing fairings are stronger near the fuselage, as they are near the centre-wing-box. But, why don't they place it in Engine no. 3 position? Has anyone seen engine tests that are placed in engine no. 3 position?

Also, does anyone know which engine was tested in this similar manner?

Sorry if this topic has been asked before, but I couldn't find it in the search.

Thanks,
AK

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAir2gxs From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 4685 times:

An inboard engine is used in order to minimize the moment-arm of the engine being tested. Imagine a GE90 producing full thrust while installed in an outboard position without the same thrust being produced on the other wing.

Once you modify an aircraft to do this type of task, you'll use the same aircraft. So, the #2 position will be used on that particular test-bed. Why mess witht he other positions?

Why is the #2 position chosen over the #3? Who knows. Tradition, maybe?


User currently offlineSanthosh From India, joined Sep 2001, 545 posts, RR: 1
Reply 2, posted (9 years 10 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 4642 times:

Air2gxs

Sir how is the vibration in N1 and N2 measured? Dose they use accelerometers or other kind of transducers to sense this. Also what units are used to represent the Vibration in engines and what values does it usually reach?

George



Happy Landing
User currently offlineAir2gxs From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 4475 times:

I can only speak for a few engines, but N1 is usually measured with a transducer that either counts fan blades (JT9D) or counts "teeth" on the fan shaft (CF6 & CFM). N2 is usually from a small tach generator mounted to the gearbox.

Vibration is measured using accelerometers. Fromthe B767 AMM:

With engine operating, the engine accelerometers generate signals proportional to engine motion in a radial direction. These signals are received by the AVM signal conditioner, where they are converted to signals suitable for the EICAS computer. Signals are then sent to the display unit from the computer where vibration displacement or velocity is read in units.


User currently offlineSanthosh From India, joined Sep 2001, 545 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4441 times:

Sir thankyou very much for the information regarding vibration and its measurment. Sir could you please tell me what is the difference between the CF6 and CFM engines?


Happy Landing
User currently offlineDl757md From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1562 posts, RR: 16
Reply 5, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 4440 times:

how is the vibration in N1 and N2 measured? Dose they use accelerometers or other kind of transducers to sense this. Also what units are used to represent the Vibration in engines and what values does it usually reach?
The accelerometers are usually a piezoelectric type. Here's a link about how piezoelectric accelerometers work. http://www.sensorsmag.com/articles/0204/27/main.shtml
The accelerometers are mounted either on a bearing housing inside the engine or on the fan case, depending on the engine. The signals are processed in the AVM (rotational speed is factored in) and sent to the EICAS computer which displays them on the EICAS display in the cockpit. Most of the displays I've seen max out at 4. This scale is arbitrary in that is there is no quantifiable unit. It is a reference. The AMM will tell you what readings you have to reach before the vibration has to addressed. Generally anything above a 2 needs to be rectified. There's not much you can do to fix N2 vibes without an overhaul but you can balance the N1 fan on the wing.

Dl757Md



757 Most beautiful airliner in the sky!
User currently offlineAir2gxs From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 4420 times:

Getting into a lot of technical stuff between the CF6 & CFM(56). CF6 is a large, high by-pass fan engine mounted on a variety of aircraft including B767, B747, MD11, etc. The CFM is a smaller high by-pass fan mounted on aircraft such as DC-8-7x and B737-300 & above I believe.

User currently offlineStudentFlyer From Australia, joined Sep 2004, 688 posts, RR: 3
Reply 7, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 6 days 6 hours ago) and read 4398 times:

Also, CF6 is made by General Electric, whereas the CFM is a joint project between General Electric and SNECMA Moteurs. CFM56s are also the only engine used in Airbus A340-200 and 300 if I'm not mistaken.

Anyway guys, thank you so much for the reply to this thread. It has certainly increased my knowledge  Smile. Thanks Air2gxs, and Dl757Md. To Santosh, thank you for asking such a question. It has certainly helped me with a lot more information.

Regards,
AK


User currently offlineKlaus From Germany, joined Jul 2001, 21467 posts, RR: 53
Reply 8, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4304 times:

I guess the reason for the #2 position could due to logistics: Even a flying testbed will have ballast and test equipment to be loaded and unloaded; Obstructing the cargo access doors on the starboard side either by the big engine itself or by the ground support or maintenance infrastructure might be impractical...

User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6737 posts, RR: 11
Reply 9, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 4298 times:

Pratt's B720 (N720PW) has the #3 position



From here
http://www.pw.utc.com/pr_082100.asp



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
User currently offlineStudentFlyer From Australia, joined Sep 2004, 688 posts, RR: 3
Reply 10, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 4243 times:

Oly720man,

Thanks for providing the picture of the B720 with engine tested at #3. Now I know that engine test does not necessarily be at position #2. Thanks for the picture  Smile

Welcome to my RR list  Smile


User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 59
Reply 11, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 4230 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Martin Vézina


Testbed engine at position # 2.5







View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © James Richard Covington, Jr


Testbed engine at position # 2.75


 Smile


2H4



Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineBuzz From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 697 posts, RR: 21
Reply 12, posted (9 years 10 months 3 weeks 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 4211 times:

Hi StudentFlyer, Buzz here. And maybe it's tradition. On the 747's there are hard points to bolt a 5th pod between the #2 engine and fuselage.
Back when the 747's were new, somebody was wondering how to haul an extra engine to a sick airplane. Sure, you could try to find a large cargo plane, or maybe you can bolt one on... So the 5th pod (4th pod on a DC-10, and i don't know L-1011's very well) was developed.
There's a short pylon, and in the kit there's a dome to cover the core of the engine. Fan blades are removed and stowed in a box, carried as freight.
Anyway, i'm thinking it's tradition.
g'day


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Aircraft Engine Tests - Questions
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Aircraft (engine) Maintenance Protocols posted Thu Jun 1 2006 18:13:34 by Goinv
Aircraft Engine Fires - Types posted Mon Nov 28 2005 08:22:04 by HAWK21M
Stages Of Aircraft Engine Development posted Sun Oct 17 2004 23:50:28 by Cancidas
Aircraft Engine Testing - Birds posted Wed Dec 3 2003 18:36:48 by Lindy
Aircraft Engine-out Performance. posted Tue Jul 8 2003 22:48:35 by Gordonsmall
MD80 & 727 Engine Sounds Questions posted Sat Dec 21 2002 22:01:58 by Bruce
V2500 Aircraft-engine posted Thu Nov 29 2001 15:34:35 by Steven
Single Engine Procedures For Commuter Aircraft posted Sun Sep 17 2006 22:05:36 by AdamWright
Aircraft Consulting Questions posted Tue Aug 1 2006 03:36:42 by Dw747400
Flight Tests Confirm Methods To Quieten Aircraft posted Tue Nov 22 2005 17:04:11 by Chksix

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format