Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MD11 Question  
User currently offlineVidens From Argentina, joined Mar 2004, 133 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1810 times:

How is the #2 engine mounted and supported? Is it an "upside down" pylon on the bottom of the engine? How similar (or not) is the pylon compared to the pylons for the #1 and #3 engines? Is it even called a pylon?
Answers appreciated;

videns


Travel? Why would i travel if I can watch it on TV?
5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDl757Md From United States of America, joined May 2004, 1562 posts, RR: 16
Reply 1, posted (9 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 day ago) and read 1745 times:

Videns

Great questions! The pylon (yes it is called a pylon) is above the engine and the engine hangs from it. The pylon mount is identical to 1 and 3 in that the engine attach points are the same. This is so any spare engine can be mounted at any location. I'm not sure but the pylon is probably fitted to the airframe differently.

Dl757Md



757 Most beautiful airliner in the sky!
User currently offlineCX346 From Greenland, joined Apr 2003, 49 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 8 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 1538 times:

what was the rationale for the tail engine in the first place, and why was it abandoned ??

User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 13967 posts, RR: 63
Reply 3, posted (9 years 8 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1471 times:

As DI757MD stated, #2 engine is hanging from a pylon attached to the rear spar of the vertical stabilizer. The whole structure is a bit complicated to explain, but basically you have 4 socalled banjo fittings, huge titanium forgings, looking like a ring with an attachment on top and on the bottom. The bottom attachment is connected to the rear fuselage, while the top attachments connect to the four spars of the vertical stabilizer.
The hole inside the rings is the inlet tunnel of #2 engine.
The fan case of #2 engine is bolted to a unit called a bell mouth, wich has a sliding connection with the inlet tunnel (so that the engine can vibrate and move without disturbing the structure of the inlet).
The engine mounts and accessories of #2 engine are slightly different from the other two engines. Additional to the two mount plates on top, which transmit the engine weight and thrust to the airframe, there is another diagonal brace at the bottom connecting the engine fan case with the lower attachment of the last banjo fitting to carry the torque forces of the engine and to transmit them to the airframe. Also, on the CF-6 engine, the hydraulic pump supply line comes from the bottom instead of from the top.
#2 engine also has a remote manual start valve mechanism with a push pull cable leading to a handle in the tail cone compartment. Additionally, there are remote service lines for both the engine oil tank and the IDG plus a remote IDG filter differential popout indicator, also located in the tail cone. You can´t just install a wing engine in the #2 position, you´ll have to modify it slightly before.

The reason for the DC-10 / MD-11 #2 engine layout was that they wanted to have a straight inlet to give the engine full performance, unlike the 727 or the L1011, where the s-duct restricts the performance of #2 engine.

Jan


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 4, posted (9 years 8 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 1465 times:

what was the rationale for the tail engine in the first place, and why was it abandoned ??

The three major manufacturers took 3 different approaches. Boeing went with two huge engines, McDD went with 3 engines of 744 size, and Airbus went with 4 much smaller and easier to maintain engines.

The structure necessary to support the tail mount is very heavy, and maintaining an engine several stories off the ground is challenging even on good days.

N


User currently offlineNudelhirsch From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 1438 posts, RR: 19
Reply 5, posted (9 years 8 months 4 weeks 1 hour ago) and read 1431 times:

Gigneil, Airbus with 4 engines in the tail?

I only know of the Vickers VC-10 and the Lockheed Jetstar with that layout...

Edit: the IL62 too... Big grin

[Edited 2004-10-31 04:55:46]


Putana da Seatbeltz!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic MD11 Question
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airborne Express 767-200: Loading Question posted Wed Dec 6 2006 16:09:58 by Jonathan-l
An XB-70 AV-2 Question. posted Tue Dec 5 2006 23:59:56 by Starglider
Bombardier Q400 Field Performance: Question posted Sun Dec 3 2006 17:40:48 by A342
Continental 737-300 Cockpit Question posted Fri Nov 24 2006 08:26:31 by Artsyman
MD11-DC10 posted Sun Nov 12 2006 17:11:04 by Kearney
Headwinds Question posted Sun Nov 12 2006 10:36:39 by FCA787
B767-200 Fuel Consumption Question posted Sun Nov 12 2006 07:06:31 by Jetline
Concorde Gear Question posted Tue Nov 7 2006 18:38:10 by EHHO
Lockheed L-2000 Question posted Sat Nov 4 2006 00:06:17 by Blackbird
SXM Runway Length Question... posted Fri Nov 3 2006 19:51:57 by T7ILS13LatJFK

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format