Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
User currently offlineVidens From Argentina, joined Mar 2004, 133 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 7 months 21 hours ago) and read 1454 times:

Horizontal stabilizers are airfoils right?
Are vertical stabilizers airfoils? Their shape seem to indicate they are...

In large transport aircraft, there doesn't seem to be any designs to reduce drag on these airfoils (Like winglets, or wing fences, or whatever)...
Horizontal stabilizers move up or down to trim the aircraft, which makes the design of a drag-reducing device harder, because of the different regimes they have to work under...
What about vertical stabilizers? They do look like an upright wing, which would induce drag, but I haven't seen any drag-reducing measures for that...
Does reducing the drag on these devices have such a negligible effect that they don't use it?
Any thoughts, corrections, or links to look into?
Please don't mention the Beluga or the 747 space shuttle transport, as the added stabilizers were added for stability, not drag reduction....

Travel? Why would i travel if I can watch it on TV?
2 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineQantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 22
Reply 1, posted (11 years 7 months 20 hours ago) and read 1432 times:

Horizontal stabilizers are airfoils right?

Yes, horizontal stabilizers are airfoils. More specifically, they're inverted airfoils (i.e. they produce downward lift - a nose-up moment - which counteracts the nose-down moment produced by most wings).

Are vertical stabilizers airfoils?

Yes, vertical stabilizers are airfoils as well. Unlike horizontal stabilizers, however, they're usually symmetrical.

As for control-surface drag reduction devices, they're basically not worth the added weight, parasite drag, and manufacturing costs. The amount of lift produced by vertical and horizontal stabilizers is relatively small (particularly in the case of vertical stab.'s, as under normal conditions almost no lift is produced at all) and the resulting induced drag is even smaller still, such that any winglet-like device would be more trouble than its worth for the reasons stated above.


User currently offline747NUT From Australia, joined Sep 2004, 78 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (11 years 7 months 18 hours ago) and read 1434 times:

"What about vertical stabilizers? They do look like an upright wing, which would induce drag, but I haven't seen any drag-reducing measures for that..."

A vertical stabilizer is a symmetrical wing as mentioned before.
The purpose of a winglet is to prevent wing tip vortices that are produced by the different air pressures on either side of a wing.
With a vertical stabilizer being symmetrical you do not get the pressure differencial like on a wing, therefore there is no need for winglets.

If it's not broken, don't fix it !
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Stabilizers
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Concorde: Why No Horizontal Stabilizers? posted Wed Jan 5 2005 13:29:06 by Thrust
Stabilizers posted Sun Oct 31 2004 07:00:58 by Videns
Rear Horizontal Stabilizers: I Don't Get It. posted Wed Jul 14 2004 22:06:05 by DIA
Extra Fuel In Horizontal And Vertical Stabilizers posted Sat Sep 28 2002 14:56:00 by Godbless

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format