Bryan Becker From United States of America, joined Mar 2001, 333 posts, RR: 0 Posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 3552 times:
Does enyone know how to convert pounds of thrust to horse power I'd like know how to find out. My friend says that drag racers have more horse power. I'd realy like to find out if it is true Thanks!!!!!
242 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 498 posts, RR: 1 Reply 1, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 3400 times:
Well, I don't have a conversion formula for you, but here's some numbers on a P&W 1800 turbo shaft engine found on the EMB-120, a 33 seat regional aircraft that weighs in at about 25,000 pounds at max takeoff weight.
Spinning at 30,000 rpm, this little engine produces 1800 horsepower and a whopping 77,000 foot pounds of torque. These figures are for EACH engine.
After working on these engines for a few years, I just can't look at a "high performance" reciprocating automotive engine without laughing.
Aerotech From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 259 posts, RR: 2 Reply 2, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3395 times:
Oh, let me talk to your friend. Hes takling about tourque, not horsepower. The equation is simple. IT's 2 horsepower to one pound of thrust. So, for example, a dragster has 5,000 H.P., while a 747 (with 250,000 lbs. of thrust) has 500,000 H.P. So he can stick that in his pipe and smoke it. MY dad is the same way. And, just for reference, the Space Shuttle (or at least, the two booster rockets at launch) produces 7 million pounds of thrust, which is 14 million horespower.
Dynkrisolo From United States of America, joined Feb 2001, 1845 posts, RR: 8 Reply 3, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3385 times:
Thrust is a measure of force. Horsepower is a measure of power or rate of work which is the product of force and velocity. Without knowing the velocity, comparing thrust and horsepower is totally meaningless.
Timz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6646 posts, RR: 7 Reply 4, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 3383 times:
Power is force (or thrust, let's say) times speed. It so happens that at a speed of 375 statute miles per hour, the horsepower equals the force-- if force is measured in pounds. At 750 miles per hour the horsepower would be twice the force in pounds, and so on.
So if a 747 flew at 750 mph, and if it had a thrust of 250,000 lb at that speed, then it would be generating 500,000 hp. But 747 cruise thrust (at 35,000 ft altitude) is maybe 50,000 lb at maybe 550 mph, so cruise horsepower is something like 75,000.
242, dunno which decimal point you misplaced-- is it really 70,000 lb-ft of torque? If so, it couldn't be at 30,000 rpm, since that combination adds up to 400,000 hp.
Avt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5 Reply 11, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 3331 times:
Back when I worked on CV580s, my favourite instrument was the horsepower indicators(not torque!). The index was 0-4, and it was labelled "HPx 1,000"!
More numbers; the PW123 (Dash 8) is rated at 2380 hp.
Timz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6646 posts, RR: 7 Reply 14, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 3318 times:
Aerotech says 4700 shp, 22000 lb-ft, which implies 1100 rpm; 777_sandbag says 4910 eshp (maybe 4500 shp?), 19600 lb-inches, which implies something like 15,000 rpm. So one is gearbox output and one is input?
242 From United States of America, joined Oct 2000, 498 posts, RR: 1 Reply 15, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 3310 times:
One of the reasons I retained this little tidbit of information onr the P&W 1800 is that it seemed abnormally high. I'm assuming that this value is at the prop flange, however, the torque probes are at the rear of the engine. The wording in the manual states that when the torque gauges in the cockpit read 100%, this equals 77,000 ft/lb of torque. I no longer work on this aircraft, otherwise I'd scan the page to show you all.
Aerotech From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 259 posts, RR: 2 Reply 17, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 3295 times:
As you may know, many limits (not just power) imposed by the maufacturer are there for longevity, and safety reasons. However, I have talked to a C-130 (H2) pilot here at Elmendorf A.F.B. who has personally had them up to 22,500. The maintenance crews actually painted a red line on the torque guage on the line between 22 and 23.
777_sandbag From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 18, posted (12 years 9 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 3288 times:
I would love to know what TIT was reached to achieve 22,500 in-lb. At 1077 deg c we normally have trouble reaching 19,600. It would have been interesting to do a borescope on the turbine and have a look at the mag plugs.