Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Turbofans Vs Turbojets  
User currently offlineLuisde8cd From Pitcairn Islands, joined Aug 2004, 2537 posts, RR: 31
Posted (9 years 4 months 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 25300 times:

Can anyone explain the difference between these two kind of engines? are current engines either a turbofan/turbojet or those types were only used to designate 1st generation jets?

Thanks for the input!

15 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineTWAMD-80 From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 1006 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 25258 times:

I'll give this a shot. A pure turbojet engine is one that doesn't have any bypass air. An example would be the engines on an old DC-9. A Turbofan is a turbojet engine that has a fan strapped to the front of it. Some of the air from the fan is ducted around the center turbojet section.

In addition to that you have low-bypass turbofan engines and high-bypass turbofan engines. An example of a low-bypass fan engine is an MD-80's JT8D. There is not a lot of air that bypasses the actual turbojet section. A good visible example of a high-bypass fan engine is the GE fan on the 747-400. If you look in pictures you can see a gap between the jet section and the engine cowling - this is where the bypass air flows through. Hope this helps.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Jonathan Simmons
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Craig Boyes



TW



Two A-4's, left ten o'clock level continue left turn!
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 25253 times:

I guess the short answer would be with a Turbojet..100% of the air passes through the engine giving you the thrust. With a Turbofan only 20% of the air actually passes through the core engine. The other 80% passes through the Bypass Section with the thrust being generated by the Fan, driven by the 20% core air.


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineLuisde8cd From Pitcairn Islands, joined Aug 2004, 2537 posts, RR: 31
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 25228 times:

Now I get it. Thanks for the quick replies!

User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 4, posted (9 years 4 months 6 days 17 hours ago) and read 25220 times:

A pure turbojet engine is one that doesn't have any bypass air. An example would be the engines on an old DC-9.

All DC-9s have had Turbofans. For pure turbojets, early marks of the 707 and DC-8 are an example.



I guess the short answer would be with a Turbojet..100% of the air passes through the engine giving you the thrust. With a Turbofan only 20% of the air actually passes through the core engine. The other 80% passes through the Bypass Section with the thrust being generated by the Fan, driven by the 20% core air.

The proportions don't have to be 80/20. Many early turbofans had less than half of the air as bypass air. Only later models have had proportions of 80/20 or so. The important thing, as you say, is that in turbofans there is a bypass air component.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineNewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 30
Reply 5, posted (9 years 4 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 25113 times:

On the FAA's N-code look-up site (http://162.58.35.241/acdatabase/nnum_inquiry.asp), they list airliners' engine type as turbo-jet, even though the planes are obviously turbo-fan. Do they simply say all jet aircraft are equipped with turbo-jet as a means of saying it is a jet powered aircraft, or is this a mistake by the site?


Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineQantasA332 From Australia, joined Dec 2003, 1500 posts, RR: 26
Reply 6, posted (9 years 4 months 5 days 20 hours ago) and read 25106 times:

Good catch, Newark777. Turbojets and turbofans should indeed be differentiated on there, though I guess it's not of that much importance for a rego database...

Cheers,
QantasA332


User currently offline411A From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1826 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (9 years 4 months 5 days 19 hours ago) and read 25088 times:

Early turboJET engines such as the Pratt & Whitney JT4A-17 used on the B707-320 had lots of thrust, with very good high altitude performance, but suffered from poor runway performance, as all the air went thru the core.
Early turboFAN engines (JT3D-3B for example) used on the 707-320B had much better runway performance, but above FL370, suffered from rather large altitude thrust loss, as the fan was optimused for lower altitude performance.

Later designs of course improved on this and in addition, turboFAN engines have better specific fuel economy.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31568 posts, RR: 57
Reply 8, posted (9 years 4 months 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 25035 times:

Examples would be:-
JT3Ds of the B707s were Turbojets.
JT8Ds of the B732s were Low Bypass Turbofans
CFM56s of the B737NG were High Bypass Turbofans

Turbjets:- 100% of the Air sucked in thru the inlet is used for combustion
Turbofans:- Part of the Air sucked in thru the inlet is used for combustion the rest is used as bypass air,mainly generates the thrust.
In Low Bypass the ratio of core Air to Bypass air would be 1:1,in High bypass it can be 5:1.Speaking of the Examples above.

What is the Bypass ratio for the GE90s.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineAloges From Germany, joined Jan 2006, 8616 posts, RR: 43
Reply 9, posted (9 years 4 months 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 25001 times:

"What is the Bypass ratio for the GE90s."

According to a not-so-convincing source, a GE90-115B has a bypass ratio of an impressing 9:1. Still very much possible, but the site didn't look that professional.



Walk together, talk together all ye peoples of the earth. Then, and only then, shall ye have peace.
User currently offlineAir2gxs From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 4 months 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 24992 times:

Hawk,

One correction: on a pure turbojet (JT3) 100% of the air is not used for combustion. 100% goes down the core. I'm not sure of the ratio, but a substantial component of core air is called secondary air. This is the air that is used to cool the liner and act as a buffer between the flame front and the liner. And let's not forget bleed demands from the aircraft and the internal cooling needs of the engine.

As an instructor of mine once said: (to paraphrase), you can't breathe the exhaust from a 4 cycle engine, but if you can stand the heat and taste, you can breathe the exhaust of a pure jet.


User currently offlineTarantine From United States of America, joined Sep 2000, 210 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (9 years 4 months 5 days 5 hours ago) and read 24963 times:

Also, a fanjet makes much less noise than a turbojet; this was a BIG deal in the early 1960s, probably more so than fuel efficiency.

User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6707 posts, RR: 7
Reply 12, posted (9 years 4 months 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 24948 times:

"JT3Ds of the B707s were Turbojets."

JT3Cs, you mean. And JT4As. JT3Ds and JT8Ds (pre -200 series JT8Ds that is) had bypass ratios around 1:1.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31568 posts, RR: 57
Reply 13, posted (9 years 4 months 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 24832 times:

Air2gxs....You are correct.It would be less than 100%.
Timz....What was the Differences between the JT3C & 3D.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6707 posts, RR: 7
Reply 14, posted (9 years 4 months 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 24807 times:

The original 707-121, -123, -124, -131, -138 and -139 had JT3C turbojets, rated 13000 to 13500 lb thrust with water injection. Pan Am's -121s and AA's -123s were all converted to JT3D turbofans, rated 17000 (?) lb with no need for water injection. All 707s built after... 1962? had turbofans.

User currently offlinePhilhyde From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 676 posts, RR: 1
Reply 15, posted (9 years 4 months 3 days 2 hours ago) and read 24808 times:

I stumbled across this site a while back. It's a little funky, but the information is good.

http://www.thaitechnics.com/engine/engine_intro.html



HoustonSpotters Admin - Canon junkie - Aviation Nut
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Turbofans Vs Turbojets
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Jet Engines Vs. Turbofans posted Wed Feb 18 2004 21:37:01 by Iluv727s
Aircraft Vs Race Cars: Temps, Wear And Tear, Etc posted Thu Nov 2 2006 07:34:20 by TimePilot
DC-8 Vs 707 Today posted Tue Oct 31 2006 05:49:17 by DLKAPA
Airport Design - Arrival Vs. Departure Floor posted Wed Oct 25 2006 05:08:15 by Abrelosojos
BMW And Turbofans posted Sat Oct 21 2006 00:03:15 by Socal
HF Vs VHF Vs UHF R/T Frequencies Useage posted Fri Oct 20 2006 08:28:34 by BOACVC10
757 Vs 767 posted Tue Oct 17 2006 23:57:59 by Freight400
Rwy Capacity: Mixed Use Vs. Non-mixed posted Wed Sep 27 2006 02:27:28 by BuyantUkhaa
Engine Thrust: Rating Vs. Real Differences posted Sun Sep 24 2006 20:49:42 by A342
747 Vs A380-School Project; Need Help posted Tue Sep 19 2006 03:07:29 by Speedbird747BA

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format