Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Cabin Air Refresh Rates  
User currently offlinePlaneSmart From New Zealand, joined Dec 2004, 1080 posts, RR: 0
Posted (10 years 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 3919 times:

If cabin air was replaced as frequently as in the 70's to mid 80's, (partly because smoking was permitted back then), bleedless engines wouldn't be viable, as the power req'd to heat incoming air for cabin use would be too great. As cabin air standards are currently set so low, bleedless is possible.

What is the maximum cabin refresh rate the 7e7 is going to be capable of at 30,000 feet versus 777, 767, 757, 747, A32, A33, A38, MD11?

How will 7e7 operators raise the refresh rate if a higher standard is demanded / req'd by customers and/or the World Health Organisation?

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJetMechMD80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 380 posts, RR: 7
Reply 1, posted (10 years 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3858 times:

There is no difference between the rate the cabin air was "replaced" in the 70s. and 80s. The same aircraft are in service, with the same packs, recirculation fans, and out-flow valves. They are operated the same way they always have been. The goal is to pressurize the cabin, and heat it to a comfortable level. That's it. Nothing has changed. I can not answer your other questions about the 7E7's rate, or WHO standards. Sorry.


"I get along great with nobody"~ Billy Idol
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3853 times:

Great! Disease runs rampant all over the globe. In parts of Africa, AIDS is more common than electricity and WHO decides to set standards for airliner cabin air.

What a useless bunch of fops!



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineJetMechMD80 From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 380 posts, RR: 7
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3839 times:

SlamClick,

If you were not already on my rec list, after that comment I would be adding you. Thanks for the laugh. Big grin



"I get along great with nobody"~ Billy Idol
User currently offlineDalmd88 From United States of America, joined Jul 2000, 2614 posts, RR: 14
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3812 times:

The current rate of air refresh is actually very high. Somewhere I read a report from Boeing detailing the 767 system. The air exchange rate actually exceeds the rate for an infectious desease area of a hospital. I'll bet the 7e7 will still have a similar rate.

User currently offlineSchooner From United Kingdom, joined Oct 2001, 139 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 days 11 hours ago) and read 3809 times:

The refresh rate is much better than that which you would get in an office.

Cheers.



Untouched and Alive
User currently offlineHa763 From United States of America, joined Jan 2003, 3671 posts, RR: 5
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3768 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

According to Boeing, the norm on most Boeing aircraft is 50% recirculated and 50% fresh air. I say, "most Boeing aircraft," because the 717 is 100% fresh air. Also current cabin air systems circulate enough air to replenish the whole cabin every 2-3 minutes. This is way better than the air exchange rate in an air-conditioned building. More info can be found here:

http://www.boeing.com/commercial/cabinair/


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 3778 times:

The B732 I remember correctly did not have Recirculating Fans,so the Air was 100% Fresh bleed extracted Air.Later versions did come up with One or Two Recirculating fans & so the percentage of Recirculated Air Increased.
However Present Day Aircraft have a refresh rate thats adequate,With no Smoking on board,things are more better.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Cabin Air Refresh Rates
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Recycling Cabin Air posted Tue Mar 22 2005 15:55:48 by Braybuddy
Where Does Fresh Cabin Air Comes From? posted Fri Nov 3 2000 13:48:25 by Nomad_
Cabin Air posted Thu May 11 2000 18:43:38 by Md11dc10
Air Pressure In Cabin posted Sat Apr 2 2005 15:39:38 by SK A340
Cabin Smoke = Ram Air "On" - A Question? posted Wed May 14 2003 22:42:10 by Mr Spaceman
757 Cabin Pressure "Air Vents"? posted Sat Jul 21 2001 19:39:04 by Mr Spaceman
Perfect Cabin... posted Tue Nov 28 2006 20:48:54 by WexCan
Air Crashes Due To Hazardous Crew Attitudes (HELP) posted Mon Nov 27 2006 01:22:58 by NZ747
Air Driven Generator posted Mon Nov 13 2006 16:45:36 by FutureUApilot
Korean Air @ Tripoli, Libya posted Tue Oct 31 2006 09:27:50 by Rufruf

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format