Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Drvsm North America  
User currently offlineNonrvsmdmf From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 186 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2284 times:

I am just curious how many of the majors are actually going to
make the deadline for DRVSM. It goes into effect on Jan 20
and the last flights I took, the pilots said they were not ready.

Does anyone know?


I did not forget...I just misplaced the thought...
22 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2266 times:

SWA is ready...

We've been filing "/Q" on our ATC equipment suffix (i.e. "T/B737/Q" ) since January 5th, although actual operations at the revised altitudes won't start until the 20th.


User currently offlineNonrvsmdmf From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2214 times:

Thanks OPNL guy. We have been using /Q and /W since about
05Jan also.



I did not forget...I just misplaced the thought...
User currently offlineAAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3498 posts, RR: 46
Reply 3, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 2198 times:

The company email I saw this past week said AA & AE planes are ready, but the software programming (SABRE database info) hasn't been completed for all the planes (more than 1,000 individual entries). This was expected to be completed next week (15th).


*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
User currently offlineNonrvsmdmf From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 2162 times:

Hopefully the transition will go better than when RVSM started in
Europe. The middle east transition went fine with the exception
of Pakistan that decided to cap their airspace at FL390 and did
not tell anyone.



I did not forget...I just misplaced the thought...
User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2148 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2112 times:

Most of our CRJs have the critical area placards installed, but they have been coming off after a few flights. I think we are going to switch from decals to paint. That being said, I am going to RVSM class tonight. Big grin

User currently offlineNonrvsmdmf From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2088 times:

UAL, you lost me.

I have no idea what you are talking about.



I did not forget...I just misplaced the thought...
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 2075 times:

>>>Most of our CRJs have the critical area placards installed, but they have been coming off after a few flights. I think we are going to switch from decals to paint.

From the article below:

Moreover, calibration of the static system becomes more critical at higher altitude. A large jet can have a 500-1,000-ft. error at cruising altitudes owing to pressure changes at the static ports resulting from the airflow around the aircraft. These errors can be calibrated out by modern air data systems, Hansman says.

I presume he's referring to info to be affixed near the static ports, to increase awareness of ground/MX folks to treat these things with proper "respect."

http://www.aviationnow.com/avnow/news/channel_awst_story.jsp?id=news/01105air.xml


User currently offlineCFIcraigAPA From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 223 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 9 hours ago) and read 2068 times:

What is the "D" for in DRVSM?
Never heard that before.
CM



Prior Proper Preparation Prevents Piss-Poor Performance
User currently offlineContact_tower From Norway, joined Sep 2001, 536 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2063 times:

"Domestic RVSM" I belive!  Big thumbs up

User currently offlineNonrvsmdmf From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2060 times:

Contact_tower is correct, D stands for Domestic RVSM..leave it
to the FAA need a different name....

Thanks OPNL again, that would make sense.



I did not forget...I just misplaced the thought...
User currently offlineSPREE34 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 2266 posts, RR: 9
Reply 11, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2050 times:

"What is the "D" for in DRVSM?
Never heard that before.
CM"

DRVSM is the name of the FAA program. RVSM is what will happen.




I don't understand everything I don't know about this.
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 12, posted (9 years 11 months 3 weeks ago) and read 2028 times:

All Part 121 aircarft are done and the only a/c that might have issues would be some of the Bizjets... but even then there not grounded..... they just can't go high.


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1982 times:

The weirdest thing is going to be now thinking of FL310, FL350, and FL390 as -eastbound- altitudes.

The former FL310, FL350, and FL390 were westbound altitudes for eons, I'm going to have to re-train my brain to not to see them as "errors" now on eastbound flights.


User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4229 posts, RR: 37
Reply 14, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 1970 times:

9E is...we got all our packets and stuff and the placards are in the airplanes.


Trained by handout packets....



Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2148 posts, RR: 10
Reply 15, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1932 times:

Well, went to RVSM class the other night. Basically what I got out of it is how expensive it is going to be and how many things will cause an aircraft to lose its RVSM qualification. All aircraft have to be "contour mapped" before getting RVSM certified. Autopilot must be working, with altitude hold to within +-65 feet. Any chipped paint over rivet heads in the critical area must be sanded down to make them smooth. We are only allowed 0.007" of imperfection in the critical area. How one can measure 0.007" of imperfection is going to be interesting. Our service checks will now have the added item of RVSM critical area inspection to recertify it. There are a great number of MEL items which will remove the RVSM qualification from the aircraft. It's going to be a real learning experience, that's for sure.

Several types of damage repair in the RVSM critical area will require a "remapping" of the contour of the RVSM area, which can only be done by a 3rd party contractor. Results of the remapping have to be interpreted by Bombardier. All said and done, the airplane will be grounded for several days. It sounds like DRVSM is going to further strain financially strapped airlines.


User currently offlineUSAFHummer From United States of America, joined May 2000, 10685 posts, RR: 52
Reply 16, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 1925 times:

I read in B/CA a few months ago that there is a huge backlog to get much of the US registered bizjet fleet to RVSM standards...is there any updates on this??

Greg



Chief A.net college football stadium self-pic guru
User currently offlineNonrvsmdmf From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 17, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 1903 times:

Greg,

The majority of our clients are certified already. Can't help
you with the ones that are not our clients.



I did not forget...I just misplaced the thought...
User currently offlineUAL Bagsmasher From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 2148 posts, RR: 10
Reply 18, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 1836 times:

From what we were told, bizjets are allowed to be exempt from DRVSM as long as they cruise above FL 410. They will be allowed to climb through the RVSM altitudes so long as they don't cruise there.

User currently offlineNonrvsmdmf From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 1819 times:

UAL what you have been told about bizjet exemtion is incorrect.

There is no guarantee that a non-rvsm aircraft will be allowed to
climb/descend through RVSM airspace. In order for this to
happen, the aircraft must be able to climb direct to FL430 with
no step climbs. This is all subject to the amount of traffic in
the area. If allowed ATC must apply the non-rvsm seperation
standards.

What we have been told is there will only be 4 non-RVSM climbling
slots an hour per sector. The exception is CLE center who has
already said if you are non-RVSM plan on staying at FL280 or
below no exceptions. The problem is one center may allow the
climb above but the destination center will reject it so you will
be stuck at FL280 or below.

Right now if an aircraft is non-RVSM I will treat the flight like
in Eurocontrol airspace and will file them at FL280 or below.
If the capt can negotiate a climb through that would be great.
I never want to "assume" that the capt can get something better.
That way if it is a fuel critical flight and I plan it conservative
there will not be a safety of flight issue.



I did not forget...I just misplaced the thought...
User currently offlineSaab2000 From Switzerland, joined Jun 2001, 1619 posts, RR: 11
Reply 20, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 1738 times:

RVSM was introduced to Europe when I was flying there. It was my experience that RVSM, in addition to other improvements with Euro Control, improved punctuality immensely.

It might do the same thing in the US, but I doubt it. I fly a lot now on the east coast and most of our flying is done below the RVSM altitudes, yet we are significantly delayed anyway.

In Europe many delays were airway related. In the US many delays are related to congestion in terminal areas and RVSM will not help.

Having said that, I hope it helps a bit. Surely it cannot hurt.



smrtrthnu
User currently offlineTimz From United States of America, joined Sep 1999, 6903 posts, RR: 7
Reply 21, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 1722 times:

I see they've been using RVSM over the Pacific already-- that doesn't include the US-Hawaii tracks?

User currently offlineNonrvsmdmf From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 186 posts, RR: 0
Reply 22, posted (9 years 11 months 2 weeks 3 days 19 hours ago) and read 1735 times:

Timz,

The Pacific has been RVSM for quite sometime. The tracks
US-Hawaii are not exempted, they are RVSM also.

I also received conformation yesterday that Mexico, Central
America and South America will also be going RVSM on 20Jan.
That would leave Russia, the majority of the African continent
and China as the largest remaining non-RVSM areas.



I did not forget...I just misplaced the thought...
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Drvsm North America
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Drvsm North America posted Sun Jan 9 2005 13:42:14 by Nonrvsmdmf
No More NOTAMs In North America posted Thu Apr 1 2004 08:38:11 by 707cmf
Question About The A320/A319 In North America posted Wed Aug 27 2003 15:35:22 by Lf278
Start Low, Climb During Cruise, North Atlantic? posted Sun Jul 2 2006 16:36:55 by Julianuk
America West Airbus Always Have Hydraulic Issues posted Fri Feb 10 2006 20:57:27 by MDW22L31C
North: Zero Or Three Sixty Degrees? posted Tue Feb 7 2006 22:15:43 by Bobster2
Crossing Nats Tracks North-south posted Sun May 22 2005 12:13:52 by Geoffm
Eicas North Star posted Sat Jan 15 2005 02:00:07 by Goboeing
Drvsm Questions posted Wed Jan 12 2005 20:11:42 by Modesto2
North Atlantic Etops Question posted Tue May 11 2004 08:08:51 by Hardkor

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format