Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A380 Engines Vs B777 Engines  
User currently offlineEGHHWizard From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 87 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6796 times:

I was just wondering if the engines powering the A380 will be more powerful than the engines on the B777. Also will the A380 take the medal away from the tripple seven for having the largest engines. I was told once that you could quite easily put the fuselage of a B737 into the engine nacelle of the B777. Surely you cannot get bigger than that?


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Philippe Noret - AirTeamImages
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © French Frogs AirSlides




NO URLS in signature
12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineDarkblue From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 233 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 5 days 4 hours ago) and read 6725 times:

Depends on what you mean by the "largest engines".

Will the A380 engines be more powerful that the 777 engines? No, the 777 engine thrust range is 75k to 115k depending on the engine and rating. The A380 engines will have takeoff thrusts in the range of 70k to 80k depending on the engine and rating.

Now, fan size is a different question. Both RR and the GE/PW alliance are using bypass ratios that are higher than that used previously. The fans on these new engines will be just as big as those on the 777 (with the exception of the GE90). Here's a comparison of fan diameter.

On the 777:
GE90: 123"
PW4082: 112"
Trent800: 110"

On the A380:
Trent900: 116"
GP7000: 116"

DB


User currently offlineEGHHWizard From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 87 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 6465 times:

Hey, cheers for the info Darkblue!

Regards,

Richard  Smile



NO URLS in signature
User currently offlineVikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 10331 posts, RR: 26
Reply 3, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 22 hours ago) and read 6355 times:

Also, just to clear this up, you could not fit a 737 fuselage into a 777 engine (even a GE90). The diameter of a GE90 is 134 or 135 inches, depending on which variant. The 737's fuselage diameter is 148 inches. Such a shame... Smile

~Vik



How can I be an admiral without my cap??!
User currently offlineBOEING747400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 6335 times:

A380 engines are slightly less than 70K lbs. thrust per engine which is a correction to the first reply. Weaker than the B777 engines although they look almost as big diameter-wise by comparison.

User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 5, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 7 hours ago) and read 6197 times:

I don't want to be rude, but this topic comes up at least once a week.

The search function is very handy for this sort of thing.

N


User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6536 posts, RR: 54
Reply 6, posted (9 years 11 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 6148 times:

BOEING747400: A380 engines are slightly less than 70K lbs.

Both the GP7000 and the Trent 900 will be rated at exactly 70K lbs. on the A380.

On the A380F they will both be rated at 76.5K.

The difference is hardly more than a number coded in the FADEC software.

The pax plane needs that less power because certified MTOW will be 65K lbs lower, 1.235 million instead of 1.3 million lbs.



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineBOEING747400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (9 years 11 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 5489 times:

Is it hard to believe that the power of the A380 engine is only 70K lbs. thrust when its' fan diameter is 116 inches (by contrast, the 744ER's engine is rated at 62K lbs. thrust with a fan diameter of 93 inches). You would easily expect a much higher level of power when the engine looks huge? Maybe there's an explanation for the lack of positive correlation between fan diameter and total power??

User currently offlineDfwRevolution From United States of America, joined Jan 2010, 1001 posts, RR: 51
Reply 8, posted (9 years 11 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 5481 times:

. I was told once that you could quite easily put the fuselage of a B737 into the engine nacelle of the B777. Surely you cannot get bigger than that?

Not at all. The GE90 core is a baby compared to the massive turbines GE builds for naval application and electrical generation. We know turbine cores can be built much larger... adapt a high-bypass fan, ect and in theory a 150k powerplant could be built!

Granted there is no application for such an engine, and such a large fan would require a high-wing aircraft for ground clearance...

Maybe there's an explanation for the lack of positive correlation between fan diameter and total power??

The larger bypass ratio is more fuel efficent and much quieter on take-off/landing


User currently offlineBOEING747400 From United States of America, joined Sep 2001, 319 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (9 years 11 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 5444 times:

An engine having a diameter of 116 inches with a higher bypass ratio would easily be expected to top 80-90K lbs. thrust? 70K lbs. thrust seems kind of low for such a huge machine on A380??

User currently offlineConcordeBoy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (9 years 11 months 2 days 15 hours ago) and read 5430 times:

PW4082


....does PW know about this?  Big grin


User currently offlineGigneil From United States of America, joined Nov 2002, 16347 posts, RR: 85
Reply 11, posted (9 years 11 months 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 5341 times:

An engine having a diameter of 116 inches with a higher bypass ratio would easily be expected to top 80-90K lbs. thrust? 70K lbs. thrust seems kind of low for such a huge machine on A380??

As DFW already told you, larger fan size = larger bypass ratio as well as increased cold air volume with less work expended.

This means signficant enhancements in fuel efficiency and noise, which was the goal on the A380.

Sure, bigger fan output could be translated into more thrust, but it isn't necessary for this application, nor is the core designed for it. I think both engine's cores are designed to top out around 84,000 pounds with zero modification.

The GENX and Trent 1000 are expected to have 112-116 inch fans, too, to only generate a max of 72,000 pounds of thrust.

N


User currently offlineSpencer From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2004, 1635 posts, RR: 17
Reply 12, posted (9 years 11 months 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 5295 times:

GE90-115B has a fan diameter of 128 inches.
Spencer.



EOS1D4, 7D, 30D, 100-400/4.5-5.6 L IS USM, 70-200/2.8 L IS2 USM, 17-40 f4 L USM, 24-105 f4 L IS USM, 85 f1.8 USM
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic A380 Engines Vs B777 Engines
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why New Engines For A380? posted Mon Apr 24 2006 12:14:41 by Pavlin
135 Vs 136 Engines For JSF posted Wed Apr 5 2006 01:09:18 by DEVILFISH
B 777 Engines Vs. A 380 Engines posted Fri Jun 17 2005 00:04:05 by Bongo
A380 Engines posted Sat Apr 9 2005 06:55:06 by B-787
Twin Engined Turboprops Vs Piston Engines posted Wed Oct 6 2004 12:17:52 by Arniepie
Jet Engines Vs. Turbofans posted Wed Feb 18 2004 21:37:01 by Iluv727s
3 Spool Vs. 2 Spool Engines posted Sun Feb 1 2004 02:51:11 by Baw2198
Width Of Gear, Engines, Wingtips, A380, 777,744 posted Mon Jan 5 2004 21:22:10 by Seagull
A380 Engines posted Tue Jul 30 2002 13:07:44 by DC10Tony
American's 757's Vs TWA's 757's Engines posted Wed Oct 17 2001 17:43:58 by Zebfly2

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format