Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Electrical Loads - Fuel Burn  
User currently offlineA/c train From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2001, 501 posts, RR: 3
Posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 19 hours ago) and read 2138 times:

Ive quite recently done some engine courses and during morning Q +A session we got on to the subject of fuel burn influenced by taking air off the engines etc etc, this is easily understandable.
Then our instructor said that that if you use a bigger electrical load, say when you get icing conditions and your particular aircraft is fitted with leading edge electrical anti-icing blankets, the aircrafts fuel burn with no change in TLA, WILL increase.
So an extra load i.e anti-ice, nose cowl L/E being used will cause higher fuel burn, this surely cant be a significant amount ?
My question is, if so, why ?

I was under the impression, each IDG supplied 90 kva, and the galley will take 20 kva etc etc, but is it a problem with higher torque transmitted back through the engine from the IDG ? ive never been that bothered about this, im just interested. I can notice in cars sometimes, the RPM drops with higher electrical load used.

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineFredT From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 2185 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 months 3 weeks 6 days 18 hours ago) and read 2076 times:

It will take more torque to turn a generator when you are extracting watts from it than when you are not. That's what you see in your car and that's what happens in aircraft.

RPM and shaft torque decides the power which goes through a driveshaft. The RPM doesn't change, but more power is extracted from the generator. As the sum of the energy is constant, the energy going out as electrical power must be matched by mechanical power going in through the driveshaft. This means more torque on the shaft which means you will have to pour more fuel into the engine to keep the RPM the same.


I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Electrical Loads - Fuel Burn
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
B773ER Fuel Burn Rates posted Fri Oct 13 2006 03:35:39 by AF022
DHC-8 Fuel Burn Question posted Tue Sep 26 2006 23:21:12 by Cruisertk421
Improving Fuel Burn With Spray Nozzle Direction? posted Sun Aug 27 2006 00:14:19 by Lehpron
B707 Fuel Burn Comparism posted Sun Aug 6 2006 23:25:27 by Sevenheavy
New Engines For Concorde - Fuel Burn / Range? posted Fri Jul 7 2006 23:36:55 by A342
767 Fuel Burn Rates posted Tue May 30 2006 17:18:59 by DAYflyer
Fuel Burn Question posted Tue Apr 4 2006 03:58:32 by Sleekjet
Idle Fuel Burn Rates posted Wed Mar 22 2006 04:55:20 by AA 737-800
MD-11 Fuel Burn posted Wed Mar 15 2006 19:20:54 by Cruisertk421
Boeing 747-400 Initial Fuel Burn? posted Sun Feb 26 2006 22:34:26 by Qantas744ER

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format