Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Engine Power Setting At Cruise  
User currently offlineGulfstream From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 65 posts, RR: 0
Posted (11 years 3 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 11977 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I an aware that there are different ways of calculating engine power that go beyond my capabilities but I have often wondered what percentage of available power is used at cruise assuming takeoff is 100%.
I frequently fly Aer Lingus between Boston and Shannon and can't help but wonder how much is being asked of those two GE engines all night.
Thanks for any feedback.

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineNewark777 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 9348 posts, RR: 27
Reply 1, posted (11 years 3 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 11927 times:

You can't always compare the cruise power to takeoff power, since takeoffs are commonly performed with reduced power. To answer your question, I have no idea, I'm not a pilot.  Big grin


Why grab a Heine when you can grab a Busch?
User currently offlineKAUSpilot From United States of America, joined Jan 2002, 1976 posts, RR: 30
Reply 2, posted (11 years 3 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 11934 times:

Takeoff is usually not done at 100% power, closer to 95% in the ERJ. Max Speed Cruise usually requires something in the neighborhood of 86-88% N1.

User currently offlineYikes! From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (11 years 3 months 4 days ago) and read 11897 times:

You can't compare the two. Unless you cruise at field elevation.

Turbine engines burn less fuel at higher altitudes and produce higher true airpseeds.

In cruise, approximately 60% of the thrust comes from the fan in a high-bypass (>4:1) engine. At takeoff, the fan is closer to 75% of the total thrust.

Lots of apples and oranges!

User currently offlineFredT From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 2185 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (11 years 3 months 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 11795 times:

In cruise, you are ideally using 100% power - if you use RPM as your power indication.

This does not mean that you are using 100% of the power available at sea level though. You simply climb until 100% RPM will just maintain the ideal cruising speed for your aircraft.

A jet engine is happiest when run like this. Up until you reach the tropopause you gain even more by the reducing temperature.

Of course, the 100% RPM at the top levels will not have nearly the same fuel flows, pressures or temperatures as the lower RPMs down low...

If you want the actual thrust at altitude, the ratio between sea level thrust and cruise level thrust will be largely proportional to the ratio between the air density in cruise and the sea level air density. The power is the thrust times the true air speed... which will be higher at altitude due to the lower air density.

Nothing is so simple it can't get complex when you start looking at it, right?  Big grin


I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
User currently offlineFlyer737sw From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 141 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (11 years 3 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 11692 times:

Here are some real life numbers taken today from a WN737-700(AC# 481)...The flight was from SAN to SJC(flt. 2958)...Conditions:

Gross Weight - 112,600 pounds
Pressure Altitude - 40,000 feet
T.A.T. - (-36) degrees
Mach - 0.80
I.A.S. - 242 knots
S.A.T. - (-61) degrees

Engine data on number 1 and 2 engines as follows:
1 N1(84.4), EGT(603), N2(89.6), F/F(2040lbs/hr), Oil Temp.(100), Oil Pres.(40)
2 N1(84.5), EGT(606), N2(89.6), F/F(2040lbs/hr), Oil Temp.(100), Oil Pres.(40)


User currently offlineOldAeroGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3824 posts, RR: 66
Reply 6, posted (11 years 3 months 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 11598 times:

During cruise, the best power settings are those that equate to operating near the best Thrust Specific Fuel Consumption (TSFC) point. This is true regardless of the number of engines on the airplane, so the engines on a Twin are working no harder than the engines on a Quad.

Evidence of this is that all types have approximately the same engine/hr shut down rate during cruise. However, a Quad is twice as likely to have an engine shutdown since it has twice as many engines.

Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 66
Reply 7, posted (11 years 3 months 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 11567 times:

There are a couple of things that could be discussed here.

1.) The rated thrust of a jet engine is at sea level, standard day. (I won't get into "flat rated") This is based on the density of the air under those conditions. As the density of the air at FL180 is about half that of sea level and it diminishes by half again at about FL360 then a jet engine rated at 36000 lbs of thrust at 100% would produce 18000 at FL180 and only 9000 at FL360. These, of course are offset by similarly reduced drag and greatly reduced fuel consumption.

2.) The thrust of a jet engine increases in non-linear fashion with increasing turbine speed. So you may get more increase in thrust between 92% and 97% than you get in going from 65% to 85%. The real power comes way up there at the top corner of the gauge. That is true until you begin to encounter various limits. You are not going to go faster, necessarily.

For that reason 85% N1 for example, is not 85% of rated thrust.

All of my numbers are figurative and not actual. They do give you the general idea though.

edit: I guess I could also mention that the wear and tear on a jet engine also increases dramatically up there at the top end of the tach. At a place where the highest temperatures are being developed, rotational speed and therefore centrifugal force are also curving up off our chart. Turbine blades can actually stretch and rub the outer case. Not a good thing.

[Edited 2005-02-04 18:33:57]

Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineMandala499 From Indonesia, joined Aug 2001, 7526 posts, RR: 76
Reply 8, posted (11 years 3 months 7 hours ago) and read 11459 times:

The thrust of a jet engine increases in non-linear fashion with increasing turbine speed.

PW and RR engines use EPR... engine pressure ratio... airpressure coming in vs air pressure going out of the engines... it's more of a linear thrust relationship... unlike N1 which is more quadratic....

For 732, Take off EPR U can go for 2.14 EPR (-17A), but mostly done with 2.10 to 1.98...

For quick thumb rules... since many have no autothrottle/LVL CH, taught by one 732 driver who is a member of this forum...

Climb thrust = 1.8 EPR + (25C-TAT) for the -15 engines, 1.9 EPR + (25C - TAT) for the -17s...

On a 280KIAS climb, leave the throttles your initial Climb thrust setting, and the EPR should change in a similar rate to the TAT, requiring little adjustment.

For cruise EPR, it's 3000kg/h/engine for 300kts@40Tons gross weight...
Cruise EPR = 1 + (CRZ FL (thousands) x3) for 40T gross weight for M0.76
For every M0.02, reduce EPR by 0.05... For 50T gross weight, add 0.1 EPR to that figure... let it settle and then adjust Big grin

So for a 50T 732 to cruise at FL300 at M0.76, 1.1 + (30*3) = 1.1 + 90 = 2.00
For 0.74 = 2.00 - 0.05 = 1.95 on the EPR... and 1.90 for M0.72 cruise Big grin

Gotta love the way they figured these out for these old babies Big grin


When losing situational awareness, pray Cumulus Granitus isn't nearby !
User currently offlineYikes! From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 284 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 11406 times:

The neat thing with modern jet powered aircraft is that the limiting factor in sub-sonic performance is the airframe. It's been this way for decades.

Engines are more and more capable of hurtling us through M1.0 for supersonic cruise. But we are limited by our airframes and current experience.

User currently offlineIL76TD From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 289 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (11 years 2 months 4 weeks 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 11384 times:

65% for il-76 at cruise

User currently offlineGulfstream From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 65 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (11 years 2 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 11272 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

I want to thank everyone for taking the time to respond. Very helpful.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Engine Power Setting At Cruise
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Piston Engine Power Problem posted Sun Jul 29 2012 07:38:17 by mawingho
Can You Hear An Aircraft At Cruise? posted Mon Jun 14 2010 13:16:17 by grimey
Engine Start Up At Gate posted Sun Jan 31 2010 16:59:54 by AT
Why Is An A/c Engine Only Efficient At High Alt? posted Mon Apr 20 2009 07:40:27 by Klemmi85
Need Help Converting Tsfc At Cruise To Sea Level posted Mon Dec 29 2008 22:21:02 by Fishfqtv
Engine Power posted Tue Nov 6 2007 07:19:06 by LH748i
Landing Lights On At Cruise Altitude posted Sun Sep 16 2007 09:14:10 by Thai744
Air Temperature At Cruise Levels posted Sun Jul 29 2007 01:12:36 by Pagophilus
Differential Power Setting (photo) posted Sat Nov 4 2006 09:26:39 by Zarniwoop
Does Engine Exhaust Glow At Night? posted Fri Aug 18 2006 15:04:45 by CURLYHEADBOY

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format