Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
DC 9 -10 - Altitude Restriction  
User currently offlineNwafflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 1050 posts, RR: 2
Posted (10 years 2 weeks 2 days 6 hours ago) and read 2894 times:

A great little plane, but I'm curious why it has been restricted to 28,000 feet. Sure, there aren't many of them left, but still curious why the altitude restriction, the last ones I was on (all NWA), seemed to climb like they wanted to keep going up forever

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineOPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 2804 times:

Just a hunch, but they may not be equipped to comply with the new RVSM airspace that recently took effect, the floor of which starts at 29,000 and goes to 41,000. (RVSM allows for 1,000 foot spacing versus the previous 2,000 feet). If an aircraft is not RVSM equipped, it has to stay out of RVSM airspace, and 28,000 would be its max altitude...

If NWA does indeed have their DC-9-10 fleet certified for RVSM ops, the particular aircraft you were on may have been non-compliant that day due to an inter-related MEL item, and may have thus been limited for a day or two until the offending item could be repaired...

[Edited 2005-02-15 21:34:50]

User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31713 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (10 years 2 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2633 times:

Makes a lot of sense.
What happens if an RVSM Aircraft encounters a snag in its Altitude measuring systems flying above FL280.Not considering stby Instruments.

Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineLongHauler From Canada, joined Mar 2004, 5349 posts, RR: 43
Reply 3, posted (10 years 2 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2585 times:

If you encounter any onboard malfunction while flying in RVSM airspace that affects your RVSM legality, then you must advise ATC right away. You may not have to descend, but the airspace ATC uses around you will reflect your reduced reliability/capability.

Never gonna grow up, never gonna slow down .... Barefoot Blue Jean Night
User currently offlineBruce From United States of America, joined May 1999, 5068 posts, RR: 15
Reply 4, posted (10 years 2 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2572 times:

I thought NWA isn't flying the -10 anymore??????


Bruce Leibowitz - Jackson, MS (KJAN) - Canon 50D/100-400L IS lens
User currently offlineGoBoeing From United States of America, joined Jun 2000, 2753 posts, RR: 15
Reply 5, posted (10 years 2 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 2544 times:

There may or may not be one or two DC-9-10s still around. If there is one or two remaining they are not and will not be certified to fly in RVSM airspace.


User currently offlineArgonaut From UK - Scotland, joined Dec 2004, 422 posts, RR: 1
Reply 6, posted (10 years 1 week 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2377 times:

It's likely it has to do with the age of the aircraft (by now most series 10s are at least 35 years old, with airframe hours to match). To prolong the fatigue life of the airframe, the permitted cabin pressure differential may have been reduced; in turn, this would restrict the aircraft's operating ceiling. I know such limitations have been imposed on other aircraft types as they reached high hours and cycles.

The RVSM airspace explanation is certainly another possibility. In either case, the DC-9-10 is unlikely to be the only type affected, as there are plenty of elderly and old-technology aircraft still in service.


'the rank is but the guinea stamp'
User currently offlineNwafflyer From United States of America, joined Jul 2004, 1050 posts, RR: 2
Reply 7, posted (10 years 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 2331 times:

Tonight, I was on a dc-9 out of FNT to DTW -- miserable weather, de-iced in FNT, then we were in the air close to 1 1/2 hours, landed on a very slippery runway in DTW (kudo's to the captain, beautiful landing). Then, another dc-9 to IND -- de-iced in DTW again, sorry, I don't remember the take off because I fell asleep, but I've been on many dc-9's at 36,000 feet (not the 10, granted)

User currently offlineTiger119 From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1919 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (10 years 1 week 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2228 times:

Quoting Nwafflyer (reply 7):
-- de-iced in FNT, then we were in the air close to 1 1/2 hours, landed on a very slippery runway in DTW

- An hour and a half flight from Flint to Detroit? What kind of routing? Via Cleveland?  Wink/being sarcastic

Flying is the second greatest thrill known to mankind, landing is the first!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic DC 9 -10 - Altitude Restriction
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Fadec Or EEC On DC-10-30? posted Sat Nov 11 2006 01:50:47 by MD11Fanatic
The Last Northwest DC-10 Flight posted Thu Nov 2 2006 21:08:48 by LemonKitty
767/DC-10 Doors posted Thu Sep 28 2006 06:31:42 by UAL757
DC-10 Towbar For An L1011 posted Thu Jul 13 2006 06:40:17 by B52murph
DC-10-30 Extra Wing Fairing posted Thu Jul 13 2006 01:53:45 by Dispatcher
DC-10 / MD-11 What's The Difference? posted Sat Jun 17 2006 23:55:28 by ContinentalGuy
Old Photo Of DC-10: Tech/ops Question posted Wed Jun 22 2005 16:38:12 by September11
DC-10 Engine Vent Question. posted Thu May 26 2005 18:32:35 by Bruspotter
DC-10/MD-11 Tail Exhaust Vents? posted Fri May 20 2005 16:19:25 by Mr Spaceman
What's This Little Door On The DC-10? posted Mon May 2 2005 01:11:49 by Starlionblue

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format