Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Does Payload Increase Wake Turbulence?  
User currently offlineSkywatch From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 921 posts, RR: 7
Posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1947 times:

My thread about heavy aircraft made me wonder if increased payload on an airliner increases the wake turbulence. For example:

744A and 744B are going in for landing. 744A is empty and 744B is full of cargo. Do they both generate the same intensity wake turbulence? Does the intensity of wake turbulence depend on the overall weight of the aircraft, or the size of the craft itself? Thanks in advance for the answers!

------Skywatch


------Forever Watchin' The Sky------
9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline727EMflyer From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1941 times:

Yes! Wake turbulence is a natural phenomenon, produced by every airfoil, whose strength is a function of aircraft weight, wing size/shape, and speed. The strongest turbulence is generated when the aircraft is slow, heavy, and operating in a clean configuration (gear up no flaps). There is lots of good information on this if you do a web search for "wake turbulence."

User currently offlineMr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2776 posts, RR: 18
Reply 2, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 1938 times:

Hello Skywatch.

I've always heard that the heavier & slower and aircraft is flying (during final approach for example), the more wake turbulence it will create.

Therefore, I believe the 747 that's full of cargo in your above scenario would cause more wake turbulence than the 747 that's empty.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ralf Drews



Chris  Smile


"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"
User currently offlineLoggat From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 625 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1885 times:

For a given airspeed, a heavier version of the same plane requires a higher angle of attack to generate the required lift. The byproduct of lift is induced drag. Induced drag increases as the angle of attack increases. Wingtip vortices (wake turbulence) increase in magnitude as angle of attack increases.

Also to note, wingtip vortices are always strongest on planes that have a large spanwise loading (ie. a large amount of weight for each foot of wingspan).

Hypothetically, if you put A330 wings (large span) on a 757, the wingtip vortices would be less intense (let's say that both pairs of wings weighed the same).


There are 3 types of people in this world, those that can count, and those that can't.
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10019 posts, RR: 76
Reply 4, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 5 hours ago) and read 1896 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

No.

But higher gross weight does.

A 757 with no passengers or cargo will still throw more wingtip vortex than a 737 with full passengers and bags. "Payload" is just one portion of the weight of an airplane.


Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineSkywatch From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 921 posts, RR: 7
Reply 5, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 1840 times:

So basically stating the facts, the only differing factors(given the same model of a/c)are the angle of attack and the extra thrust required to keep a heavier load aloft. Correct?


------Forever Watchin' The Sky------
User currently offlineLoggat From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 625 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 3 days 1 hour ago) and read 1795 times:

basically... yes

heavier you are, higher angle of attack needed for given airspeed, and more thrust required to overcome increased induced drag.

heavier you are for the same airplane model, the greater the wake turbulence created.


There are 3 types of people in this world, those that can count, and those that can't.
User currently offlineOldAeroGuy From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 3092 posts, RR: 66
Reply 7, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 3 days ago) and read 1783 times:

Quoting Loggat (Reply 6):
heavier you are, higher angle of attack needed for given airspeed, and more thrust required to overcome increased induced drag.

Usually on approach, the angle of attack is constant for a given airplane because approach speed = (1G stall speed * 1.23) so as weight increases, stall speed increases and approach speed increases.

And although thrust also increases due to increased drag, it's the increased wing circulation (ie lift) that leads to increased wake turbulence.


Airplane design is easy, the difficulty is getting them to fly - Barnes Wallis
User currently offlineMr Spaceman From Canada, joined Mar 2001, 2776 posts, RR: 18
Reply 8, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 1705 times:

Hi guys.

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 4):
A 757 with no passengers or cargo will still throw more wingtip vortex than a 737 with full passengers and bags.

Regarding a B757 and it's wing's famous ability to create a very strong wake of vortices, well a picture's worth a thousand words ..........


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Morris



Chris  Smile


"Just a minute while I re-invent myself"
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 29818 posts, RR: 61
Reply 9, posted (6 years 8 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 1724 times:

Fantastic Pic of Wake Turbulence.  bigthumbsup 
regds
MEL


Think of the brighter side!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Does Payload Increase Wake Turbulence?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
C-17 Wake Turbulence Picture posted Tue Sep 5 2006 12:06:55 by Zarniwoop
Wake Turbulence - Is There A Sop Or Qrh Procedure? posted Thu Jun 8 2006 20:23:26 by JulianUK
Supersonic Wake Turbulence posted Wed Mar 8 2006 11:11:19 by Speedracer1407
Wake Turbulence - How Is It Measured? posted Tue Dec 20 2005 16:20:28 by Alphafloor
Wake Turbulence Stories Needed. posted Thu Dec 8 2005 18:47:07 by Julesmusician
Wake Turbulence posted Fri Apr 1 2005 08:43:49 by Lehpron
757 W/Winglets And Wake Turbulence posted Thu Mar 10 2005 04:04:58 by KAUST
Wake Turbulence posted Wed Jan 5 2005 12:00:08 by Phil747
Wake Turbulence posted Sat Dec 25 2004 05:59:39 by AAFLT1871
The A380 And Wake Turbulence posted Fri Oct 8 2004 07:37:02 by Jason McDowell

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format