Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Cruise Economy And Climb Performance  
User currently offlineGlom From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 2820 posts, RR: 10
Posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 21 hours ago) and read 3181 times:

Obviously the wing has to be different to deliver both, as most obviously demonstrated in the two different wings for the 783 and 788. But it is already possible to make an adjustable wing through the use of flaps and slats. Flaps and slats give better takeoff performance but they're retracted fairly soon after takeoff and most of the climb is down with a clean wing. Isn't it possible to device a flap and slat mechanism that can be used throughout the climb to give good climb performance on a wing, which when clean gets good cruise economy?

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineProk From Netherlands, joined May 2005, 36 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 19 hours ago) and read 3156 times:

Flaps and slats will reduce the rwy length for take off. Disadvantage of flaps at climbout is the increased drag. Clean config will give you BETTER climb performance, so no need for a different flap and slat system.

User currently offline727EMflyer From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 547 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 3138 times:

Really the flaps are like the low gears in an automobile. As they are deployed, lift increases but so does drag, the result is the airplane can fly at slower speeds. Flaps can actually hinder climb performance. Unfortunately I don't know about airliners, but if I fly a C172 with full flaps I simply can not climb unless I have a good headwind.

The secret to improving climb performance lies in a blend of higher power and wings that produce less drag (other ways of reducing drag are good too). If you can get the same airspeed with a higher angle of attack and a similar amount of releative drag you should get better performance.


User currently offlinePihero From France, joined Jan 2005, 4597 posts, RR: 77
Reply 3, posted (9 years 4 months 2 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3116 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Hello,

As 727EMflyer has stated, flaps are for low speed maneuvers only and they are not used above a ball park speed figure of 230 kts.
That's the way they are designed.

As we are speaking of take-off performance, the crew has to chose between reducing the runway length necessary for a given weight and in this case,they will use high flaps settings, or if runway length is not the limiting factor, use the lowest setting to improve climb performance.

In order to climb, one has to consider two factors :
1-The engine thrust (the more thrust, the better)
2-The wing characteristics.The best angle of climb will be achieved at the best lift-to-drag ratio (aka Cl/Cd).
If one considers this ratio, a clean wing will always have a better one than with flaps extended as the high lift devices generate an absolute hell of drag rise when extended.

Taking Glom's initial question a bit further, probably all aerodynamicists and all manufacturers dream of a perfect "mission adaptative wing" which could change its aerodynamic characteristics, like thickness and curvature during each phase of flight, thus adapting to weight or maneuvering requirements as need arises. Some of this concept is already apparent on modern combat airplanes through the use of the leading edge flaps.

Regards.



Contrail designer
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Cruise Economy And Climb Performance
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
RJ And Turboprop Performance At 'hot' Airports posted Wed Mar 16 2005 14:12:52 by Horus
High And Hot Performance Of EMB 170/190 posted Sun Jan 2 2005 15:47:52 by Airline7322
CRJ-900 Climb Performance posted Fri Dec 10 2004 22:25:32 by Flyboy80
About Ailerons And Their Performance.. posted Sun Jun 13 2004 18:17:25 by HaveBlue
MD-88 Climb Performance posted Fri Feb 27 2004 18:43:44 by Delta07
A Testament To 757 Climb Performance posted Thu Apr 17 2003 00:13:01 by Rick767
Climb Performance B747-400 Vs. Airbus A380 posted Wed Dec 4 2002 07:54:48 by DBOBA
B747 Climb Performance posted Fri Jun 21 2002 06:58:01 by Mr.BA
Complex And High Performance Ratings? posted Thu Oct 25 2001 20:03:36 by USAFHummer
Start Low, Climb During Cruise, North Atlantic? posted Sun Jul 2 2006 16:36:55 by Julianuk

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format