Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Fuel Selectors: Why No Both Position On Low Wings?  
User currently offlineFLY2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 1 week 3 days 14 hours ago) and read 6892 times:

It just came to my attention that Cirrus and Lanciar don't have a both position for the fuel selectors. Why is this? I'd figure it would be pretty annoying to switch from left and right several times.

Thx  Smile

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAlias1024 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2794 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (9 years 1 week 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 6877 times:

Low wing aircraft like the ones you described never have a both position because they would violate FAR 23.951.

FAR 23.951 basically says that no fuel pump can draw from more than one tank at a time, and provisions must be made to prevent air from being drawn into the fuel supply line.

In a low wing aircraft if one fuel tank ran out, the pump would suck air from an empty tank instead of fuel from the full tank.

A high wing aircraft like the C-172 can have a both position because they use gravity to feed a reservoir, and then the fuel pumps are downstream of the reservoir. If fuel runs out in one tank, fuel from the other tank still goes to the reservoir, preventing air from getting into the fuel line. Since low wing aircraft cannot use gravity to feed a reservoir, they cannot have a both position.

I hope this helps answer your question.



It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems with just potatoes.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21804 posts, RR: 55
Reply 2, posted (9 years 1 week 3 days 6 hours ago) and read 6836 times:

Quoting FLY2HMO (Thread starter):
I'd figure it would be pretty annoying to switch from left and right several times.

You would figure correctly.  Smile

And not only that, but plenty have planes have done unnecessary forced landings because the engine stopped due to one tank being exhausted and the pilot forgetting that there was another tankload of fuel waiting to be used.

At UND, the fleet is all Pipers (low-wing). Rumor has it that the first thing ATC says after you declare an engine failure emergency is "Have you switched tanks?"

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineFLY2HMO From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (9 years 1 week 3 days 4 hours ago) and read 6821 times:

Duh, I never thought of that.  dopey 

Must be easy to feoget for people that are used to high wings and transition to low wings. I hope I never forget.  duck 


User currently offlineErj-145mech From United States of America, joined Oct 2001, 306 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (9 years 1 week 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 6792 times:

Quoting Alias1024 (Reply 1):
A high wing aircraft like the C-172 can have a both position because they use gravity to feed a reservoir, and then the fuel pumps are downstream of the reservoir. If fuel runs out in one tank, fuel from the other tank still goes to the reservoir, preventing air from getting into the fuel line.

Skyhawks don't have reservoirs or fuel pumps, everything else is correct. You won't get into a header or reservoir tank until the 205/206/210 series airplanes.


User currently offlineAlias1024 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 2794 posts, RR: 2
Reply 5, posted (9 years 1 week 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 6752 times:

Quoting Erj-145mech (Reply 4):
Skyhawks don't have reservoirs or fuel pumps, everything else is correct

I should have been more specific. I am referring to the newer fuel injected models like the 172S. My PIM shows a reservoir along with 2 fuel pumps. I don't know if older 172's with carburetors need the fuel pumps or not.

[Edited 2005-11-20 22:45:00]


It is a mistake to think you can solve any major problems with just potatoes.
User currently offlineStoicescu From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (9 years 1 week 2 days 12 hours ago) and read 6729 times:

The Piper Warrior II I fly has only L/R and Off positions. Start on the fullest tank and check it from time to time. A nice way to do it is USE the clock. Say the time says x:xx I will stay on L until the minutes show y:yy check it and if applicable switch. Hey at least you don't have to worry about hitting the flaps with your head all the time  Smile

Quoting Mir (Reply 2):
At UND, the fleet is all Pipers (low-wing). Rumor has it that the first thing ATC says after you declare an engine failure emergency is "Have you switched tanks?"

it won't help at all... it probably sucked enough air to make it unusable


User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21804 posts, RR: 55
Reply 7, posted (9 years 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 6720 times:

Quoting Stoicescu (Reply 6):
it won't help at all... it probably sucked enough air to make it unusable

Apparently not, because reportedly it fixes the problem most of the time.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineShyFlyer From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (9 years 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 6716 times:

In the TBM700, the fuel selector switches between the left and right tanks automatically.

User currently offlineAjd1992 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 9, posted (6 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 hours ago) and read 6222 times:

You're right, it is annoying.

Even more so, because i'm really anal about having uneven tanks  Silly Thanks for explaining why low wing aircraft can't have a dual setting - I've always wondered why.


User currently offlineAskr From Poland, joined Mar 2008, 45 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 22 hours ago) and read 5910 times:

My first post on a-net, so please don't bite  Smile

Couldnt it be possible to place a pump bellow the lowest tank?
Obviously, there woldn't be much space left for a reserviour, but could just the plumbing, with non-return valves just under the tanks be enough to keep the pump fed?



ATC-PL Wanabe :) - 2nd application is in... 11 July...
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21804 posts, RR: 55
Reply 11, posted (6 years 8 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 5877 times:



Quoting Askr (Reply 10):
Couldnt it be possible to place a pump bellow the lowest tank?

I imagine it would, but then you'd have to have at least three fuel pumps in the plane (one for each tank to feed the reservoir and another to feed the engine - add another if you want a backup). That's just more things that can fail on you, as well as more weight and complexity. It isn't worth it - just remember to switch tanks every so often.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently offlineBE77 From Canada, joined Nov 2007, 455 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (6 years 8 months 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 5628 times:

BE77 Skippers (circa 1979-1981) are low wing, with an electric fual pump under the engine (just behind the nose wheel), and the tank options are simple...OFF and BOTH. There is no L or R option. Tanks cross feed themselves...when on a solo X-C you have to be sure to load as much of the baggage / misc stuff in the plane to the far right to counterbalance the pilot weight to keep things level (not really noticeable in flight - but the little offset is enough that by landing you have all the remaining fuel in the left tank!)


Tower, Affirmitive, gear is down and welded
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Fuel Selectors: Why No Both Position On Low Wings?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why No Reverse Thrust On Landing In ATL? posted Fri Feb 8 2008 17:12:26 by BR715-A1-30
Why No Wing Fences On Tailplanes? posted Thu Jan 3 2008 10:13:57 by Faro
Why No Retractable Gear On Aerobatics Planes? posted Thu Nov 2 2006 20:54:17 by QFA380
Why No Tail Antenna On 707-100B Originals? posted Sun Apr 3 2005 23:26:38 by Thrust
Why No Logo Lights On Most Flights? posted Sun Mar 20 2005 14:40:18 by Skywatch
Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic? posted Thu Oct 31 2002 07:24:47 by Tsufang@ci
Why No US. Reg Numbers On Wings? posted Fri Apr 28 2006 16:45:00 by Access-Air
Why No Upper Wings On Wide-bodies? posted Wed Sep 15 2004 14:17:51 by KLMCedric
Why No Paint On Wings? posted Wed May 5 2004 12:55:05 by A380900
Why No Tabs On Wings? posted Fri Dec 14 2001 06:11:02 by David B.
Why No Reverse Thrust On Landing In ATL? posted Fri Feb 8 2008 17:12:26 by BR715-A1-30
Why No Wing Fences On Tailplanes? posted Thu Jan 3 2008 10:13:57 by Faro
Why No Retractable Gear On Aerobatics Planes? posted Thu Nov 2 2006 20:54:17 by QFA380
Why No Tail Antenna On 707-100B Originals? posted Sun Apr 3 2005 23:26:38 by Thrust
Why No Logo Lights On Most Flights? posted Sun Mar 20 2005 14:40:18 by Skywatch
Why No Wing Let On 744 Domestic? posted Thu Oct 31 2002 07:24:47 by Tsufang@ci

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format