Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
LOC And Appr Modes On A318  
User currently offlineAvro85 From Belgium, joined Jun 2005, 236 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2345 times:

Hi all,

I have a question regarding both LOC and APPR mode on the A318.

I was told by a pilot that when doing an ILS approach you first select the LOC mode until the localizer is established and then you select the APPR mode to catch the GS.
is this true ? Because from what I know, in other planes i.e the B727, you directly select the APPR which will first intercept the localizer and then the GS.

I doubt the above statement I was told is true since it would mean that the APPR mode of the new airbus planes is less sophisticated than on the B727....

Anyway, some help would be appreciated.


Cheers
Chris


[Edited 2005-12-03 16:19:10]

[Edited 2005-12-03 16:19:57]

10 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineWing From Turkey, joined Oct 2000, 1560 posts, RR: 24
Reply 1, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2334 times:

I am not sure about the 318 but on the 320 and 321 you can select the approach button directly when you are cleared for an ILS approach.I dont see why 318 should be any different though.

The only time I use the LOC button when you are cleared only to intercept localiser and the approach clearence is issued later by the ATC.Also it may be a good idea to use the LOC button first if you are outside of the 8/18 NM cone to prevent a false capture with other airport in the vicinity.



Widen your world
User currently offlineAvro85 From Belgium, joined Jun 2005, 236 posts, RR: 2
Reply 2, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 2330 times:

Alright, many thanks for your answer Wing.

User currently offlineJush From Germany, joined Apr 2005, 1636 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 2317 times:

You can hit the Appr button immediately but you can use LOC first as well.
How things are handled in different airlines? I don't know. But i guess it's a question of how long your approach is anyways.

Regds
jush



There is one problem with airbus. Though their products are engineering marvels they lack passion, completely.
User currently offlineJulesmusician From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 2295 times:

Ah there are reasons behind this. Often when on approach air traffic will place you at an altitude and ask you to let you know when you have captured the localiser. Obviously if ATC have given you an altitude they want you to be at then if you hit the APPROACH button you will start trying to find the localiser and the glideslope and start ascending/descending to capture it, that is why ATC often ask you to stick to localiser and an altitude first.

Typical approach ATC conversation on the last bits of approach:

"descend 4000ft, QNH 987, turn 210 degrees, contact when localiser established speed 180 knots please"

then

"descend on the ILS, speed now 160 knots until 4 DME"

So it is useful to have both features.


User currently offlineVuelingAirbus From Spain, joined Aug 2005, 113 posts, RR: 1
Reply 5, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2282 times:

Quoting Julesmusician (Reply 4):
if you hit the APPROACH button you will start trying to find the localiser and the glideslope and start ascending/descending to capture it, that is why ATC often ask you to stick to localiser and an altitude first

The autopilot or flight director does not capture the glide slope before capturing the localizer. The plane will not decent and if you capture the LOC and you are above the glideslope it will not capture either. ATC often asks you to only lock on the localizor (and descent and maintain altitude) if you have parallel runway operations to protect the other traffic from overshooting the LOC and as soon as you are established you get the approach clearance. The localizor established call is normally used to hand you over to tower for the landing clearance.


User currently offlineAvro85 From Belgium, joined Jun 2005, 236 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (8 years 8 months 3 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2276 times:

Thanks again for your inputs. I know now that we were both correct. The APPR on the 320 family would do the job as well, but due to operations it is sometimes asked to only establish on LOC while holding at specific altitude.



Quoting Wing (Reply 1):
Also it may be a good idea to use the LOC button first if you are outside of the 8/18 NM cone to prevent a false capture with other airport in the vicinity.

But there could be some interferecne with different localizers from different close airport as well then. I mean the GS pattern has a smaller range than the LOC pattern. So if the GS can interfere the LOC can certainly as well.... OK it's less dangerous to be off centered for a while than at a wrong altitude on aproach  Wink

Chris


User currently offlineJetlagged From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 2546 posts, RR: 24
Reply 7, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 2231 times:

Quoting Avro85 (Thread starter):
Because from what I know, in other planes i.e the B727, you directly select the APPR which will first intercept the localizer and then the GS.

A 727 with APPR mode? An unheard of luxury for production 727s I think, even the -200adv  Smile



The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
User currently offlineNAV20 From Australia, joined Nov 2003, 9909 posts, RR: 36
Reply 8, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 2219 times:

I'd have thought that it's a matter of 'discipline'. You're cleared to intercept the runway line, but you're not cleared to descend until you get landing clearance. So you've got no business programming the aeroplane to descend anyway at that early stage.

In the event of something going wrong ahead of you the controllers will be busy! They're entitled to assume that you'll continue on the vector/altitude assigned to you until further advised. Not go ahead and start down anyway.  Smile



"Once you have flown, you will walk the earth with your eyes turned skywards.." - Leonardo da Vinci
User currently offlineVuelingAirbus From Spain, joined Aug 2005, 113 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 6 days 7 hours ago) and read 2205 times:

Quoting NAV20 (Reply 8):
You're cleared to intercept the runway line, but you're not cleared to descend until you get landing clearance.

The landing clearance has usually nothing to do with the approach. The approach controller or director will issue an approach clearance and that includes the vertical profil as well. According to ICAO standard phraseology you will get instuctions (speed, heading, altitude...), advisories (traffic, wake turbulence...) and clearances (take off, approach and landing). If you are not cleared it will sound like that (ALN = AirLinersNet):

ALN 221, left turn heading 300 to intercept localizer 27L descent and maintain 4000 feet until further advised.

or in case of clearance:

ALN 221 , descent 4000 feet, turn left heading 300 final vector, you are cleared for the ILS 27L, advise established.

And there are busy airports like paris cdg with parallel runways where you MUST intercept the localizer if you are on an intercept course (according frensh authorities), which is not an approach clearance. However an approach clearance ALWAYS includes the vertical profil as well.

hope that helped


User currently offlineWing From Turkey, joined Oct 2000, 1560 posts, RR: 24
Reply 10, posted (8 years 8 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 2164 times:

Quoting Avro85 (Reply 6):
But there could be some interferecne with different localizers from different close airport as well then. I mean the GS pattern has a smaller range than the LOC pattern. So if the GS can interfere the LOC can certainly as well.... OK it's less dangerous to be off centered for a while than at a wrong altitude on aproach

A false capture is a little bit different than you have imagined. Wink If you are cleared for the APPROACH at 30 NMs you select the LOC first and press the APP button around 20-18 NMs.



Widen your world
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic LOC And Appr Modes On A318
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Flaps And Speed Brakes On Landing Question posted Mon Sep 27 2004 05:29:52 by TriJetFan1
NAVaids And GPS Points On Airways posted Sun Mar 14 2004 09:13:28 by Tayloss
747-300 With GE Engs. And Rich Posn On Start Lever posted Thu Sep 4 2003 18:43:35 by Rohan737
Pilots And Mechanics View On The Fokker 100? posted Sun Mar 23 2003 02:07:11 by Patroni
Flight And W & B Sheets On The Net? posted Thu May 2 2002 13:56:01 by Gullfaxi
What Does A Winglet Do, And Why Not On 777s posted Thu Aug 16 2001 01:09:22 by Digitalone
Grime And Grease On Control Areas. posted Sun Oct 1 2006 20:19:02 by 747hogg
Use Of EPR On PW And RR Powered 744s posted Wed Sep 6 2006 08:17:08 by Windshear
Spray Deflector On B717, MD80s And MD90s? posted Fri Aug 25 2006 22:21:31 by Ferret
Dangerous Goods And Refrigerators On Aircraft posted Mon Jul 24 2006 06:19:51 by Spinaltap
Fly By Wire And Electrical System On A330-200?! posted Tue Jun 2 2009 07:11:13 by Swissair A330
GPS Problems And Its Effects On Aviation posted Thu May 21 2009 01:09:19 by ArniePie
Global Warming And The Effect On Aviation? posted Fri May 9 2008 11:51:33 by ZuluAviator994
Global Warming And The Effect On Aviation? posted Fri May 9 2008 11:51:33 by ZuluAviator994
Biggest And Smallest Wheels On Airliners? posted Sat Dec 1 2007 16:18:50 by UAL747
How Will Gnss And RNP Impact On Civil Aviation Ops posted Sat Mar 31 2007 20:20:18 by Ammunition
Biggest And Smallest Wheels On Airliners? posted Sat Dec 1 2007 16:18:50 by UAL747
How Will Gnss And RNP Impact On Civil Aviation Ops posted Sat Mar 31 2007 20:20:18 by Ammunition

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format