Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Usual High-altitude Wind Speed?  
User currently offlineKeta From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 448 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 13360 times:

Hi all,

I have seen many times planes flying in 150 kt winds at high altitude, I have heard even 245 kts tailwinds. That's by far faster than the fastest wind at ground level (excluding tornadoes), which I see obvious. But are these speeds normal? What is the usual speed of wind at high altitude? I guess pilots should know this.  Wink

Thanks!


Where there's a will, there's a way
19 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17055 posts, RR: 67
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 13342 times:

Quoting Keta (Thread starter):
I have seen many times planes flying in 150 kt winds at high altitude, I have heard even 245 kts tailwinds. That's by far faster than the fastest wind at ground level (excluding tornadoes), which I see obvious. But are these speeds normal? What is the usual speed of wind at high altitude? I guess pilots should know this.

These speeds are not unusual. Jetstreams can move at hundreds of knots. There's not ground stuff in the way to stop them  Wink



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlinePhilSquares From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 13331 times:

Quoting Keta (Thread starter):
What is the usual speed of wind at high altitude?

Just operated a flight from HKG-ANC, 13 Dec, and off the coast of Japan, we had 270/255 knots of wind! It was great, nice smooth ride. Those winds lasted for about an hour. When we got in the NOPAC they had died down to about 120knots and as we went further east, they gradually went to 0. Abeam SYA the winds were light and variable. About 200NM out of ANC, they picked up slightly to about 280/40.

All in all, typical winds for this time of year.


User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 3, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 13320 times:

One of the reasons for these high speeds is the fact that so many of the world's major cities are found in latitudes near the boundary between the Ferrell Cell (temperate air circulation zone) and the Arctic or Polar Cell. The area where these meet is the location of the jetstream. So the most often flown air routes lie within a few hundred miles of the jet core.

Away from the jetstream, out in the middle of the cells, the flow in the middle of the air masses seems to be around 30-60 knots quite often. Compared with the surface winds that may still seem high, but remember there is no surface friction, hills, trees, buildings etc. to slow it down.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineArcticTern From India, joined Dec 2005, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 13295 times:

245 Knots, well is this speed of winds at high altitudes?

What will be the stress on an aircraft? If its 255 is the wind speeds what will be the IAS?

Thanks,
Sushant



I wanted to fly even before I knew how to pronounce the word 'Pilot'
User currently offlinePhilSquares From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 5, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 13282 times:

Quoting ArcticTern (Reply 4):
245 Knots, well is this speed of winds at high altitudes?

What will be the stress on an aircraft? If its 255 is the wind speeds what will be the IAS?

The speeds were at FL330. Our indicated speed was M.852. There really isn't any stress on the aircraft at all. Sometimes if you have to cross the jet you will experience some turbulence but that's about it.


User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 6, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 13280 times:

Quoting ArcticTern (Reply 4):
245 Knots, well is this speed of winds at high altitudes?

What will be the stress on an aircraft? If its 255 is the wind speeds what will be the IAS?

That is very high, even for the jetstream. A hundred knots or more is quite common though.

The IAS has nothing to do with wind speed. The IAS will be whatever the pilot commands. The groundspeed will be the algebraic summing of the true airspeed and the wind. This should be covered in your groundschool.

It will not place any stress on the airplane to fly in 245 knot winds because the airplane will not resist those winds but will just be carried along by them. The air, through which the plane is flying is simply moving in some direction at that speed. It is something like the effect of the earth's rotation on your house - there isn't any. Amazing, but your home is moving east at about 891 knots right at this moment. Can you feel that in any way?

Then there is the orbital speed of the earth around the sun, around sixty seven thousand miles per hour. We don't feel that either. Nor the orbit of the sun around the center of our galaxy which has to be tremendous. We don't feel any of it because we are carried along with it. It is only when we are in a fixed place that we can perceive the relative motion of the air passing us. That is why wind is more important during takeoff and landing than at any other time.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineTornado82 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 7, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 13274 times:

Normally about the only thing I'm qualified to post in here on tech ops is a meteorlogy based question. However today, SlamClick did a great job, as did PhilSquares' real-world experience. If this was a union I'd get you guys for stepping on my toes, haha. Instead I'll just RU you guys, as I should have long ago.

To go a little further, 245kt is definitely not the norm, and honestly the fastest I've ever heard of actually being measured. T'is the season though.

These jet streams are common in areas of strong temperature gradient, such as the strong one running SW-NE in the area of our storm system last week in the Eastern US. Generally speaking, along and just ahead of a cold front you'll have a strong SW to NE running jet stream, along a warm front a NW-SE running one, typically weaker. This goes along with the ideas of troughs and ridges. Typically if you want to make the best time going east go just south of the coldest air to find the jet for your tailwind. Stronger storm centers are typically associated with a phasing (coming together of) the polar front jet, and the subtropical jet, as we saw last week. This is relatively common from the SE US and then up the east coast.


User currently offlineArcticTern From India, joined Dec 2005, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 8, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 13271 times:

Hi Slam,

Wonderful response, indeed! now about the IAS,

IAS is correct to get RAS, RAS corrected for height, temp will give TAS

TAS +- winds will give G/S

Correct me if i am wrong.

I should have used the TAS instead of IAS, I apologies!

Thank you.
Sushant



I wanted to fly even before I knew how to pronounce the word 'Pilot'
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 9, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 13257 times:

Quoting ArcticTern (Reply 8):
Correct me if i am wrong.

Not sure. I've never used the term RAS. What is common here is:

Directly off the airpspeed indicator you get:

IAS - Indicated airspeed


Which, when corrected for installation error gives:

CAS - calibrated airspeed


Which when corrected for compressibility gives:

EAS - equivalent airspeed


Which, when corrected for altitude and temperature gives:

TAS - True airspeed


True Airspeed is what is used in flight planning. As I might have said, the algebraic summing of TAS and wind factor (speed and direction relative to your speed and direction) gives us GS or groundspeed which is the only thing that is going to tell us how long it takes to get to point B.

Airplanes with air data computers and flight management computers can show us IAS, TAS, GS, OAT, TAT all at once. The old whizwheel got retired to my flight bag and eventually left at home. Of the above speeds we pilots never really deal with CAS or TAS. Those things are more for the performance engineers.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17055 posts, RR: 67
Reply 10, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 5 hours ago) and read 13213 times:

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 6):

It will not place any stress on the airplane to fly in 245 knot winds because the airplane will not resist those winds but will just be carried along by them. The air, through which the plane is flying is simply moving in some direction at that speed. It is something like the effect of the earth's rotation on your house - there isn't any. Amazing, but your home is moving east at about 891 knots right at this moment. Can you feel that in any way?

Then there is the orbital speed of the earth around the sun, around sixty seven thousand miles per hour. We don't feel that either. Nor the orbit of the sun around the center of our galaxy which has to be tremendous. We don't feel any of it because we are carried along with it. It is only when we are in a fixed place that we can perceive the relative motion of the air passing us. That is why wind is more important during takeoff and landing than at any other time.

If it weren't for replies like this Einstein would be turning in his grave right now  Wink



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineKeta From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 448 posts, RR: 0
Reply 11, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 19 hours ago) and read 13151 times:

Thanks for you replies! So, I see that 60 kts or more are kind of normal.
Do you know what is the highest wind-speed ever measured?  Smile



Where there's a will, there's a way
User currently offlineChksix From Sweden, joined Sep 2005, 345 posts, RR: 4
Reply 12, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 13146 times:

Is there a way to get those wind data online like the METAR's are published now?

For use in flightsims that is...



The conveyor belt plane will fly
User currently offlineZeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 9113 posts, RR: 75
Reply 13, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 18 hours ago) and read 13141 times:

Quoting Keta (Thread starter):
But are these speeds normal? What is the usual speed of wind at high altitude? I guess pilots should know this.

Yes these are normal, they are seasonal, occour around the same time every year. The jetstream that passes over japan is know to have the strongest core speed of any jetstream, its known to go over 300 kts.



We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
User currently offlineBellerophon From United Kingdom, joined May 2002, 583 posts, RR: 59
Reply 14, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 13 hours ago) and read 13116 times:

SlamClick

...I've never used the term RAS...

Rectified Air Speed (RAS) is IAS which has been corrected for instrument and installation errors, which, as you point out, means it is the same as CAS.

CAS seems to be the preferred modern term; I only came across RAS in some old British aerodynamics books, when I was learning to fly an old British aircraft.  Wink

Regards

Bellerophon


User currently offlineTornado82 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (8 years 9 months 3 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 13089 times:

Quoting Chksix (Reply 12):
Is there a way to get those wind data online like the METAR's are published now?

It's not the easiest thing to read in text format. But here's the second best thing, for the continental US anyways...

http://www.rap.ucar.edu/weather/upper/upaCNTR_250.gif


User currently offlineTurnit56N From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 16, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 12989 times:

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 3):
One of the reasons for these high speeds is the fact that so many of the world's major cities are found in latitudes near the boundary between the Ferrell Cell (temperate air circulation zone) and the Arctic or Polar Cell. The area where these meet is the location of the jetstream. So the most often flown air routes lie within a few hundred miles of the jet core.

You know, I never put two and two together before, but this does explain a lot. Well put. Learning occured today, at least for me.

Today, near the jetstream we had a 123 kt wind at FL350. On other days, farther away from it I've seen as low as 15 kts at FL330. The lowest I typically see is in the 30s, as was mentioned. I haven't yet been fortunate enough to get the 200+ tailwinds yet, though.

Quoting Chksix (Reply 12):
Is there a way to get those wind data online like the METAR's are published now?

I only know how to get the text of the winds aloft for the continental US. If you're interested in browsing that, the site I prefer is ADDS ( http://aviationweather.gov/products/nws/winds ). Clicking on a sector will bring up the text forecast of the winds aloft for that sector. If you can find the text for winds aloft in Europe, I'd assume that they'll be in a similar format. Since you can read a METAR, the winds/temp aloft should be pretty easy to decode.

For example, today in the southeast US an exerpt from the winds aloft reads:
FT__3000__6000___9000___12000___18000___24000__30000__34000_39000
RDU 0613 2909+01 2822-02 2732-06 2652-16 2687-26 760642 760852 750961

(They line up better on the actual chart)

The first line simply gives the altitude for each forecasted block of winds and temps below it. In each block, the first two digits are direction, the next two digits are velocity, and the last two digits are temperature. So, for this line RDU is Raleigh Durham, the station these winds are forecasted over. [0613] under the 3000 means that at 3,000 feet, the winds are 060 at 13kts. [2909+01] under the 6000 means that at 6,000 feet, they're 290 at 09kts. The +01 means that the temp is +01 Celsius at that altitude.

They're all pretty much similar until you get to 30,000', where it says [760642]. Since they only have two digits to tell velocity, they have to do something different when the wind gets over 100kts. 50 is added to the first two digits (the direction) to denote that the wind is over 100kts. Subtract 50 from the first two digits to get the actual wind direction. That leaves 26, so the wind direction is 260. The next two digits are 06, so that would make the wind 106 kts. The last two digits are still temperature, but above 24000 feet it's assumed that all temps are negative, so they don't bother with the sign. The temp is -42 C.

Someone correct me if I messed any of that up. I haven't had the privilege of reading winds aloft every day since I left instructing. When I was a CFI and hanging around the wx computers all day I would use the winds aloft maps to see where the strongest part of the jet stream was and then I'd check the text to see what some of the specific numbers were in the that area just for fun. Today over the US, it looks like Northern KY is getting the strongest winds, with a forecast of 754354 at FL340. In other words, 250 at 143kts. A few hundred miles away in SD, the same altitude is forecasted to have 331556, or winds that are 330 at 15kts.


User currently offlineChksix From Sweden, joined Sep 2005, 345 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 12948 times:

Thanks for that very useful information!


The conveyor belt plane will fly
User currently offlineSunriseValley From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 5016 posts, RR: 5
Reply 18, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 12863 times:

This chart covers quite a lot of air space..

http://www.flightplanning.navcanada....t/anglais/Latest12-FD_FL340-e.html


User currently offlineSunriseValley From Canada, joined Jul 2004, 5016 posts, RR: 5
Reply 19, posted (8 years 9 months 2 weeks 1 day ago) and read 12856 times:

The following site covers much of the Pacific and Indian Ocean..
http://www.bom.gov.au/cgi-bin/difacs.cgi?0196
You have to log on to bomw0007 the password is aviation


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Usual High-altitude Wind Speed?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Artcc Center Freqs High Altitude? posted Wed Dec 7 2005 02:25:04 by Wardialer
High Altitude Cruising posted Wed May 18 2005 10:10:33 by Ar1300
Calculating Wind Speed And Direction posted Fri May 13 2005 21:02:54 by TimRees
High Altitude Penetrations posted Mon Mar 14 2005 07:11:52 by Jhooper
ISA Altitude And Speed Chart Help posted Tue Jan 11 2005 16:26:56 by Delta07
What Restrictions Exist At High Altitude Airports? posted Tue Sep 28 2004 14:19:01 by Mozart
Maximum Wind Speed For A 737 To Land? posted Tue Sep 21 2004 15:45:57 by Justplanecrazy
High Altitude Endorsement posted Sun Sep 5 2004 06:21:33 by Jourdan747
777 High Altitude Landing Possible? posted Mon Mar 15 2004 03:07:55 by Mrniji
Flap Setting For High Altitude 747 posted Sat Nov 1 2003 18:30:07 by Tarzanboy
High Altitude Airport And Long Range Airplane posted Sat Oct 9 2010 18:10:51 by juanchito
High Altitude Aerodynamics posted Thu May 7 2009 23:57:17 by ElpinDAB
ERJs At High Altitude Airports posted Sun Apr 19 2009 10:34:00 by AF022
High Altitude Homebases posted Sat Mar 7 2009 07:26:05 by Speedbird741

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format