Donder10 From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 6659 posts, RR: 23 Posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 1032 times:
I was wondering if anybody could tell me what wide-bodied planes are most economical to run comapred to each other. What would you compare the A330 to?
Suggestive comparison:
A340-500/B777-200
A340-600/B777-300
CPDC10-30 From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2000, 4759 posts, RR: 26 Reply 1, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 5 hours ago) and read 995 times:
It is impossible to compare the economics of the A340-500/600 and the B777-200/300 for the mere fact that neither of the Airbuses have yet generated a single penny in revenues for an airline.
A330-200/767-400 is valid, maybe HB-IWC would know...?
Sia772er From Singapore, joined Aug 2000, 62 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 2 days 3 hours ago) and read 992 times:
People in this forum usually compare
A333 vs B772
A343 vs B772er
in the near future i think it would be
A345 vs B772LR
A346 vs B73LR
regards,
sia772er
ps. no A vs B war, rite?
A330-243 From United Kingdom, joined Mar 2001, 251 posts, RR: 2 Reply 3, posted (12 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 15 hours ago) and read 982 times:
Comparing the A340 and B777.
From what I have read (mostly on these forums), the A340 will burn a little less fuel on long haul flights. The difference is very small. Because the A340 is designed to be operated strictly as a long haul plane, it may well be true.
Regarding maintenance issues I would think the twin engined 777 would be cheaper.
Its a good question Donder10. It will be interesting to hear the responses of others who may have access to performance data of these a/c.
Certainly other factors will be considered. Routes, engines etc.