Mastropiero From Spain, joined Dec 2005, 133 posts, RR: 0 Posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3556 times:
Hi everyone, first post here. Always been passionate about flying, aircrafts and all that surrounds them. Unfortunately, what I work in has but little to do with all this world....
So, to the topic: last week I flew from MAD to CIA with VY. As you may know, at the moment they only fly A320-214. Well, on approaching I realized that the captain was waiting very long to extend the flaps. When he did, it was exactly two minutes before touchdown, already inbound. He also waited that long to lower the landing gear as well. Of course, this led to a moment of big sudden deceleration, something most pax didn´t enjoy too much. I have to say, it was up until that moment the fastest descent/approach I´ve ever seen.
Could there be any particular reasons for doing this? Would it be considered "bad" flying? Could he actually have been instructed to keep such high speed until that point?
I´ve flown a fair amount of times in the last 5 years, and I´ve seen many different approach techniques, but this was quite intriguing. At one point I even wondered whether he was considering landing with no flaps. I know that´s an absolute no-no, been discussed here not too long ago, actually, but for a moment I thought it´d happen.
Wing From Turkey, joined Oct 2000, 1601 posts, RR: 23
Reply 2, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3546 times:
Its not unusual,to keep higher approach speed until the final stages of the approach.The ATC may ask you for a high speed approach to create enough seperation or the pilot may delay the flaps depending on his operational needs.
Keta From Germany, joined Mar 2005, 449 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 16 hours ago) and read 3524 times:
Something similar happened to me two weeks ago. On a flight from MAD to BIO on an IB A319, we were already on finals and no flaps were deployed. Then the landing gear was lowered, but still no flaps. I was thinking "what, are we going to land with no flaps?" We were very close. But half a minute or so before touchdown they lowered the flaps, and a normal touchdown. But I also thought why they did that. Shortly after us, another plane arrived, so maybe they were, as you guys say, asked by ATC for high speed.
Zeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 10730 posts, RR: 76
Reply 4, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 3512 times:
Gear speed is normally above flap speed, so to slow down on the ILS, get the gear down (at idle thrust clean you will gain speed on a typical ILS), decelerate, and run the flaps as you reach the limit speed (company of manufacturer) for that stage.
Often can get a pitch down with this sort of approach as the flaps run, which the ears will pick up as deceleration as well as the real deceleration, its how an airline simulator tricks pilots ears in thinking they are accelerating in an aircraft.
We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
Stoicescu From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3470 times:
Landing without flaps dangerous? --> Depends of the pilot's skill but I will say not really!
Will it get you fired if there wasn't a problem that kept you from extending them? --> Very probable!
The problem with no flaps landings is that you come fast and you will need more rwy in ground effect to bleed off speed.
And no I don't think it was bad flying I believe they ware instructed by ATC to keep the speed up or dive a bit for the rwy. Me as a pilot I want to do my Landing Checklist as soon as possible I don't see any reason to postpone it until the last moments. And I am sure other pilots think the same way and if it was indeed bad flying it was probably bad Workload Management and also bad CRM (not the case I believe)
ArcticTern From India, joined Dec 2005, 89 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3408 times:
About the sudden deceleration, this is caused due to suddent use of flaps, usually you gradually increase the flaps but if use tend to lower your flaps suddenly from 0 to 40 degree, the camber or the curvature of the wing is increased and this attracts alot of drag.
If your inside the airplane, you will be able to feel a sudden drop.
About lowering of flaps 2 minutes to touch down, i would not be able to comment, It all depends on the conditions, ATC instructions and also what the pilot was thinking at that moment.
Hope this helps and correct me if i am wrong.
I wanted to fly even before I knew how to pronounce the word 'Pilot'
HAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31875 posts, RR: 54
Reply 7, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 3367 times:
Since We don't know what exactly the crew was doing.Its all speculation.
I would think also that ATC instructions to speed up had something to do with it.
Also remember Landing Gear & Flaps both have a do not exceed speed for Extension respectively which has to be kept under control to avoid structural damage to the related equipment.
BuckFifty From Canada, joined Oct 2001, 1316 posts, RR: 18
Reply 10, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 5 days ago) and read 3325 times:
Quoting Chksix (Reply 9): Could be fuel consumption issues too...
Delaying the "dirtying up" of the plane and flying idle power approaches saves fuel.
I don't think any airline will endorse late flap deployment as a 'fuel saving technique'. If there was any saving at all, it would be quite marginal. So this concept is benign, so to speak.
But late flap deployment does happen sometimes, although different SOP's will have different limits set on how late the aircraft must be in landing configuration. We have been on finals where flaps don't come out until 2500 feet or so, and have everything configured by 1500. Non-standard gear deployments aside, this happens more frequently than you think. As said above, in the U.S., to keep separation, this happens on a daily basis.
Again, it is safe to do it, as long as you're within company guidelines.
VuelingAirbus From Spain, joined Aug 2005, 113 posts, RR: 1
Reply 11, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 3304 times:
I fly the route sometimes and I have some comments about it. First we have a monitoring system and if we are not stabilized by 1000 feet (fully configured, spool up and check list done) a go around is mandatory. Second the approach to 16L/R goes via TAQ VOR and gives you a very long base (descend planning is kinda difficult in FCO). Sometimes they vector you for 40 miles and sometimes you get almost unreal shortcuts (hard to predict). So if that was the case they might just dived down and decelerated at the last minute. Third (and in my opinion the most probable) it was a standard approach considering the following. We have medium loads in winter and we are therefor about 10 tons below max landing weight. That gives a low clean speed which is around 190 to 195 kts (Flaps 2 can be selected below 200 kts). So they intercepted the ILS probably in clean configuration and thats at 2000 feet in FCO. It is not uncommon to have up to 15 kts tailwind there in approach and you land with about 7-10 kts tailwind and they still prefere 16 L/R for noise abatement. That gives about 2,5 to 3 minutes before we start to extend flaps and gear. And by the way the terrain is falling a lot coming from TAQ or BOL VOR and so the visual suggest you are very close to the ground, however you are still high above threshold elevation.
Quote: "A no-flap landing is a very serious event. It is much more serious than an engine failure or fire.
You will have the crash trucks standing by. You will very probably blow all the maingear tires. You are about 70/30 going to have to evacuate the passenges down a slide, unless you flew around long enough for them to position a stair truck with the crash trucks.
In a big jet airliner you are never going to do a no-flap landing unless it is absolutely unavoidable."
Quoting Stoicescu (Reply 5): The problem with no flaps landings is that you come fast and you will need more rwy in ground effect to bleed off speed.
At 1000 ft/min descent rate, above max tire ground speed, and a nose-up angle high enough to only narrowly avoid a tailstrike, you're not spending any time in ground effect. An A320 has some significantly different flying characteristics from your training aircraft.
Quoting Stoicescu (Reply 5): Will it get you fired if there wasn't a problem that kept you from extending them? --> Very probable!
I disagree. If you, as the PIC, have plausible reason to believe there is an emergency, and especially if you declare one, you are allowed to deviate from any regulation necessary to achieve safe outcome of the situation. An investigation may show that (for example) the flap fault indication was not accurate, but if you acted correctly in the situation, you would not be fired, fined, cited, or otherwise punished for such actions.
It's always OK to interpolate the facts, stretch the data, and even make a guess, but it's wise to qualify your statements as such, especially in this forum.
Bri2k1 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 988 posts, RR: 3
Reply 14, posted (10 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3175 times:
Capt. Lim has a problem with spelling, too. Maybe the fire engines were there for looks? By the way, the plane in that funny story did land with flaps. The consequences of landing without them are not discussed there. Please refer to my post above for relevant information.