Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Tcas Not Standard?  
User currently offlineChiguire From Venezuela, joined Sep 2004, 2005 posts, RR: 15
Posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 3127 times:

As I just came across an article in a newspaper saying that a mid-air crash was avoided because one of the aircraft was equipped with TCAS, I was asking myself if this system was not a standard in all civil aircraft.

In this case a DC9 from Aeropostal, that was enroute from Caracas to Puerto Ordaz received a warning by TCAS. An aircraft of another (not mentioned) airline had a loss of cabin pressure and left its cruising altitude until finally being on the same level as the VH aircraft.
Due to the warning system the VH pilot could react and change his route to avoid a crash.

I am sure that all new aircraft are equipped with TCAS, but there seem to be some older ones that don't have TCAS. Why is there no international regulation forcing ALL airlines to put the system in their older aircraft ?

Here the source (in spanish):

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineBBJII From United Kingdom, joined Jul 2005, 850 posts, RR: 4
Reply 1, posted (10 years 5 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 3107 times:

Some DC9's don't have Tcas....It depends on the original owner.

It was not standard on the aircraft and was an extra that airlines added.

Some countries do not require aircraft to have TCAS.

Brazil/Bolivia/Most of Africa/Central Asia - Not required.

India is the ONLY country that requires ALL aircraft have TCAS.
Aircraft without TCAS are subject to escort at Inflated fees.


Remember: The Bird Hit You, You Didn't Hit The Bird.....
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31875 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (10 years 5 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3028 times:

Quoting BBJII (Reply 1):
India is the ONLY country that requires ALL aircraft have TCAS.

Remember TCAS is a Deffered item under MEL.

Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineTbanger From Australia, joined Jul 2004, 266 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (10 years 5 months 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3016 times:

Quoting Chiguire (Thread starter):
An aircraft of another (not mentioned) airline had a loss of cabin pressure and left its cruising altitude until finally being on the same level as the VH aircraft.

In Oz RPT (Regular Public Transport) aircraft with 30 seats or more are the only aircraft required to have TCAS (at the moment). Our Metro 23's do not require TCAS yet they scoot along quicker than our Saabs do.

Maybe the 2nd aircraft mentioned above, was a Kingair, B1900, M23, E120 or similar type that wasn't required like a lot of other countries.

User currently offlineBroke From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1325 posts, RR: 3
Reply 4, posted (10 years 5 months 6 days 15 hours ago) and read 2988 times:

For a long time TCAS was not required on freighters or military transports, but a couple of spectacular near misses and a midair off the west coast of Africa between a Luftwaffe TU-154 and a USAF C-141B changed that.
The most spectacular near miss, I know of, was been a Kaletta L-1011 and a FedEx DC-10. They were both at 350 on crossing tracks over the central US (Kansas??) when the controllers realized the possible conflict, but they couldn't make radio contact. The controllers watched as the target merged. The DC-10 crossed in front of the L-1011 filling the windshield with airplane.
A real skivey stainer for the Kaletta crew.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Tcas Not Standard?
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Flare Or Not To Flare? posted Mon Oct 30 2006 09:58:37 by GlobalVillage
How Effective Is Tcas? posted Tue Oct 3 2006 21:13:39 by MarkBoston
Seeing Oncoming Clouds - Not On Weather Radar posted Mon Sep 25 2006 21:40:28 by JulianUK
Transponders And Tcas Low Level Question posted Tue Aug 22 2006 23:08:26 by Julianuk
Why 737 Are Not Consider A STOL. posted Mon Jul 24 2006 18:42:06 by 747400sp
Why Not More (quick) Stops On Longer Flights? posted Sun Jul 16 2006 15:38:25 by Pavlin
Lettering On Wings: Why Not Done Anymore? posted Fri Jul 14 2006 03:52:03 by Airwave
SAS 737 And Light Aircraft, Tcas Incident, Norway posted Mon Jun 5 2006 21:54:00 by MerlinIIIB
Tcas False Alerts Or No Action Needed Alerts? posted Sat May 27 2006 18:48:13 by JulianUK
Engine Stator/guide Vanes- Why Or Why Not? posted Sun Apr 30 2006 18:31:29 by MissedApproach

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format