Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
GE GE4/J5P & PW JTF-17 Size  
User currently offline747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3501 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 5789 times:

Hello Everybody

I was wondering about the size of the GE4/J5P and JTF-17 after burning engines. Since I been in the Navy I developed a fascination with after burning engines. Seeing that the GE4/J5P and JTF-17 could produce 60,000 lb + of trust with afterburners, it got me to thinking how big are these engines. The B-1 F-101 is 55 " in diameter and just produce 30,000 lb + of trust. So I just wanted to know, what is the diameter and length of these after burning monsters.

12 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13169 posts, RR: 78
Reply 1, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 5 days ago) and read 5747 times:

Not got the data for the GE4, but I know a man who probably has, Air Net member B2707SST.
Had it flown, it perhaps would have put the noise of 4 x Olympus 593's, reheated on take off, into perspective?


User currently offlineF14D4ever From United States of America, joined May 2005, 319 posts, RR: 4
Reply 2, posted (8 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 5709 times:

Quoting 747400sp (Thread starter):
The B-1 F-101 is 55 " in diameter

Av Week and every other source list that same 55" figure, but I suspect that's installation envelope, not fan tip diameter, which is the parameter you really need to work with for airflow & thrust comparison purposes. Fan tip diam. will of course be a little bit less than envelope, but I don't know how much.

"Eight Decades of Progress", the 'official' history of GE Aircraft Engines, doesn't list any specific dimensional data for the GE4. Judging from photos in the book, I'd guess the GE4 fan tip diameter is 60-65 inches. I'd be interested to know the actual value. I'll continue searching while we await Mr. B2707SST's response.



"He is risen, as He said."
User currently offlineB2707SST From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 1369 posts, RR: 59
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 4 weeks 12 hours ago) and read 5594 times:

Hello 747400sp,

As GDB and F14D4ever mentioned, I do have some technical data on the GE4 and JTF17.

The GE4-J5P variant for the Boeing 2707 was a single-stage turbojet intended to generate 63,200 lbs. augmented thrust. Rotating machinery comprised nine compressor stages and two turbine stages. Engine diameter was 74.2 inches, length was 308 inches, and weight was around 10,500 lbs. each. Mass flow was 620 lb/sec. On test at rated takeoff thrust, the mass flow was found to be slightly higher and noise slightly lower than anticipated.







Late in the SST program, the 2707's weight had ballooned beyond the original 675,000-pound estimate, the aerodynamic efficiency of the fixed-wing -300 had degraded significantly compared to the swing-wing, and jet noise had become a crucial issue. To resolve these problems, the mass flow was to be increased to 720-815 lb/sec, with the latter more likely. The afterburner was to be deleted, which was also proposed on the improved Olympus for Concorde "B", and new noise suppressors were proposed. Thrust would have increased to well over 70,000 lbs. The increase in mass flow would have required 2 inches more diameter and would have increased total aircraft gross weight by 40,000-50,000 lbs. as the effect of the heavier engine cascaded through the airframe. The program was (mostly coincidentally) canceled about a month after these changes were proposed.

The JTF17A-21L proposed for the Lockheed L-2000 was a low-bypass turbofan with afterburning capability in the bypass duct only (a "duct-burning turbofan"). It was to generate 60,760 lbs. of augmented or 38,130 lbs. of non-augmented thrust at takeoff. Bypass ratio was 1.3:1. I know I have seen more detailed specs for the JTF17 but can't find them at the moment. As of late 1966, it was considerably shorter and "fatter" than the GE90 and was somewhat heavier and more expensive as well.

Normally, one would expect a turbofan to be quieter than a turbojet. Boeing's specifications included figures for both GE and PW power, and according them, the JTF17A created just as much sideline noise (117 PNdB) and was actually noisier than the GE4 during takeoff (95 PNdB vs. 104 PNdB) and landing (107 PNdB vs. 116 PNdB).

Given Concorde's FAA noise figures, it looks like the 2707-100 would have been significantly quieter on takeoff and approach. This is understandable because the swing-wing provided L/Ds more than three times greater than a double-delta at low speeds, so climb rate at a given thrust is greater and less power is needed for a given descent rate, respectively. With the fixed-wing 2707-300, though, all bets are off. Note that neither takeoff nor landing figures incorporate operational procedures like decelerating approaches. The extra thrust of the GE4s does come out clearly on the sideline measurement. For the 2707, the noise figures below do not include actual GE4 test data or new silencer designs that came later in the program.

 ConcordeB2707
Takeoff119.5 PNdB104 PNdB
Sideline112 PNdB117 PNdB
Approach117 PNdB107 PNdB


--B2707SST

[Edited 2006-03-04 23:16:21]


Keynes is dead and we are living in his long run.
User currently offlineF14D4ever From United States of America, joined May 2005, 319 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 5468 times:

Quoting B2707SST (Reply 3):
I do have some technical data on the GE4 and JTF17 .

Thanks for posting.

Quoting B2707SST (Reply 3):
Engine diameter was 74.2 inches

Is that fan blade tip diameter or total engine envelope diameter?

Quoting B2707SST (Reply 3):
The JTF17A-21L proposed for the Lockheed L-2000 ... was considerably shorter and "fatter" than the GE90...

"Fatter" than the GE90? That's amazing.



"He is risen, as He said."
User currently offlineB2707SST From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 1369 posts, RR: 59
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 5421 times:

Quoting F14D4ever (Reply 4):
Is that fan blade tip diameter or total engine envelope diameter?

I believe total diameter, but I'd have to do some more checking.

Quoting F14D4ever (Reply 4):
"Fatter" than the GE90? That's amazing.

Oops, that should have been GE4. An engine the size of the GE90 would not do well at supersonic speeds!

--B2707SST



Keynes is dead and we are living in his long run.
User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (7 years 6 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 5172 times:

If I recall, the JTF-17A produced 53,000 lbf dry...

You're sure only the afterburner is only in the fan duct? Or do you mean the core AND the fan-duct?

Andrea K


User currently offlineStarglider From Netherlands, joined Sep 2006, 678 posts, RR: 44
Reply 7, posted (7 years 6 months 6 days 22 hours ago) and read 5149 times:

Quoting B2707SST (Reply 5):
I believe total diameter, but I'd have to do some more checking.

Maybe the table i posted as reply 6 in the thread "General Electric GE-4 Nozzle", started by Blackbird is of help?


Regards,
Starglider


User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 8, posted (7 years 6 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 5108 times:

74.2 to my knowledge is overall diameter...

Andrea K


User currently offlineStarglider From Netherlands, joined Sep 2006, 678 posts, RR: 44
Reply 9, posted (7 years 6 months 5 days 9 hours ago) and read 5086 times:

Quoting Blackbird (Reply 8):
74.2 to my knowledge is overall diameter...

74.2 is exhaust nozzle diameter of the GE4/J5P, its compressor inlet diameter is 60.6.


Starglider


User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 6 months 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 5072 times:

When I said overall diameter, I meant the diameter of the widest part of the engine, which generally is the nozzle.

Andrea K


User currently offlineB2707SST From United States of America, joined Apr 2003, 1369 posts, RR: 59
Reply 11, posted (7 years 6 months 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 5055 times:

Interesting to see this thread come back from the dead! Here is some additional JTF-17A data sent to me by a correspondant several years ago. I'm not sure where it comes from and can't completely vouch for accuracy, but I don't see any obvious mistakes either:

PRATT & WHITNEY JTF17A

Type: Two-shaft axial turbofan with duct heater.

Intake: Annular, titanium, no inlet guide vanes.

Compressor: Low pressure system consists of titanium case, two fan stages, titanium & Waspaloy blades & disks, bypass ratio 1.3:1, mass flow 687 lbs/sec.

High pressure system consists of titanium case, six compressor stages, titanium and Waspaloy blades & disks, compression ratio 13:1.

Combustor: Gas generator and duct heater combustors are advanced annular ram induction burner designs housed in Waspaloy cases. No diffusers - - velocity head of air provides a turbulent burning zone.

Turbine: High Pressure turbine is one stage, air cooled, with cobalt-nickel alloy disk and cobalt-nickel alloy blades, directionally solidified precision cast method, in Waspaloy case. Turbine Inlet Temperature is 2,200 degrees F, 2,300 degrees F for takeoff only.

Low Pressure turbine is two stages; otherwise same as high pressure turbine.

Exhaust: Reverser/Suppressor section with fixed convergent-divergent exhaust nozzle for primary gas stream, variable nozzle on duct exhaust, variable ejector, clamshell doors inside R/S section, aerodynamically actuated flaps at end of R/S section, tertiary air blow-in doors at front of R/S section, integrated advanced thrust reversal and noise suppression system.

Dimensions: Inlet diameter - 69.3", Reverser/Suppressor diameter - 80", Length - 215"

Weight: 10,500 lbs

Performance:

Thrust ConditionsRatingSFC
Takeoff - augmented, SLS:61,000 lbs1.78
Takeoff - dry, SLS:38,300 lbs0.76
M2.7 Cruise - partial augmentation:12,770 lbs1.56
M0.9 Cruise - partial power:5,010 lbs1.10


--B2707SST



Keynes is dead and we are living in his long run.
User currently offlineBlackbird From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 12, posted (7 years 6 months 4 days 2 hours ago) and read 5050 times:

I would have almost swore that it produced 53,000 lbf dry. If it's not the JTF-17A's max dry power, I kind of wonder where I derived the 53,000 lbf figure from?

Andrea K


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic GE GE4/J5P & PW JTF-17 Size
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Jet Engines (GE, PW, And RR) posted Sat Sep 17 2005 21:37:59 by NASOCEANA
GE 90-94B Vs RR Trent 895-17 posted Mon Jun 10 2002 01:18:01 by BOEING747400
PW Or GE? posted Sat Jun 1 2002 20:34:03 by Tango-Bravo
777 Engines - GE/PW/RR - Biggest? posted Thu Apr 19 2001 15:04:55 by Blackened
MBF & IE7 posted Fri Nov 24 2006 16:17:53 by HAWK21M
A&P Jobs With USAir In PHL posted Tue Nov 14 2006 08:58:20 by MXSUP
Aicraft Procedure & The Airlines posted Sat Nov 4 2006 04:13:07 by HighFlyer9790
Farnsworth D-15 & Lantern Colour Test posted Tue Oct 31 2006 21:31:45 by YVRtoYYZ
MCD & Ground Runs posted Sat Oct 28 2006 06:38:11 by HAWK21M
Plane Certification & Manufacture Location posted Thu Oct 26 2006 11:34:43 by Zarniwoop
Is The 787 More Quiet Than The A380 Both RR And GE posted Sun Aug 1 2010 20:59:53 by Aeroflot001
GE A330 Designations And Weights? posted Fri Jun 18 2010 11:31:06 by EA772LR

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format