Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
MD-80 Engines  
User currently offlineAS907 From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 49 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 10 hours ago) and read 2357 times:

Hi everyone. This is the first topic I have started here on A.net! While working at ANC, I would get to see AS MD-80s close up and noticed something different with the engines. It looks as though they are parallel to the ground while the fuselage has a slight downslope to it. At the time, it looked like there was a huge difference in the angle between the two, but I can't find any pictures in the database that show it very well. I was just curious... was I imagining this huge difference in the angle? And if not, what are the benefits of having the engine not parallel with the fuselage? Thank you.



View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Albrecht



6 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineAeroWeanie From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 1609 posts, RR: 52
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2338 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Yes, the engines on the MD80 are mounted with about 2.8 degrees of pitch. This is to align the engine with the downwash behind the wing.

User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17040 posts, RR: 66
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 2314 times:

They are also toed out, that is the intakes point outwards in the vertical plane. Wing mounted engines are toed in instead. This is all to align with airflow.


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineSpeedracer1407 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 333 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 4 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 2265 times:

I remember a previous thread that discussed the same thing. I can't remember for sure, I think some posters opined that, while the engines were mounted with a bit of pitch, the intakes, and thus the whole nacell, were mounted with even more pitch, thus giving the impression of a dramatic difference between the angle of the fuse and the angle of the engines.


Dassault Mercure: the plane that has Boeing and Airbus shaking in their boots.
User currently offlineMX757 From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 628 posts, RR: 12
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 4 weeks 23 hours ago) and read 2206 times:

Quoting AeroWeanie (Reply 1):
Yes, the engines on the MD80 are mounted with about 2.8 degrees of pitch. This is to align the engine with the downwash behind the wing.



Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 2):
They are also toed out, that is the intakes point outwards in the vertical plane. Wing mounted engines are toed in instead. This is all to align with airflow.

It's funny, the little things like that. I worked DC9/MD-80's exclusively for 3 years back in the mid 90's and I never paid any attention to engine pitch and toe out angles. I guess I was too busy fixing the damn things. Interesting little tidbit though. Thanks for the info.  Smile



Is it broke...? Yeah I'll fix it.
User currently offlineNonfirm From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 434 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (8 years 6 months 4 weeks 22 hours ago) and read 2195 times:

Quoting MX757 (Reply 4):
It's funny, the little things like that. I worked DC9/MD-80's exclusively for 3 years back in the mid 90's and I never paid any attention to engine pitch and toe out angles. I guess I was too busy fixing the damn things. Interesting little tidbit though. Thanks for the info

I have been working on them for 14 years and went and looked at them again tonight i never noticed either that is because as an MD mech you only get to look at the side of the Eng.  scratchchin 


User currently offlineAirgypsy From United States of America, joined Nov 1999, 130 posts, RR: 2
Reply 6, posted (8 years 6 months 4 weeks 3 hours ago) and read 2043 times:

The MD-80 grew from the DC-9 in several ways. It got longer, so they put a longer landing gear on the MD-80 to keep the tail from dragging on takeoff (kept the same nose gear). The wing is bigger so, they added a Zero (0) slat instead of renumbering the others.
I was with PSA and worked both MD-80s and DC-9 30s. Hated the dirty thirties because they were real head bangers and tail draggers. The "dragster" rake of an MD-80 does look cool.
Airgypsy


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic MD-80 Engines
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Why MD-80's Engines Are Facing Upwards? posted Fri Mar 26 2004 05:03:46 by Jgore
When Did The MD-80 Ever Have JT8D-209 Engines? posted Thu May 29 2003 00:19:07 by BR715-A1-30
AA/TWA MD-80's.....Same Engines? posted Sun Aug 25 2002 00:38:26 by Flyingbronco05
MD-80 And AS 261 posted Thu Nov 23 2006 03:13:59 by MissedApproach
MD-80 Cockpit Noises posted Sun Sep 24 2006 11:29:51 by Speedracer1407
MD-80 Elevator Position On The Ground posted Mon Aug 28 2006 18:17:01 by ALbyDAL
AA MD-80 Avionics-related Diversion posted Sat Aug 19 2006 17:43:51 by Rthrbeflying86
A Few MD-80 Questions posted Thu Aug 10 2006 05:30:54 by Alaska737
Object On Back Of MD-80 Nose Gear posted Fri Aug 4 2006 22:21:00 by WHPBUR
First MD-80 With Winglet? posted Sat Jul 15 2006 01:08:41 by September11

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format