Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
757 Altitude Limit With Downed Computer  
User currently offlineRunallnight From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 2 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 2161 times:

Hello, new member here... March 17 I rode NW #780, LAS-MSP on a 757.
We turned back to the gate while taxiing towards takeoff; the pilots said
that one of the computers had failed to boot up correctly. After several
minutes of repair work, they said the (new?) computer seemed OK but
that the APU would not start again and thus we would wait a bit more to
bring out the external starter equipment. It got a bit warm in the cabin
since the air conditioning was not going. Finally the A/C came on (APU?)
but the crew announced that the computer problem had returned.

Here is the crux of my question - at this point the crew said that we could
proceed despite the downed computer, but at reduced altitude. This cut
fuel efficiency, so they had the fueling folks come by to top us up. Once
in the air, the only altitude announcement was 27,000 feet. We had taken
off late by somewhere around 1:15 to 1:30, and arrived late by about 1:15,
so we seemed to have made good airspeed or had a good tailwind or did
well with air traffic.

Anyway, why would loss of one (out of multiple?) computer prior to takeoff
cause a restriction of altitude on a 757-200?

5 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 10 hours ago) and read 2130 times:

Quoting Runallnight (Thread starter):
We had taken
off late by somewhere around 1:15 to 1:30, and arrived late by about 1:15,
so we seemed to have made good airspeed or had a good tailwind or did
well with air traffic.

We'll I'm not a pilot, but a friend that is said the winds aloft have been screaming lately. He had one east-west leg that was 1.0... his return trip west-east was .5 !!!!

Your problem sounds some what RVSM related, but how I don't know which computer was acting up.

[Edited 2006-03-19 18:41:19]


"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineFr8Mech From United States of America, joined Sep 2005, 5344 posts, RR: 14
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2115 times:

Well, it all depends on the computer. The B757 has dozens of them. We call them black-boxes but they're computers.

Why would it cause an altitude restriction? The only computer that comes to mind, without looking at the MEL, is the Pac Controller. But it would require a total failure of the controller, rare.

I don't think a failed FMC (flight management computer) imposes a flight level restriction, but it may.

Hard to say what the problem was without knowing more specifics.



When seconds count...the police are minutes away. Never leave your cave without your club.
User currently offlineGrbld From Netherlands, joined Dec 2005, 353 posts, RR: 3
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 17 hours ago) and read 1976 times:

No, a failed FMC doesn't impose an altitude restriction. Heck, half our 737 fleet flies on one only. There probably was something going on with the pressurizatioin system.

The thing is, that you say that you were able to proceed, despite the inop computer, but at a reduced altitude. Reading your message literaly, it doesn't say that the inop computer CAUSED the flight at reduced altitude.

It could've well been that due to busy airspace, the flight plan had to be re-filed at a lower level in order to avoid further delays. Or it could've been another thing totally unrelated to the inop computer that caused the lower level to be filed.

Grbld


User currently offlineFredT From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 2185 posts, RR: 26
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 1885 times:

Or it could be a flight crew taking the easy way out, saying something everyone is familiar with broke down rather than open up for endless questions about what a PACK is, fear among pax about flying with something broken in the system without which, surely, they would suffocate... "right?"... while everyone has seen computers break down with few ill effects on life in general.

Cheers,
Fred



I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
User currently offlineGoldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 5970 posts, RR: 14
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 1865 times:

Most aircraft are certified up to FL250 with a pack deferred. FL270 would be the top of the lower portion of non-RVSM airspace. The upper portion would begin above 41,000 feet, but, in most cases, you would still need RVSM capability to get up there.

Part 91 appendix G lists RVSM equipment as:

-2 independantly operating altitude measurement systems (altimeters.)
-at least 1 automatic altitude control system (autopilot with altitude hold.)
-an altitude alerter system.
-TCAS (can be waived.)

Also needed is an RVSM qualified crew.



Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic 757 Altitude Limit With Downed Computer
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
757 EPR Limit posted Tue Aug 2 2005 01:20:02 by Taguilo
FL 240 Climb Limit With AC Pack Inop - Why? posted Wed Jan 8 2003 18:54:46 by Mr Spaceman
Line Of Sight With Regard To Altitude posted Fri Dec 9 2005 21:06:53 by THVGJP
Forward Slip On Final With 757? posted Sat Mar 5 2005 15:29:12 by AvroArrow
TAS And IAS Changes With Altitude. posted Tue Sep 14 2004 11:04:47 by GunFighter 6
757 Stop With No Reverser? posted Wed Mar 24 2004 21:14:04 by Joerock7415
Tech Issue With An AA 757 posted Wed Oct 2 2002 13:50:04 by RickB
Odd Things Afoot With A Delta 757... posted Wed Nov 29 2000 06:36:28 by Blconn
UPS 757 Landing At Night W/o Lights? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 08:00:51 by Motopolitico
A&P Jobs With USAir In PHL posted Tue Nov 14 2006 08:58:20 by MXSUP

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format