Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Extended Range  
User currently offlineAa737 From United States of America, joined Oct 1999, 849 posts, RR: 0
Posted (14 years 4 months 2 days 9 hours ago) and read 2319 times:

I have a few questions about ER aircraft.

1) I belive to make a plane ER, the manufacurer just makes the planes have a higher maximum take off weight so that they can carry more fuel. Am i right or is there more to it?

2) Why do airlines operate ER and non-ER version of the same aircraft? (example: UA 777-200s) Wouldn't it be easier to have all the planes the same? In the case of UA, if all the 777s were 772ERs they could use any plane on any route and not worry during planning about if the plane will have the range. If you don't need the range is it more economical to use the non-ER version?

Can anyone offer a little help here?

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineCitation From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (14 years 4 months 2 days 8 hours ago) and read 2228 times:

There is more to it than that.
There has to be additional electrical generator capability, additional fire suppresant capability in the baggage compartment, the engines have to meet certain historical shutdown rates per flight hours, plus more things.
The correct term for ER operations is ETOPS (Extended Twin OPerationS).
I don't think may ETOPS aircraft have additional fuel capability.

I have flown 757 ETOPS from SFO to Maui, LAX to Maui, 767-200 ER from Chicago to Manchester, England.

Regarding question 2
The airlines that have both ER and non-ER aircraft in their fleet have a large enough fleet that they don't need the commonality, and the expense of configuration and maintaining all their aircraft in the ETOPS configuration.


User currently offlineFlying-tiger From Germany, joined Aug 1999, 4161 posts, RR: 36
Reply 2, posted (14 years 4 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2210 times:

Don´t forget that many airliners become an -ER after they are in service for some time. This is the reason why airlines operate both the non and the -ER version.

Regards
Flying-Tiger
http://fly.to/rorders The regional plane orders page



Flown: A319/320/321,A332/3,A380,AT4,AT7,B732/3/4/5/7/8,B742/4,B762/763,B772,CR2,CR7,ER4,E70,E75,F50/70,M11,L15,S20
User currently offlineJet Setter From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (14 years 4 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 2203 times:

ETOPS aircraft cost more to buy and more to operate, as they have to meet higher minimum equipment and maintenance standards - plus carry more equimpment, like back up generators, liferafts etc.

Because of this airlines usually only have the number of ETOPS aircraft they actually need, the rest of the fleets being standard variants. If the airline wants total flexibiity they can have an all ETOPS fleet, but an airline the size of United is large enough to justify operating non-ER 777s.


User currently offlineYaki1 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (14 years 4 months 1 day 9 hours ago) and read 2167 times:

I disagree with what has been stated concerning ETOPS and ER versions of an aircraft. ER are different aircraft models from the manufactrer ( higher MTOW etc.) whereas ETOPS is the authorization to operate twin engine aircraft overwater for an extended period. An ER aircraft is only ETOPS if the airline operates per the requirements, not all ETOPS aircraft are ER models.

User currently offlineZRH From Switzerland, joined Nov 1999, 5566 posts, RR: 36
Reply 5, posted (14 years 4 months 12 hours ago) and read 2138 times:

I agree with Yaki1. ER and ETOPS is not the same. ETOPS is only for twin jets. They have the authorization to reach the next airport within 120 or 180 min with only one engine working.
ER means "extended range". There are also ER aircrafts with three engins, for example the DC 10-30ER (Swissair has flown them). These a/c have normally a higher maximum take-of weight, they carry more fuel.


User currently offlineDesertJets From United States of America, joined Feb 2000, 7776 posts, RR: 16
Reply 6, posted (14 years 3 months 4 weeks 17 hours ago) and read 2108 times:

For your first question basically ER's are designed to carry more fuel. And ETOPS is seperate. But of some note, a lot of airlines that have mixed fleets of ERs and non-ERs, Say United with their 762's and 772's they operate all aircraft at ETOPS specs (though I could be mistaken now about the 762s since they only do transcon flights) for maintance commonality. And remember UA was the launch customer for the 777 and the IGW version was not available for about 18 months.


Stop drop and roll will not save you in hell. --- seen on a church marque in rural Virginia
User currently offlineCitation From Sweden, joined Nov 2005, 0 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (14 years 3 months 4 weeks ago) and read 2092 times:

According to the Boeing web site, the difference between a 777-200 and 777-200ER is fuel capacity, max takeoff weight (545,000 vs 656,000), and different thrust engines (77,200 vs 90,200).
There may also be differences in a beefed up landing gear for the higher gross weights; takeoff and landing.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Extended Range
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus Payload/Range Charts posted Mon Oct 23 2006 03:39:30 by Ruscoe
A320 Range From Dublin/EIDW posted Tue Sep 19 2006 18:00:33 by Lasno
Citation X With Higher Range - Possible? posted Mon Sep 11 2006 21:34:05 by A342
767 300 ER travel range posted Sat Sep 9 2006 07:37:43 by Qwame
Long Range Aircraft On Short Range Flights posted Thu Aug 10 2006 12:48:02 by LPLAspotter
Flying 737 With The Wet Compass Extended. posted Sat Jul 29 2006 19:45:36 by SlamClick
Summer Temperatures And Fuel And Range posted Fri Jul 21 2006 11:00:09 by Oly720man
A Link For Airbus Load/ Range Charts posted Thu Jul 13 2006 18:41:57 by SunriseValley
New Engines For Concorde - Fuel Burn / Range? posted Fri Jul 7 2006 23:36:55 by A342
Range And Payload posted Sun May 28 2006 12:54:58 by Newagebird

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format