Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Flying Airbus, Flying Boeing...  
User currently offlineBio15 From Colombia, joined Mar 2001, 1089 posts, RR: 7
Posted (13 years 8 months 2 days ago) and read 1534 times:

I'm a true Boeing fanatic, and part of this is due to the flight deck. I find the joystick on airbus's fly-by-wire system something very awkward. The joystick is supposed to give the pilot visibility over the instrument panel. But does the Boeing yoke really interfere visually with anything on the panel?
Besides, for those who have flown any of the two, don't you get a better feel of controlling the aircraft when grabbing the controls with both hands rather than with your left? (or right hand for co-pilots)

Airbus

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Ryan Gaddis


Boeing

Click for large version
Click here for full size photo!

Photo © Joe Corrigan





3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineMax Power From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 1, posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 1485 times:

If a yoke was better than the "stick" and give more feel why would not they be in today's fighters all over the world?. Yokes are old tech. Just like props, "Props are for boats not planes"  Smile

User currently offlinePrebennorholm From Denmark, joined Mar 2000, 6545 posts, RR: 54
Reply 2, posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1484 times:

Dear Bio15,
I'm a true Boeing fanatic. And Airbus fanatic. And, and...

From a pilot who has flown A-4 fighters, B737s and now A320:

The sidestick takes minutes rather than hours to get used to. But there is a lot to learn when transferred from B to A or visa versa. The philosophy of many aspects of the flight management systems are rather different, if not very different, and the sidestick contra yoke comes in as a very minor issue in this respect. It is the visible issue, the others are "hidden" for we laymen in the FMS software.

You mention "better feel, grabbing the controls with both hands". There is no difference here. When actually handflying the planes, which happens sometimes as little as one percent of the actual flight time, then the PIC has his left hand on the yoke or sidestick and right hand on the throttle. And the FO the other way around.

One great advantage of the sidestick configuration is that it makes room for a foldable table which is very convenient for paperwark and meals etc.

I asked my friend, if FBW systems had been invented BEFORE the airliner, and not the other way around, would then anybody have got the idea to put a yoke on an airliner? His answer was short: "No". If computers had been developed to the 1975 level already in 1930, then both Douglas DC-3 and Boeing 247 had been flying with sidestick control.

Since yoke contra sidestick is a valid issue, then I never understood why both Boeing and Airbus didn't make both an option on all their FBW planes. The reason why the haven't done so can only be that it is such a minor issue.

Best regards, Preben Norholm



Always keep your number of landings equal to your number of take-offs, Preben Norholm
User currently offlineJG From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (13 years 8 months 1 day 1 hour ago) and read 1477 times:

I have seen photos of the 320 prototype it was fitted with both a yoke and a sidestick.... and perish the thought "steam" analog instruments. Guess they were not sure themselves as they got into the project.

Better move on to the duplicate thread... this one is in error.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Flying Airbus, Flying Boeing...
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Airbus And Boeing Trim System Differences. posted Fri Sep 29 2006 05:37:17 by JetMech
Bank Angle Protection Airbus And Boeing Question posted Sun May 21 2006 12:00:09 by JulianUK
Question For Airbus And Boeing Pilots posted Sat Nov 27 2004 09:43:25 by AirxLiban
Piloting An Airbus Vs Boeing posted Fri Nov 12 2004 21:32:02 by Aa777jr
Airbus Or Boeing-easier To Fix? posted Tue Jun 1 2004 21:53:15 by Espion007
Virgin's Airbus And Boeing Routes posted Thu Aug 30 2001 12:46:09 by Sergy2k
UAL Airbus Vs. Boeing posted Thu Jun 14 2001 06:23:56 by Concorde1518
Airbus And Boeing Pilots posted Sat Jun 2 2001 17:29:44 by F.pier
Specific Airbus And Boeing Problems posted Mon May 21 2001 01:03:19 by A388
Rolls-Royce Boeing 747 Flying Test Bed posted Wed Jul 26 2006 12:43:03 by CCA

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format