Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A Smaller Twin Engines BAe 146 Design?  
User currently online747400sp From United States of America, joined Aug 2003, 3736 posts, RR: 2
Posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3803 times:

The 737 is pretty much a smaller twin engine 707 design. Back in 80's and early to mid 90's I notice must of the flights coming from SFO to LAX was 737 and BAe 146. When I see a KC-135R it look more like a large wing four engine 737. For a little over 10 years when I see a 707 or 707 base plane and think of all those 737 and BAe 146. It got me to Wondering, what if BAe build a twin engine plane base on BAe 146/ RJ's. It would have had the same high wing and T tail design as the BAe 146/RJ's, but it would been very light weight and use on very short range flights like Santa Barbra to LAX or SAN or from small airport to smaller airports deep in country area. It could have been to go from big inland airports to very near by smaller inland airports. It could have been built a long side the BAe146. So do you think this could have worked back in the 80's and 90's when BAe/ RJ's was still being built.



PS: It name could have been BAe 176.

4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineGDB From United Kingdom, joined May 2001, 13241 posts, RR: 77
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3792 times:

BAe had a similar thought. In the early 1990's the original 'RJX' (not to be confused with the upgraded 4 engine version cancelled in 2001), was a twin.
BMW/RR engines, a choice of fuselage lengths, IIRC artists impressions even included winglets.

But BAe decided not to proceed, just carrying on in a niche market with the upgraded BAe-146, the Avro RJ.
In doing so, assuming a RJX service entry in the mid 1990's, they lost out on the regional jet boom.


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17118 posts, RR: 66
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 3792 times:

They could do that, but I would think the design has been surpassed by the more recent large Embraers.

I guess it would look something like this:

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Doug Owens




"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineKBGRbillT From United States of America, joined Sep 2004, 155 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 6 days ago) and read 3725 times:

I was also thinking of the Do-328Jet and how about this Russian An-148 that's in the works. Fits your description very well and is supposed to be certified in Russia this year!


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Fyodor Borisov




View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dmitry Karpezo



User currently offlineDEVILFISH From Philippines, joined Jan 2006, 4938 posts, RR: 1
Reply 4, posted (8 years 6 months 3 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3710 times:

Quoting GDB (Reply 1):
In doing so, assuming a RJX service entry in the mid 1990's, they lost out on the regional jet boom.

I, too, would have loved a BAe twinjet. In hindsight, BAe might indeed have foregone some sales, but they also saved on development costs, considering the subsequent fall of the regional jet market. Which was bigger is open to speculation.



"Everyone is entitled to my opinion." - Garfield
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic A Smaller Twin Engines BAe 146 Design?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
BAe 146/RJ Overhead Panel posted Mon Nov 13 2006 15:17:27 by Kris
Braking/Spoilers On BAe-146 posted Tue Oct 17 2006 13:55:24 by Smoose
BAe 146 - Here To Stay? posted Sat Jul 22 2006 01:53:29 by BoeingOnFinal
BAe 146/RJ Throttles Question posted Wed Mar 15 2006 14:01:30 by Kris
Aer Lingus BAE-146- Ferry Flights posted Mon Oct 31 2005 12:55:13 by EI747SYDNEY
Does The BAe 146/Avro RJ Use The Coanda-effect? posted Tue Sep 20 2005 20:40:09 by AmericanB763ER
Bae 146/Avro RJ Horizontal Stabilizer posted Fri Jun 3 2005 00:11:07 by AOMlover
What Is This For (On The Bae 146) posted Sun Aug 15 2004 15:47:02 by DeltaWings
BAe-146's Strange Flap Canoe Fairings - Why? posted Thu Sep 25 2003 23:43:45 by Mr Spaceman
BAE 146 posted Thu Aug 8 2002 18:22:10 by AA777
BAe 146/ RJ Vs 737 Classic Which Burn More Fuel? posted Tue Jan 2 2007 00:04:00 by 747400sp

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format