Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
GPS/RNP Approaches  
User currently offlineZarniwoop From United Kingdom, joined Apr 2005, 265 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 3958 times:

Did a search so I apologise if its already been posted....

An interesting video from westjet on flightglobal.com about the benefits of GPS/RNP approachs.

http://www.flightglobal.com/Articles...quired+navigation+performance.html

Seems like Canada is taking up GPS/RNP approaches quicker than most places (correct me if I am wrong), is this due to the nature of the terrain?
Do you think these approaches will become wider spread? From what I understand you need extra equipment and training but if it lowers minimums and increases safety I guess it is worth the investment.

Comments?

2 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineZeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 9210 posts, RR: 76
Reply 1, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 3953 times:

Quoting Zarniwoop (Thread starter):
Seems like Canada is taking up GPS/RNP approaches quicker than most places (correct me if I am wrong), is this due to the nature of the terrain?

Australia has had a wider implementation of the approaches as the domestic DME frequency spectrum was sold off for TV broadcast. One of the concessions was a replacement of the system with GPS.

The Australian GPS approach design was adopted by ICAO as the international standard. They are straight in approaches.

US designed approaches initially were just overlays of existing NDB or VOR approaches.

The have approaches to many airports where the only approach available is GPS, also have approaches to oil rigs, hospitals, roads (outback highways for the flying doctor) by GPS.

The QF 737s have been doing RNP 0.1 approaches into an airport in New Zealand, I cannot remember which one.

Quoting Zarniwoop (Thread starter):
Do you think these approaches will become wider spread? From what I understand you need extra equipment and training but if it lowers minimums and increases safety I guess it is worth the investment.

In my view they will, with WAAS they will end up replacing the ILS in my view, MLS implementation was put to the halt with the same view. Each ILS costs about 1 million dollars a year to maintain.

For a non precision approach, they can provide detailed straight in approaches, and miss procedures.



We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
User currently onlinePihero From France, joined Jan 2005, 4624 posts, RR: 77
Reply 2, posted (8 years 6 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 3908 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Just about everybody is now experimentying with GNSS -Global navigation satellite system - approaches.(That's the offgicial name for it)
Here, it is a very cautious process as the presentation on the flight instruments could lull pilots into an excessive sense of safety (There is a centerline and a glide slope .
There are a few test approaches at CDG, flown by volunterr and approved aircrews.The minima are comparable to the VOR-DME let-downs and the preparation is heeeeeaaaaavvvvvyyyy! As a matter of fact and in future SOPs, it would just be a matter of checking the satellites available and the required performance (.1 Nm at the moment).
Once more I agree with Zeke that it will end up replacing the ILS, but not too soon for cat III minima (In my opinion, we'll need the differential GPS and Gallileo for that).
This seems to be the answer to third world countries airport investment, too.
(After all, it's the simplest task to draw a straight-in approach path into any airfield, even a football pitch or ,as already been tried a helicopter pad.).



Contrail designer
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic GPS/RNP Approaches
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
NDB/VOR Vs GPS Approaches posted Wed May 17 2006 00:23:10 by Julianuk
Questions: DME/DME, DME/DME/IRU, RNP, And GPS posted Sat May 6 2006 23:25:11 by FlyMeARiver
RNP(RNAV) Approaches posted Sat Jan 14 2006 16:47:42 by KJFK31L
GPS Used As DME On Approaches posted Sat Jun 19 2004 02:22:04 by Flyf15
GPS Approaches posted Thu Mar 27 2003 18:44:29 by Racers22
Circle To Land And GPS Approaches posted Thu Mar 15 2001 00:24:53 by H. Simpson
GPS Vs Other IFR Approaches posted Sat Sep 30 2000 16:45:38 by AA737-800
JetBlue And RNAV/VOR Approaches posted Mon Oct 16 2006 19:00:18 by IAHFLYR
Portable GPS Questions posted Mon Sep 4 2006 00:12:05 by Dw747400
ILS Approaches In Large Jets posted Thu May 25 2006 02:14:34 by RamerinianAir

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format