Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
ILS Approaches In Large Jets  
User currently offlineRamerinianAir From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 1486 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 4258 times:

In IMC, (Instrument Conditions) how far off are the aircraft when they have the runway in sight? Are the pilots flying the approach? When the runway comes in sight, how close are you always within centerline.
Thanks,
SR


W N = my Worst Nightmare!!!!!
8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlinePilot3033 From United States of America, joined May 2006, 111 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4124 times:

In large commercail aircraft (767, A330 etc.) the autoland system (which is what I assume you are reffering to) is generally pretty accurate. I've seen autland landing right on the centerline right in the TDZ. Approach "minimums" (the point at which the pilot must see the runway lights) are done based on each airport and/or company SOPs.
Not sure sure about that last part. Someone else may be able to provide more specific information.
As far as consistancy, it would depened on the weather, and if the autoland was working properly.
-Matt



-Matt
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 2, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 20 hours ago) and read 4038 times:

Quoting RamerinianAir (Thread starter):
When the runway comes in sight, how close are you always within centerline.

All equipment on the ground and aircraft working properly, satellites in the future for CAT II/III weather conditions, the runway centerline better be right under the nose gear of the aircraft since an ILS you are flying the localizer course which is the centerline of the runway.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 3, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 3969 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 2):
better be right under the nose gear

Actually the ILS antenna will be on centerline. The nose gear may be left or right, depending on crosswind, so as to cause the antenna to track the centerline. This is part of the reason why there are crosswind limits for categories of ILS approaches and for autoland.

Quoting RamerinianAir (Thread starter):
how far off are the aircraft when they have the runway in sight?

Taking an old Cat I ILS with mins of 200 feet as an example, a 747 might be at 200 feet, radar altitude but if you can picture the plane in the approach attitude at this point, the main landing gear will be dangling somewhere below this height (especially as viewed up a three degree glideslope from the intended touchdown point) and the cockpit might be fifty feet or more above that line - still in the clouds even.

This was one reason for the 3-bar VASI. "Long-body" airplanes have a pilot eyeball location well above the glidepath centerline.

Going to Cat II and Cat III (plus) approaches the 'cone' gets smaller closer in. That is, one-half dot of deviation is quite a bit more lateral distance out at the final approach fix than it is just before touchdown. ("ever smaller corrections until you arrive at the right gate")

At toucdown on a Cat III ILS the pilots are not going to be able to see very much of the world, but one thing they will see is a very short bit of runway centerline lighting/marking directly ahead of them - in the direction they are traveling, if not the direction they are pointing. (Allowing for crabbing here due to crosswind)

One of the hardest things to break a trainee pilot of is the tendency to try to point the plane toward the runway when they break out of the clouds. What is important here is that if the runway is slightly off to the left or right it is because the plane has been holding a crab while tracking down the localizer with a crosswind. If you aim it toward the runway you will take out that drift correction and the next thing you know you are drifting out over the grass, then you are steering back past the centerline - then you are goiing missed approach because you are no longer in position to land. At least ON the runway! Smile



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 4, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 14 hours ago) and read 3953 times:

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 3):
Actually the ILS antenna will be on centerline. The nose gear may be left or right, depending on crosswind, so as to cause the antenna to track the centerline. This is part of the reason why there are crosswind limits for categories of ILS approaches and for autoland.

Okay, a minor error on my part!!

But the nose gear shouldn't be too far away.  crossfingers 



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 5, posted (8 years 2 months 1 week 7 hours ago) and read 3870 times:

Quoting IAHFLYR (Reply 4):
But the nose gear shouldn't be too far away.

Yeah, viewed up a three degree glideslope and with the plane in an approach attitude which would be another few degrees nose up, it might be fifteen, twenty feet or so on a really large airplane.

Laterally, it should be pretty close to centerline even with some crosswind correction.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineBoeing7E7 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 6, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3799 times:

It depends on the glideslope for the runway. Standard CAT I is a 200' decision height with a decent rate of 318' per nautical mile (3 degree glideslope) with a threshold crossing height of 50' to 55' depending on the airport design aircraft. In a nut shell, at the DH your just outside the approach lights +/- 3,800' or so from the threshold.

User currently offlineRendezvous From New Zealand, joined May 2001, 515 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (8 years 2 months 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3712 times:

I've done a couple of ILS approaches pretty close to minimums in a Piper Seneca, hand flown. If the needles are centred you come out in line with the runway. It wouldn't be a precision approach if you didn't!

I beleive the ILS is calibrated from time to time to check it's pointing in the right place.


User currently offlineJetlagged From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 2543 posts, RR: 24
Reply 8, posted (8 years 2 months 5 days 10 hours ago) and read 3574 times:

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 3):
Taking an old Cat I ILS with mins of 200 feet as an example, a 747 might be at 200 feet, radar altitude but if you can picture the plane in the approach attitude at this point, the main landing gear will be dangling somewhere below this height (especially as viewed up a three degree glideslope from the intended touchdown point) and the cockpit might be fifty feet or more above that line - still in the clouds even.

Radar altitude is calibrated to read main gear height above ground on the approach. So at 200 feet RA, the main gear will be 200 feet above ground. On a typical 3 degree glideslope at Vref the 747 pilot's eyepoint is about 40 feet higher than this (i.e. 240 feet AGL).

If this wasn't the case, the GPWS rad alt callouts would never reach zero before the main gear touched. Rad alt should be zero at touchdown, and it might even go negative as the aircraft de-rotates, depending where the rad alt aerial is located.



The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic ILS Approaches In Large Jets
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Travel Times For Short Flights In Private Jets. posted Wed Apr 19 2006 01:23:20 by Lenbrazil
CAT III ILS Approaches posted Sun Jun 13 2004 01:46:48 by Cba
Big Headsets In Passenger Jets? posted Tue Jan 13 2004 14:19:02 by Kay
ILS Approaches posted Sun Jan 4 2004 08:17:40 by BrodieBrazil
Airplane Approaches In Varible Winds posted Thu Dec 25 2003 19:58:22 by Flairport
Offset LDA ILS Approaches posted Sun Sep 15 2002 05:06:48 by FrequentFlyKid
Different Glide Slopes On ILS Approaches posted Sat Jan 19 2002 10:17:00 by DBOBA
Luggage Storage In Regional Jets? posted Mon Nov 26 2001 20:38:16 by Ikarus
Sudden Interest In SST And RAM Jets posted Fri Jun 23 2006 04:44:41 by Bhill
Another Step In ILS? Is This Possible? posted Sat Sep 17 2005 14:12:45 by Aerlingus330

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format