Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Lettering On Wings: Why Not Done Anymore?  
User currently offlineAirwave From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1117 posts, RR: 3
Posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4727 times:

I was looking at photographs of airports from the 1950s and 1960s and many of the commercial aircraft pictured have their registration number on one wing and the name of the carrier on the other. Both the top and the bottom portions of the wing would have the info.

Today, this is no longer done, so my question is why not? I know it seems a rather trivial detail, but if it was such a major compontent of aviation then, when did it fall out of practice and why?

Thanks for any information, y'all.


Airwave  eyebrow 


When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
20 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4728 times:

Quoting Airwave (Thread starter):
Today, this is no longer done, so my question is why not?

For british aircraft, it is a legal requirement to have the Registration of the aircraft on the underside of the wings...



Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offline411A From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1826 posts, RR: 8
Reply 2, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4710 times:

Because it is no longer required by the FAA for US registered aircraft

User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 21 hours ago) and read 4710 times:

Quoting Airwave (Thread starter):
registration number on one wing

The registration number was on both wings, top of right and bottom of left. Why did they change? That I don't know. I tried googling "right wing", "left wing" and "registration number" and all I got was a lot of junk about conspiracy theories. This is a case where Google is not your friend.  Smile


User currently offlineFlyMatt2Bermud From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 563 posts, RR: 7
Reply 4, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4694 times:

We operate a Bermuda registered aircraft which is subject to safety oversight surveillance by the Civil Aviation Authority of the United Kingdom who ensures compliance with international aviation safety standards of the Air Navigation (Overseas Territories) Order. It is a requirement that we display our registration number beneath the left wing of the aircraft as shown here.
Big version: Width: 640 Height: 495 File size: 75kb



"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward" Leonardo Da Vinci
User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 20 hours ago) and read 4676 times:

In Canada, provided the registration on the fuselage is of a certain size, it is not required to paint it on the wings. My employers decided to go this route to save time and money.

User currently offlineAirwave From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 1117 posts, RR: 3
Reply 6, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4663 times:

Quoting Kaddyuk (Reply 1):



Quoting FlyMatt2Bermud (Reply 4):



Quoting Avt007 (Reply 5):

Thanks for the info, the three of you!  bigthumbsup 

Quoting 411A (Reply 2):
Because it is no longer required by the FAA for US registered aircraft

...Okay...But *why* is it no longer required? *That's* the real question here. I mean, if other parts of the world still have this policy, what made the US differentiate?

Quoting Bobster2 (Reply 3):
I tried googling "right wing", "left wing" and "registration number" and all I got was a lot of junk about conspiracy theories. This is a case where Google is not your friend.

LOL!


Airwave  eyebrow 



When you do things right, people won't be sure you've done anything at all.
User currently offlineFlyMatt2Bermud From United States of America, joined Jan 2006, 563 posts, RR: 7
Reply 7, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 19 hours ago) and read 4661 times:

Quoting Airwave (Reply 6):
Okay...But *why* is it no longer required?

Good question. I hope someone has an idea, I refuse to guess.



"When once you have tasted flight, you will forever walk the earth with your eyes turned skyward" Leonardo Da Vinci
User currently offline411A From United States of America, joined Nov 2001, 1826 posts, RR: 8
Reply 8, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4643 times:

The US requirement for the registration number on the underside of one wing was dropped 'round about 1955 or so (before the FAA came into existance), and IIRC was filed as an exception to ICAO later on.

User currently offlineN8076U From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 425 posts, RR: 9
Reply 9, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4637 times:

Here's a different twist on this topic: UA used to have some ex-Qantas 747-238s. Qantas had their registration letters on the bottom of the left wing, per the regs. UA painted the aircraft, including the wings when they got them. After several years, at least one of these aircraft had the paint fade and peel so badly under their left wing, that you could see the old registration. They continued to fly with this foreign registration clearly visible until retirement.  Wink

Chris



Don't blame me, I don't work here...
User currently offlineBOE773 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 10, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 18 hours ago) and read 4629 times:

The Canadian requirement for underwing lettering was dropped in the early 90s.
I discovered that when I had my own aircraft painted.


User currently offlinePtrjong From Netherlands, joined Mar 2005, 3901 posts, RR: 19
Reply 11, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 17 hours ago) and read 4616 times:

Quoting Airwave (Reply 6):
But *why* is it no longer required?

To answer this, it might help to know why it was ever required in the first place. Probably to aid identification of crashed aircraft from the air, or of aircraft that are being checked out by fighters or some reason. With better communications, visual identification became less important I suppose.

Peter 

PS It hasn't completely disappeared yet. I flew on this Indonesian airliner and it has its registration in big red lettering on top of the starboard wing.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Jong



[Edited 2006-07-14 08:28:54]


The only difference between me and a madman is that I am not mad (Salvador Dali)
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31660 posts, RR: 56
Reply 12, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 16 hours ago) and read 4595 times:

Out here Nationality & Registration marks with proper dimensions on wing & Fuselage are Mandatory.
regs
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineNWOrientDC10 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1404 posts, RR: 4
Reply 13, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 14 hours ago) and read 4573 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

BEA did with it's Siddeley Hawker Tridents.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Clive Dyball



This a/c type is the only type I've seen with "painted" wings


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Steve Williams
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Alastair T. Gardiner - WorldAirImages



On a related note, TWA had a black stripe on its wings. I think it was to detect inflight icing or something.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Dariusz Jezewski "FotoDJ Photography"
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Tommy Simms



Good Day  Smile

Russell



Things aren't always as they seem
User currently offlineYYZYYT From Canada, joined Apr 2005, 943 posts, RR: 0
Reply 14, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 7 hours ago) and read 4478 times:

Alitalia still does...


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Massimo Pesenti SpotIT



is it because Italy still requires it?


User currently offlineBobster2 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 15, posted (7 years 12 months 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 4414 times:

I'm going to take a wild guess.  Smile Don't shoot me if I'm wrong.

Back in the early days the painted numbers were there so people on the ground could identify planes flying overhead, especially if they were doing something illegal. If you spotted somebody flying in a dangerous manner you could report them. In the early days there was little need for air to air identification because the number of planes was small and a pilot was not likely to see other planes. Airports were small with few planes; if you needed to identify a plane parked on the ground you could walk up to it and look under the wing.

At some point airlines starting growing and airports began to have a lot of planes on the ground. At that point it was necessary for ground personnel, air traffic controllers, and others to identify many planes from a distance and having numbers on the tail or side of the fuselage became mandatory, because numbers on the wings are not visible enough to airport workers. Numbers on the side are still visible from above and below, so that function was not lost. All they did was improve visibility to the side.

It may be as simple as that. In the beginning bottom only was all they needed and nobody imagined airports with hundreds of airliners. When they needed more, they changed it. Just a wild and crazy guess.  Smile


User currently offlineCitationJet From United States of America, joined Mar 2003, 2413 posts, RR: 3
Reply 16, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 4312 times:

Quoting NWOrientDC10 (Reply 13):
This a/c type is the only type I've seen with "painted" wings

Do you mean the aircraft types that you have seen, or that you know of?

Lots of aircraft have painted wings:
Blue:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Joe Pries - ATR Team


Red:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ben Pritchard


Green:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Gilberto Simon


Yellow:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Peter de Groot


Multi-color:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © J Mena


Cartoon:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Frank Zahorik


White:
View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © French Frogs AirSlides


Plus all Lufthansa aircraft wings are painted white.



Boeing Flown: 701,702,703;717;720;721,722;731,732,733,734,735,737,738,739;741,742,743,744,747SP;752,753;762,763;772,773.
User currently offlineFlyabunch From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 517 posts, RR: 4
Reply 17, posted (7 years 12 months 1 day ago) and read 4282 times:

All of the JAL jets still have the wing numbers. I have seen them many times at LAX. Also if you look in the photos on A-net they are quite often in view.

Mike


User currently offlineNWOrientDC10 From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1404 posts, RR: 4
Reply 18, posted (7 years 12 months 23 hours ago) and read 4274 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting CitationJet (Reply 16):
Do you mean the aircraft types that you have seen, or that you know of?

Both. Thx for the info and pics. I learned something today.  Smile

Good Day  Smile

Russell



Things aren't always as they seem
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31660 posts, RR: 56
Reply 19, posted (7 years 12 months 14 hours ago) and read 4213 times:

How Effective are those Paint Schemes after say a Hydraulic Leak  Smile
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineOly720man From United Kingdom, joined May 2004, 6666 posts, RR: 11
Reply 20, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 4116 times:

This was discussed here....

http://www.airliners.net/discussions/tech_ops/read.main/153745

And I found this

http://www.airweb.faa.gov/Regulatory...85ed86256d9f006c1038/$FILE/1-6.pdf

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
FEDERAL AVIATION AGENCY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Civil Air Regulations Amendment 1-6
Effective: July 25, 1963
Issued: July 18, 1963
[Reg. Docket No. 1864; Amdt. 1-6; Supp. 1]
PART 1-CERTIFICATION, IDENTIFICATION, AND MARKING OF AIRCRAFT AND RELATED PRODUCTS
Exceptions To Marking Requirements

which partway down says........


Currently effective §§ 1.102(a) and 1.103(a), which became effective on December 31, 1960, prescribe 12-inch identification marks, to be located either on the side of the fuselage, or on the vertical tail surfaces, for fixed-wing aircraft. Compliance with this provision introduces the anachronism that operators of antique aircraft find objectionable. In general, they wish to display, instead, the formerly prescribed 20-inch wing marks and 2-inch side fuselage or vertical tail surface marks.


The Agency adopted the 12-inch side identification marks as standard for fixed-wing aircraft as a means of decreasing the collision hazard associated with air-to-air identification of civil aircraft by U.S. Air Force interceptor aircraft engaged in national defense. In addition, the Agency’s air traffic controllers had advised that such marks aided in the control of air traffic by facilitating the identification of aircraft.


More recently the Agency has been informed by the U.S. Air Force North American Air Defense Command that it would have no objection to the deletion of the requirement for side fuselage or tail markings on antique aircraft which are operated at less than 180 knots TAS within the continental limits of the United States, except for the Florida area, but that it would object to granting similar relief, under similar conditions, for all nonantique aircraft. Relevant also is a new rule, recently adopted by the Agency as part of Amendment 60-24 effective December 26, 1961, which requires that aircraft operated to, from, or on an airport at which an airport traffic control tower is operated by the United States Government be capable of two-way radio communication with that control tower. With two-way communication available, control tower personnel now have little need to visually identify aircraft by means of its identification marks.


==========================================



wheat and dairy can screw up your brain
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Lettering On Wings: Why Not Done Anymore?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Paint In The Wings...why Not? posted Mon Feb 14 2005 17:36:41 by Bongo
Winglets On DC10: Why Not? posted Mon Jan 24 2005 07:53:12 by Bruce
Why Not Engines On Top Of The Wings? posted Wed Jun 1 2005 00:21:25 by Keta
Why Not More (quick) Stops On Longer Flights? posted Sun Jul 16 2006 15:38:25 by Pavlin
Why No US. Reg Numbers On Wings? posted Fri Apr 28 2006 16:45:00 by Access-Air
Why Not Accelerate Wheels On Landing? posted Mon Sep 12 2005 15:35:41 by TaromA380
Why Not Winglets On Every Airplane? posted Thu Jun 2 2005 18:24:04 by KCMike
Why Not Use Goo Tyres On Aircraft posted Tue Feb 1 2005 10:59:27 by Allpress
Why No Paint On Wings? posted Wed May 5 2004 12:55:05 by A380900
Why Not Visuals Recorded On CVR posted Wed Jul 9 2003 13:01:08 by HAWK21M

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format