Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Step Climbs And Vertical Separation Over Pacific  
User currently offlineTroyshouse From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (9 years 10 months 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3089 times:

I recently returned to Australia on UAL 839, LAX-SSY on a 744. We started out cruising at FL290 and I noticed that as we progressed, the step climbs were in 500 foot increments (FL295, FL300, etc.) resulting in a final cruise altitude of FL370 at the top of descent point into Sydney. Are the track rules over the Pacific different than the Atlantic or have the vertical separation rules over remote areas changed?

1 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlinePihero From France, joined Jan 2005, 5174 posts, RR: 78
Reply 1, posted (9 years 10 months 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3066 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

What you are describing is not a step climb but the simplification of an ascending cruise.
In order to optimize his flight, a pilot can elect,when flying outside designated ATS routes over oceanic regions to adhere the closest to the optimim altitude his/her aircraft is capable.
With a modern FMS which constantly computes the optimum altitude, depending on the cost index or the regome to fly (long range for instance...), the exercise is rather easy and fun : on a 744, youd climb 100 ft every 5 or 6 minutes.
Of coiurse that flight has to be protected from other traffic, therefore some sort of lateral protection is awarded (We do it as a routine between LAX and PPT), and a specific flight ploan has to be filed .
ATC services would in this case require
1/- the way point at which the ascending cruise would begin,
2/- the cruising mach number and
3/- the blocked slice of altitudes to be reserved for the flight.
On a flight plan, it would show thus :C/25N125W/M085F300F380, meaning that we intend an ascending cruise (denoted by the C/ ) from the point 25 North 125 West with a cruising Mach of .85 and we'd like to block the airspace between levels 300 and 380.
Sometimes when the winds aloft are favorable, the final level is not mentioned and the last part of the FPL would then be :...F300PLUS, but I saw that example only once in my career.

Contrail designer
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Step Climbs And Vertical Separation Over Pacific
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
A340-500 Frames And Wing Difference Over A343? posted Sun Jan 29 2006 02:28:13 by SWISSER
UK CAA And 380 Separation Requirements posted Mon Jan 16 2006 17:37:29 by PhilSquares
RVSM-new Vertical Separation- How's It Going? posted Mon Jan 24 2005 20:42:02 by Tjwgrr
Extra Fuel In Horizontal And Vertical Stabilizers posted Sat Sep 28 2002 14:56:00 by Godbless
Heights Of Thunderstorms And Flying Over Them posted Sun Apr 30 2006 21:14:04 by JulianUK
FLs Over CIS, Russia And China posted Tue Dec 17 2002 02:40:07 by Andrej
Etops Over The Pacific? posted Tue Apr 24 2001 18:35:26 by CloudNine
MD-80 And AS 261 posted Thu Nov 23 2006 03:13:59 by MissedApproach
Mach 1, Temperature, And Pressure posted Mon Nov 13 2006 08:54:05 by Speedracer1407
Current Pacific Etops Alternates? posted Wed Nov 8 2006 02:33:13 by Timz

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format