Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Derated To  
User currently offlineDiego From Italy, joined Apr 2001, 135 posts, RR: 0
Posted (15 years 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1203 times:

Hi folks
Can anybody tell me why in the Derated Take off procedure you have to assume a higher temperature?
Regards Diego

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineJETPILOT From United States of America, joined May 1999, 3130 posts, RR: 27
Reply 1, posted (15 years 2 weeks 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 1186 times:

I think your talking about the assumed temperature of 49C for reduced power setings?

Your assuming a higher temperature in order to reduce the power output of the engine.

You only used the assumed temp as long as the runway or second segment climb limit don't dictate a higher power setting, or the max reducable numbers aren't exceeded.

If the runway limited weight is less than the assumed temp limit you must use the temp for the runway limited weight.

Same story with second segment limits as previously stated.

Why 49C is used I can't answer that. I don't know how the yarrived at that temp.

I don't know if my ramblings helped any.


User currently offlineF-WWAI From Andorra, joined Dec 1999, 131 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (15 years 2 weeks 6 days 8 hours ago) and read 1172 times:

that's relatively simple.
imagine that your max take off thrust available depends on outside air temperature. it's flat rated (=constant) until a certain temp (e.g. ISA +15C) then decreases linearily with temperature to maintain constant turbine entry temperature.
given this, you may understand that you can take off a certain aircraft gross weight until a certain OAT. got it?
imagine now you are at low OAT but you have a GW which permits take-off at ISA + 40C. then you can tell you thrust control to compute the take-off thrust at the assumed temperature of ISA+40C, and you will obtain the thrust required for the take-off.
clear enough?
 Smile/happy/getting dizzy FW

User currently offlineJG From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 0 posts, RR: 1
Reply 3, posted (15 years 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 1167 times:

Additionally, derated thrust and assumed thrust are two different beasts. The CFM powered 737's I used to fly could do both derate and assumed (also called balanced thrust) individually or combined. The 320 series I fly now simply uses assumed temperature. On our 320's that assumed temperature can be as high as ISA + 53C

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Derated To
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Where To Find Apron/gate Charts USA posted Fri Jan 26 2007 02:56:46 by A340600MAN
How Long And How Much Does It Take To Paint A Plan posted Thu Jan 25 2007 06:12:38 by FL370
Wing Goes Big,Upgrading From A-320 To A-340 posted Wed Jan 17 2007 18:46:30 by Wing
Is 787 To Have Centre Gear? posted Mon Jan 15 2007 23:18:44 by Ruscoe
707 Section 41 Compaired To A 727& 737? posted Fri Jan 12 2007 00:47:06 by 747400sp
Tech Stops And Where To Stop. posted Wed Jan 10 2007 16:02:37 by Oly720man
US FAA To End Etops Restrictions posted Wed Jan 10 2007 00:22:21 by DEVILFISH
When Is CFM Going To Work On A New Engine? posted Wed Jan 3 2007 23:53:33 by 747400sp
747 Takeoff Video: Zero To Rotate In 20 Seconds? posted Mon Jan 1 2007 09:58:25 by Jawed
Have I Helped To Save The Planet? posted Sun Dec 31 2006 09:30:44 by Goinv

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format