Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
High Winged Aircraft  
User currently offlineCaptaink From Mexico, joined May 2001, 5109 posts, RR: 12
Posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 19 hours ago) and read 2377 times:

What is the reason for some manufacturers mounting the horizontal stabilizer at the top of the tail?

Dash 8s, ATRs etc all have high mounted wings and high mounted H. Stabilizers, so I would think it has something to do with that. But then airplanes like the C130 also has high mounted wings, but low mounted H. Stabilizers.

So what is the reason? Purely asthetics? Or is there a technical reason.


There is something special about planes....
13 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently onlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17173 posts, RR: 66
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2352 times:

Quoting Captaink (Thread starter):

So what is the reason? Purely asthetics? Or is there a technical reason.

Yes. They mount them there to make the aircraft look cool  Wink

As far as I know, there are two reasons for moving the stab: engine positioning and shadowing. You don't want to be in a situation where the wing perturbs airflow over the stab and renders it ineffective.

Presumably there is a difference in the airflows between a Dash 8 and a Hercules. Perhaps the Hercules low stab is not in a position shadowed by the wing as the ATR would be.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2347 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 1):
As far as I know, there are two reasons for moving the stab: engine positioning and shadowing. You don't want to be in a situation where the wing perturbs airflow over the stab and renders it ineffective.

3rd reason, you don't want a ramp rat driving into it. Up there you are pretty much out of the way.

Herk doesn't have the aft side cargo door the Dash 8 or the B1900 have.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offlineMir From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 21864 posts, RR: 55
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2343 times:

Quoting L-188 (Reply 2):
3rd reason, you don't want a ramp rat driving into it. Up there you are pretty much out of the way.

Hmm, good point. Offhand I can't think of any common regional airliners that don't have a T-tail, apart from the Saab 340 and 2000.

-Mir



7 billion, one nation, imagination...it's a beautiful day
User currently onlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17173 posts, RR: 66
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2341 times:

Quoting Mir (Reply 3):
Quoting L-188 (Reply 2):
3rd reason, you don't want a ramp rat driving into it. Up there you are pretty much out of the way.

Hmm, good point. Offhand I can't think of any common regional airliners that don't have a T-tail, apart from the Saab 340 and 2000.

I'm gonna guess that the SAAB 340 and 2000 don't have a cargo door in a delicate position. But then again, doesn't the ATR have a front cargo hold?



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineL-188 From United States of America, joined Jul 1999, 29832 posts, RR: 58
Reply 5, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2337 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 4):
I'm gonna guess that the SAAB 340 and 2000 don't have a cargo door in a delicate position. But then again, doesn't the ATR have a front cargo hold

Yeah the Saabs do have the low tail and aft cargo bay, the Metro has that mid tail and the aft door.

Compared to the aerodynamics of the aircraft, arranging things to prevend ground rash is a lesser consideration, but thinking about it can prevent a lot of problems for the operators. I pointed this out to the guys you where building the Kodiak when they had it on display at last years aviation trad show in Anchorage, which is a single engined turboprop, akin to the Caravan.

They have an aft door sized to take a full sized pallet, but they hinged the door so it only xtends out to a little higher then level to the ground...an invitation for somebody to put a forklift tower in it. I told the sales reps at the show that also.



OBAMA-WORST PRESIDENT EVER....Even SKOORB would be better.
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8956 posts, RR: 60
Reply 6, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2331 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
DATABASE EDITOR



Whenever possible, engineers place engines, control surfaces, and internal components as inconveniently as possible to complicate the lives of maintenance personnel.  Wink




2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineAC320tech From Canada, joined Jul 2006, 197 posts, RR: 1
Reply 7, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2299 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 4):

I'm gonna guess that the SAAB 340 and 2000 don't have a cargo door in a delicate position. But then again, doesn't the ATR have a front cargo hold?

Front and a rear bulk hold.


User currently offline57AZ From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2556 posts, RR: 2
Reply 8, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 2195 times:

Reason for the high wing is pretty much dictated by the intended use. You need a powerplant setup with sufficient prop clearance but everything has to be designed so that the aircraft does not require ground support at outlying stations. Therefore the cabin and hold floors must naturally be as low to the ground as possible. Ideally the hold should be low enough for someone to comfortably jump to the ground from and climb into with a small ladder. Probaby just easier to use a high wing design. Only low wing commuter types I can think of are the Saabs, the EMB 110-120, Beech 1900 series and the HS748. I believe (but am not certain) that the ATR deck sill is lower than these previously mentioned aircraft.

[Edited 2006-08-07 08:53:36]


"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."
User currently offlineZkpilot From New Zealand, joined Mar 2006, 4865 posts, RR: 10
Reply 9, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 4 hours ago) and read 2168 times:

Quoting Captaink (Thread starter):
But then airplanes like the C130 also has high mounted wings, but low mounted H. Stabilizers.

The herc's tail is quite highly mounted (giving room for the rear ramp) so in effect the low horz stab is effectively in a position that would be mid height on other a/c.



56 types. 38 countries. 24 airlines.
User currently offlineBoeingOnFinal From Norway, joined Apr 2006, 476 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 3 hours ago) and read 2163 times:

Fokker 50 har high wing, low horizontal stabilizer.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Anders Presterud



How does that work? It doesn't look like they are lined up exactly. But when it's rotating the horizontal stabilizer has to be affected by the air flow from the wings, no?



norwegianpilot.blogspot.com
User currently onlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17173 posts, RR: 66
Reply 11, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2151 times:

Quoting BoeingOnFinal (Reply 10):


How does that work? It doesn't look like they are lined up exactly. But when it's rotating the horizontal stabilizer has to be affected by the air flow from the wings, no?

Sure it is affected. But the important thing is that the stab still has authority. Obviously that seems to be the case, or the F50 would fall out of the sky regularly.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineMechEngineer From Germany, joined Jun 2006, 46 posts, RR: 0
Reply 12, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 2105 times:

Quote:
Reason for the high wing is pretty much dictated by the intended use.

But nobody uses a T-tail if it can be avoided, because it adds weight compared to a conventional layout, or so I was told by the Do328 structure guys.



Heavier-than-air flying machines...
User currently offlineN231YE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 13, posted (8 years 4 months 2 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2031 times:

I've heard that the "T" tail was more responsive, (why STOL aircraft use it more often) but could run into deep stalls on earlier aircraft, such as the British Aerospace 111.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic High Winged Aircraft
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
High Mileage Aircraft posted Sat Oct 8 2005 09:38:22 by Bruce
Low Vs High Wing Aircraft posted Sat Jul 6 2002 07:53:47 by Trent_800
High Air Temp Affecting Aircraft Performance? posted Wed Aug 2 2006 11:36:00 by Singel09
High/Low Wing Aircraft Advantages/disadvantages posted Mon Mar 27 2006 22:46:21 by Hcpunx99
Wind Data From Commerical Aircraft At High Levels posted Sun Dec 11 2005 22:52:31 by Julesmusician
High Wing Vs. Low Wing Aircraft posted Thu Dec 4 2003 23:19:26 by RockyRacoon
Why Do Aircraft Fly High? posted Fri Aug 17 2001 15:02:20 by Aerokid
Stored/Parked Aircraft With Flaps Extended? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 04:59:56 by Warreng24
Do Aircraft Controls Have To Be "calibrated"? posted Sun Nov 12 2006 21:26:09 by Jamesbuk
Tell Me About Aircraft Batteries.. posted Sun Nov 12 2006 06:04:24 by N234NW

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format