Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Doesn't ATL Use Immediate Departures?  
User currently offlineSESGDL From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3474 posts, RR: 10
Posted (8 years 9 hours ago) and read 2719 times:

I've flown out of ATL three times in the past year, most recently this past Tuesday, and was wondering why immediate departures weren't being used on any of the occasions. Most recently, we left about 45 minutes late from the gate on my flight from ATL-MSP due to a malfunctioning lavatory, but sat in a line of about 25-30 planes on runway 26L, which took roughly 50 minutes. I was frustrated to see that planes would taxi into position and hold and then sit for 2-3 minutes before finally revving up and departing. My plane of course rolled onto the runway and immediately took off.  Yeah sure The weather was clear and with parallel runways I would've thought that ATL could have had immediate departures, or at least not have aircraft sit on the runway for as long as they did. Does anyone know why they don't?

Jeremy

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9946 posts, RR: 26
Reply 1, posted (8 years 9 hours ago) and read 2710 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting SESGDL (Thread starter):
Does anyone know why they don't?

I don't know if this is the reason, but I believe departures have to be spaced by a certain distance (or time, I forget) due to wake turbulence from the previously departed aircraft.

~Vik



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineOnetogo From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 314 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2640 times:

Perhaps a combination of wake turbulence seperate (3 mins behind a heavy) and departure spacing and sequencing restrictions placed on the tower by the TRACON and/or the center.

User currently offlineIAHFLYR From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 3, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 2632 times:

Wake turb separation is applied using miles rather than minutes at most airports. So, that in itself if a large number of B752/3's or widebodies can account for some of the added delay in departures. Another reason may be due to an enroute restriction out a departure route or routes from ATL Center or a second tier center such as JAX etc.

Weather can be totally wonderful and restrictions get put in place simply due to volume or weather 200 miles down the road. If you get caught up in that line and no way out of it guess what, you're gonna site an wait till your number rolls up.

Yet another possible reason for the delay on some departures might have been for the RNAV departures that are creating an issue if the crew has not loaded the correct runway into the FMC or the waypoints aren't verified. The tower might be staggering the departures slightly so they don't have any more of the crossovers that have occurred off the end of the runway as the first waypoint on the SID is the active waypoint and the south runway departure makes a turn to the north runway waypoint and vice versa which has been taking place too many times....all ya need is to add some smoke and you've got the total airshow!  Smile Simply too many reasons for departures to not be rolling one after the other.



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineXjramper From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 2460 posts, RR: 51
Reply 4, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2593 times:

How was the weather? When in IMC conditions, when there is a plane landing on one runway they don't depart another aircraft, just in case they have to do a go around. Gives the pilots and ATC a little more breathing room.

XJR



Look ma' no hands!
User currently offlineSESGDL From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 3474 posts, RR: 10
Reply 5, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 20 hours ago) and read 2582 times:

Thanks for the responses. Answers my question perfectly!

Jeremy


User currently offlineTWAL1011727 From United States of America, joined Mar 2006, 626 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2473 times:

At ATL - Try being in an RJ or MD88 taking off behind 25 int'l B777/B767s.
and the ever wake turbulent B757. I was in an MD88 landing behind a B767 and went through their wake..rolled us 40 degrees and bounced us around for all of about 1 second then smoothed out. Quite fun....

KD


User currently offlineIahflyr From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 7, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 1 hour ago) and read 2463 times:

Quoting TWAL1011727 (Reply 6):
At ATL - Try being in an RJ or MD88 taking off behind 25 int'l B777/B767s.
and the ever wake turbulent B757. I was in an MD88 landing behind a B767 and went through their wake..

At any airport.....thus wake turbulence separation standards. A non wake turbulence separation required airplane is the B738 and B739's.....wonder if those are being looked at in some dark room for added separation?



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlineVikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 9946 posts, RR: 26
Reply 8, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 23 hours ago) and read 2446 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Iahflyr (Reply 7):
A non wake turbulence separation required airplane is the B738 and B739's

Meaning there's no separation requirement for takeoff behind a 738 or 739?

~Vik



"Two and a Half Men" was filmed in front of a live ostrich.
User currently offlineLearpilot From United States of America, joined May 2001, 814 posts, RR: 1
Reply 9, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 20 hours ago) and read 2409 times:

Also, in ATL they land on the outer runways and depart from the inner runways. They have to give the guys who landed a chance to cross the departure runway so they can taxi to the gate. A lot of the time you'll be sitting in position on the departure runway and see 5 aircraft that have landed cross in front of you.


Heed our warnings or your future will be underpant free!
User currently offlineIahflyr From United States of America, joined Jun 2005, 4790 posts, RR: 22
Reply 10, posted (7 years 12 months 3 days 16 hours ago) and read 2366 times:

Quoting Vikkyvik (Reply 8):
Meaning there's no separation requirement for takeoff behind a 738 or 739?

Exactly...unless a small taking off from an intersection, nor is there any for arrivals again unless a small is following on an approach and is not on a visual following the Boeing jet. So put a string of Boeings on final behind an 800 or 900 all that is needed is 3 miles or inside 10 from the runway if able to used reduced separation on final, you go down to 2.5 behind........departure rock and roll baby!



Any views shared are strictly my own and do not a represent those of any former employer.
User currently offlinePope From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 2075 times:

The rapid fire pace of ATL ATC has them issuing position and hold clearances before the aircraft rolling has even departed the runway - that way there's always someone ready to go as soon as ATC or spacing issues allow the plane to be released. Add the mix of various aircraft types from ATR's (and until relatively recently EMB120's) to 747's and everything in between and it's just impossible to "launch" everyone without a hold if for nothing else other than spacing.

But the notion that they always have you position and hold isn't the case. Late at night (I'm a FF on the last ATR flight from ATL to GNV) you usually get cleared directly for takeoff without even holding short of the runway.

But even at busy times controllers do some interesting things to keep the traffic moving efficiently whenever possible. It was a 1730 departure on an ATR72 and we were taxing from D concourse via Mike to 27R when all of a sudden we crossed 27R at Kilo then taxied via November to Juliet and took off from 27L. There must have been a break in the arrivals because we had to have been something like #15 for takeoff from 27R. I'm sure that move saved us at least 25 minutes.

A couple of weeks before that, we were headed for a 9L departure via Mike when we were cleared via Tango and November to 9R. Again it saved us a ton of time during rush hour.

KATL airport chart here: http://www.answers.com/topic/katl-diagram-png


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why Doesn't ATL Use Immediate Departures?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Position And Hold? Why Do We Use This? posted Thu Mar 2 2006 21:07:30 by Alias1024
Why Asian Pilots Use Gloves During Flight Ops? posted Thu Nov 28 2002 05:09:14 by Jgore
Why Use CRT Monitors? posted Tue Dec 6 2005 07:43:54 by Goinv
Why Not Use Goo Tyres On Aircraft posted Tue Feb 1 2005 10:59:27 by Allpress
Why Use Reverse Thrust On Long Runways posted Tue Jan 11 2005 10:15:14 by JumboJim747
Why B747-400D Doesn't Have Winglets posted Fri Nov 24 2000 21:24:51 by SAA-SAL
Why 2 Engines More Efficient Than 3, Or 4? posted Thu Nov 16 2006 03:13:12 by MarkC
Why Airbus For Start-ups? posted Mon Nov 13 2006 18:27:42 by AirWillie6475
Why No Further A330 Stretch? posted Fri Nov 10 2006 03:50:51 by MarkC
Why Does The Tower Give Out Altimetric Reading posted Fri Nov 10 2006 02:58:14 by YULspotter

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format