Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
The End Of The Lame?  
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14139 posts, RR: 63
Posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 23 hours ago) and read 3465 times:

I've read on www.airmech.co.uk that appparently there is a motion going on within the EASA and the European aviation industry to get rid of the Licenced Aircraft Maintenance Engineer.
The motion is apparently being based on the current shortage of licenced staff (due to the airline's failure of training new staff) and the therefore increasing salaries (supply and demand).
According to this thread http://www.airmech.co.uk/forums/showthread.php?t=5674, if the new legislation passes, in future maintenance organisations can declare a person "appropiately approved" to carry out maintenance on an aircraft and to sign for it without having undergone formal training.
So the management can declare and Tom, Dick or Harry tractor mechanic fit to do complex, safety relevant maintenance with this person having had to undergo an exam by the airworthiness authority. There will be only a few LAME's on the shift to sign off the CRS. All other tasks will be signed of by low paid, low trained "approved" staff.

Does anybody have more information?


Jan

[Edited 2006-09-09 22:40:36]

8 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineIlikeyyc From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1373 posts, RR: 20
Reply 1, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 21 hours ago) and read 3415 times:

First,

Quoting MD11Engineer (Thread starter):
safety relevant maintenance with this person having had to undergo an exam by the airworthiness authority.

Did you mean to say: safety relevant maintenance without this person having had to undergo an exam by the airworthiness authority.?

Second, this sounds like Repairman status here in the US.



Fighting Absurdity with Absurdity!
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14139 posts, RR: 63
Reply 2, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 20 hours ago) and read 3398 times:

Quoting Ilikeyyc (Reply 1):
Quoting MD11Engineer (Thread starter):
safety relevant maintenance with this person having had to undergo an exam by the airworthiness authority.

Did you mean to say: safety relevant maintenance without this person having had to undergo an exam by the airworthiness authority.?

Yes, this is what I mean, sorry about the typo. The person only gets an approval from his boss.

Jan


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 3, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 6 days 2 hours ago) and read 3273 times:

Quoting MD11Engineer (Thread starter):
There will be only a few LAME's on the shift to sign off the CRS. All other tasks will be signed of by low paid, low trained "approved" staff

Thats a bad trend if it starts...Whats the Justification.Just shortage of LAMEs.

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineTroubleshooter From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 423 posts, RR: 4
Reply 4, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 3214 times:

Before JAR/EASA we had the "good old" aircraft inspectors (Prüfer Klasse I, II, III, IV) with a national license and mechanics/engineers qualified in different level (A,B and C) under a company approval. Only the company determined in her quality handbook (MOE - ) the requirements for these different levels.

Looks like were stepping back again...



This job sucks!!! I love this job!!!
User currently offlineMD11Engineer From Germany, joined Oct 2003, 14139 posts, RR: 63
Reply 5, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 14 hours ago) and read 3057 times:

Quoting Troubleshooter (Reply 4):
Before JAR/EASA we had the "good old" aircraft inspectors (Prüfer Klasse I, II, III, IV) with a national license and mechanics/engineers qualified in different level (A,B and C) under a company approval. Only the company determined in her quality handbook (MOE - ) the requirements for these different levels.

Looks like were stepping back again...

... and if you were not an inspector with a government issued licence, if you changed your employer, you had to start right at the bottom again, since very few airlines would recognise another airline's qualifications.
I've seen very experienced mechanics, who could sign for a lit of tasks at one airline, loosing out big time when their old airline collapsed and they had to look for a new job, because they had to start again right at the bottom.
Of course, a company controlled system like this ties emploees to their company, since they can not just look for a better paying job somewhere else. If they change their job, they'll loose a lot of money.

Jan


User currently offlineTroubleshooter From Germany, joined Feb 2005, 423 posts, RR: 4
Reply 6, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3051 times:

So I´m happy to hold an unrestricted B1 with some nice types on the list Big grin

On the other hand, the licence is half part of the deal. The authorisation issued by the companys quality department the other.



This job sucks!!! I love this job!!!
User currently offlineKaddyuk From Wallis and Futuna, joined Nov 2001, 4126 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 1 day 8 hours ago) and read 3026 times:

What made me get into the Maintenance Industry was an article i read... I dont have access to it anymore but basically it was about the shortage of LAME's and how a large percentage of aircraft would be grounded in 10 years time if the number of people training for licences didnt double.

If you look back, British Airways (or BCAL) used to employ over 250 apprentices engineers. Granted not all would become certifiers, however a large number would get Section L licences.

Look back now... My Apprenticeship Scheme has 40 students... granted we're a smaller outfit than BA... but BA are not running ANY apprenticeship scheme anymore. They run a graduate program and that is it...

There are very few places to get hands on experience with aircraft. You find yourself in the catch 22 situation... you need experience to get a job, but you also need a job to get experience... Its just so difficult to become an aircraft engineer if you dont go through a modern apprenticeship. Some people make it as Maintenance Assistants and then work their way up into a technicians role.

If this does go through, it would cause absolute outrage in the industry for those people who have worked their asses off through 51 weeks of classroom instruction and sat over 14 modular exams...



Whoever said "laughter is the best medicine" never had Gonorrhea
User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31712 posts, RR: 56
Reply 8, posted (8 years 3 months 1 week 4 hours ago) and read 2947 times:

Quoting Kaddyuk (Reply 7):
You find yourself in the catch 22 situation... you need experience to get a job, but you also need a job to get experience...

Thats the sad part of this Field.Currently the Aviation boom out here has helped reduce the Unemployment level.
regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic The End Of The Lame?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
The Beginning Of The End To Multilateral Interline posted Thu Nov 17 2005 21:55:06 by ANother
Beginning Of The End For NDB Procedures posted Fri Jun 10 2005 12:50:25 by CFIcraigAPA
Wicks At The End Of Airbus Wings posted Thu Sep 25 2003 16:40:42 by Bruce
The Size Of The 747 Freighter Opening posted Sat Oct 21 2006 11:34:47 by NZ107
Why The Little Hole At The Bottom Of The Window? posted Tue Oct 17 2006 03:19:07 by Gh123
End Of Runway Before V2 posted Mon Nov 4 2002 00:53:16 by Mjsmigel
Speed Of Air Out Of The GE-90-115's Back End posted Sun Sep 10 2006 01:47:24 by UAL747
Why Should The Fuselage Taper At The End? posted Thu Jul 27 2006 19:28:05 by Gopal
Flat Spin: Is It The End? posted Thu Jan 6 2005 06:04:14 by Sean1234
Two Strobes At The Runway End? posted Wed Jun 5 2002 02:32:46 by Timz

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format