Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Any Recent 787 Pictures..?  
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 13 hours ago) and read 4827 times:

Are there any recent views of the assembly of the 787 available?
It would be interesting to see the progress on the assembly to get an idea on the shedule as compared to suggested first flight.


Please respect animals - don't eat them...
21 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 11 hours ago) and read 4670 times:

...must become a stealth -aircraft ....


Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineWingedMigrator From United States of America, joined Oct 2005, 2133 posts, RR: 56
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 9 hours ago) and read 4634 times:

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 1):
...must become a stealth -aircraft ....

It is a black project after all Big grin

Roll out is in just about 200 days. I would also like to see some recent pictures.


User currently offlineHAWK21M From India, joined Jan 2001, 31573 posts, RR: 57
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 4 hours ago) and read 4585 times:


http://www.boeing.com/commercial/787family/gallery/index.html

regds
MEL



Think of the brighter side!
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 4, posted (7 years 5 months 4 weeks 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 4544 times:

Thanks Hawk for the photo- which is quite old ..
I read in a technical forum related to Carbon-fiber technology, that the under-belly of the 787 would get a skin merely 2 mm thick ....(while other sections like door-frames would be as thick as 8 mm )
It is hard to believe that a 2 mm thick fuselage could sustain a hit from a service-truck without major structural repair.
Now -again in this forum,which seems very calm,technical and down-to -earth ,the possibility of riveted repairs occur for the 787 -but that's contrary to initial claims that the repairs on the 787 would be "easy to fix.."



Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineZvocio79 From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 172 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 1 day 4 hours ago) and read 4095 times:

Now when they hit the plane with a tow truck instead of yelling "sheet metal" now you gonna have to yell "fiber glass". in any event, planes are not designed to be struck by tow trucks, service trucks or the shit truck, though careless people are all over and accidents always occur.
Good luck to the fiber glass guys, they'll have tons of work and tons of dust to breath during their repairs.


User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9378 posts, RR: 52
Reply 6, posted (7 years 5 months 2 weeks 8 hours ago) and read 3941 times:

I work on the 787, but can't say that I do anything that looks interesting at all. The parts that I work on look like copper wire that was run over by about 3 different cars and is all twisted in weird ways. No one that did not know the exact model fo the stator in the electrical generator would have any clue what it was. So I can't say that my work looks particularly interesting.

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 4):
I read in a technical forum related to Carbon-fiber technology, that the under-belly of the 787 would get a skin merely 2 mm thick ....(while other sections like door-frames would be as thick as 8 mm )
It is hard to believe that a 2 mm thick fuselage could sustain a hit from a service-truck without major structural repair.

Material thickness has little to do with strength when you are comparing different materials. Carbon Fiber composites are very strong, but they don't get their strength from thickness like steel or aluminum does. A carbon fiber structure is more like sewing a sweater together. Now it will be very weak when it comes to an isolated thing smashing in to it. You can't just rivet a patch in place and have it be fixed. Drilling holes in carbon fiber makes it weaker.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 7, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 3830 times:

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 6):
Material thickness has little to do with strength when you are comparing different materials. Carbon Fiber composites are very strong, but they don't get their strength from thickness like steel or aluminum does. A carbon fiber structure is more like sewing a sweater together. Now it will be very weak when it comes to an isolated thing smashing in to it. You can't just rivet a patch in place and have it be fixed. Drilling holes in carbon fiber makes it weaker.

Thanks- I appreciate the answer...
Now hwo would the patches on CF repairs look like-riveting or glue ??



Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 16908 posts, RR: 67
Reply 8, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 11 hours ago) and read 3802 times:

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 6):
A carbon fiber structure is more like sewing a sweater together.



Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 7):

Thanks- I appreciate the answer...
Now hwo would the patches on CF repairs look like-riveting or glue ??

The local granny comes along with her knitting gear of course  Wink



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 9, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 10 hours ago) and read 3794 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD DATABASE EDITOR



RoseFlyer, do you happen to know whether the 787 will incorporate nanotubes into the carbon fiber?



2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9378 posts, RR: 52
Reply 10, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3751 times:

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 7):
Now hwo would the patches on CF repairs look like-riveting or glue ??

I don't know how the carbon fiber structure will be repaired. I'm not a material specialist. I don't work with carbon fiber, but rather work on the generators for the 787 among other planes, so I mostly deal with steel and am far more familiar with its properties.

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 8):
The local granny comes along with her knitting gear of course

Haha. It's a little more sophisticated than that. The carbon fiber is similar to other composites in that there is a matrix structure that holds together carbon fiber strands, which look like white whiskers. The carbon fibers are little strands that are contained within the matrix structure. The tensile strength of the material is as strong as the super strong carbon fiber. That means that it can support tension very well. It is hard to pull apart. However the compressive strength is only as strong as the matrix structure. In the A380, they are using aluminum, however they are using a different structure on the 787 that does not have the same properties. Therefore I don't know how it is to be repaired.

Quoting 2H4 (Reply 9):
RoseFlyer, do you happen to know whether the 787 will incorporate nanotubes into the carbon fiber?

No I do not know. I don't know what a nanotube is.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 11, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 6 days 9 hours ago) and read 3749 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD DATABASE EDITOR




Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 10):
No I do not know. I don't know what a nanotube is.

Here you go.



2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineBeaucaire From Syria, joined Sep 2003, 5252 posts, RR: 25
Reply 12, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 17 hours ago) and read 3630 times:

2H4 -very interesting stuff on Nanotubes-thanks for the link...
The potential strength of this material is unbelievable !
Lets steel look like mashed paper...



Please respect animals - don't eat them...
User currently offlineLimaNiner From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 399 posts, RR: 0
Reply 13, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 5 days 2 hours ago) and read 3493 times:

Quoting 2H4 (Reply 9):
do you happen to know whether the 787 will incorporate nanotubes into the carbon fiber?

It was my understanding that carbon nanotubes are still years away from commercial applications...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon_nanotube


User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 14, posted (7 years 5 months 1 week 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 3437 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD DATABASE EDITOR




Quoting LimaNiner (Reply 13):
It was my understanding that carbon nanotubes are still years away from commercial applications...

That may be true regarding the aerospace industry, but nanotube use is quite common in the cycling industry. There's a lot of give and take between the two industries....the aerospace industry invents technologies, but years of certification are required before the technologies are actually utilized.

During that phase, other industries (such as the cycling industry) get to experiment with the stuff. It's interesting to follow the development of various materials and technologies between industries.



2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineKalvado From United States of America, joined Feb 2006, 485 posts, RR: 0
Reply 15, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2981 times:

Quoting 2H4 (Reply 14):

That may be true regarding the aerospace industry, but nanotube use is quite common in the cycling industry.

Last time I checked, noone was making nanotubes by the pound... And I don't believe Boeing will be interested in milligramm quantities.


User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 16, posted (7 years 5 months 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 2978 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD DATABASE EDITOR




Quoting Kalvado (Reply 15):
Last time I checked, noone was making nanotubes by the pound

Easton is. That's not necessarily relevant to the aerospace industry, but it's a sign that progress is being made with that technology.  Smile



2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineLightsaber From United States of America, joined Jan 2005, 12419 posts, RR: 100
Reply 17, posted (7 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 2823 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Quoting Beaucaire (Reply 4):
the possibility of riveted repairs occur for the 787 -but that's contrary to initial claims that the repairs on the 787 would be "easy to fix.."

Actually, rivit repairs w/glue aren't that tough with carbon fiber. Yes drilling weakens it. The fix requires abrading the surface (to create a bonding surface, placing the patch on "wet (w/epoxy)", and riviting it in place. Note: The rivits are temporary to secure the patch while the glue sets, not as the primary final structure. Yes, the patch is weaker than the original structure but there is enough margin for the patch to hold until the next D-check. Small patches would just be applied wet.

The advantage of carbon fiber is many of the current impacts that dent aluminum and thus require a repair will simply bounce off the carbon fiber. I'm not saying these impacts won't weaken the plane. Its just that carbon fiber isn't as sensitive as aluminum due to its rigidity and ability to resist buckling/ripping.

However, I'm not on the 787 program, so perhaps the repair technique has evolved? Anyone?  scratchchin 

Lets face it, the damage people here are discussing would put an aluminum airplane out of service for days!

Quoting RoseFlyer (Reply 6):
Carbon Fiber composites are very strong, but they don't get their strength from thickness like steel or aluminum does.

Ummm... Moment of inertia is moment of inertia. What you're refering to is the tendency to buckle. Carbon fiber's rigidity allows for thinner skin. Not because the stress is less but because it has less of a tendency to buckle.

Now where are the pictures of the 787?  Wink

Lightsaber



I've posted how many times?!?
User currently offlineRoseFlyer From United States of America, joined Feb 2004, 9378 posts, RR: 52
Reply 18, posted (7 years 4 months 4 weeks 15 hours ago) and read 2681 times:

Quoting Lightsaber (Reply 17):
Ummm... Moment of inertia is moment of inertia. What you're refering to is the tendency to buckle. Carbon fiber's rigidity allows for thinner skin. Not because the stress is less but because it has less of a tendency to buckle.

Huh? Stress is the same. I'm not sure what you mean about Carbon Fiber's rigidity. Carbon fiber is only strong in one direction. I don't feel like getting out my mechanics textbook and looking up the difference in modulus of rigidity, but Carbon Fiber is known for its tensile strength. It has no compressive strength. All compressive strength comes from the matrix structure. The loads on a pressurized fuselage are tensile, so that is why carbon fiber is a great material. I'm not sure what moment of inertia has to do with thickness.



If you have never designed an airplane part before, let the real designers do the work!
User currently offlineFirennice From United States of America, joined Jun 2006, 81 posts, RR: 0
Reply 19, posted (7 years 4 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2674 times:

If you are looking for photos of the airplaine unless you are out of japan you wont see any. They are working on the wings and i believe started a few months ago on plane #1.

Here stateside Spirit produced the barrel for plane #1 about 2 weeks ago. It was removed from the autoclave and its mold/mandrel. Our engineer was there as they opened the mandrel/mold.

After inspection it moves to the drill and trim machine to take it to shape before drilling and attaching the interior frame. The drill and trim machine should get it next week, if i heard correctly.

All the photos you have seen were mockups, one runs, parts for testing, destructive testing, etc.

Ser #001 is just on the starting blocks


User currently offline2H4 From United States of America, joined Oct 2004, 8955 posts, RR: 60
Reply 20, posted (7 years 4 months 4 weeks 14 hours ago) and read 2668 times:
AIRLINERS.NET CREW
HEAD DATABASE EDITOR




Quoting Firennice (Reply 19):
The drill and trim machine should get it next week, if i heard correctly.

Any chance you can get hold of a window blank for me?  eyebrow 



2H4





Intentionally Left Blank
User currently offlineN231YE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 21, posted (7 years 4 months 4 weeks 5 hours ago) and read 2597 times:

This seems to be a proof-of-concept section; not to be used on a 787. But since this is section is made of actual composites, it should be a good indication of what is going on right now.


http://www.boeing.com/commercial/gallery/787/k63374.html

Quote:
LE BOURGET, France, June 13, 2005 -- The first 787 Dreamliner nose section has been completed in Wichita, Kan. The section, a single composite part with a high degree of contour, is one element of the development activity being conducted to prove manufacturing techniques for the all-new jetliner. The team will cut doors and windows in the weeks ahead and conduct thorough testing to ensure that all expectations for reliability and accuracy are met.


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Any Recent 787 Pictures..?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
FYI 787 Progress posted Sat Nov 11 2006 00:11:54 by Firennice
Help! Any Good General Tips On 747-400F's posted Thu Oct 26 2006 04:47:09 by RJwrench85
787 Belt Loadin posted Thu Aug 17 2006 18:33:46 by 4xRuv
Did A Boeing 747 -100 Have Any New Tech? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 22:09:08 by 747400sp
Farnborough, Any Airways Closures? posted Sun Jul 16 2006 16:34:27 by XXXX10
Did JAL Have Any PW JT9D-7R4G2 Passenger 747 200? posted Mon Jul 3 2006 00:14:50 by 747400sp
Carbon Fiber And The 787 posted Sat Jul 1 2006 19:44:06 by Firennice
757 And 767 RB211 Is There Any Difference In Size? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 14:38:00 by Edumotoki
787 Electric-Compressor Pressurization posted Wed Jun 7 2006 18:48:41 by Redcordes
Tail Strike Protection - Is Any Automated? posted Mon May 22 2006 00:12:21 by JulianUK

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format