Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Max Payload On 747-400ERF Lower Than On 747-400F?  
User currently offlineBA From United States of America, joined May 2000, 11151 posts, RR: 59
Posted (7 years 6 months 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 7653 times:

I was looking at this 747 Freighter brochure from the 2005 Paris Air Show and it struck my attention that with the higher MZFW option, the 747-400ERF has slightly lower structural payload than the 747-400F, 272,600 lb versus 273,300 lb.

http://www.boeing.com/news/feature/p...ts/bca_pdf/specs/747_Freighter.pdf

Why is this the case?

Other then that, the specifications of the 747-400F and the 747-400ERF with the higher MZFW option appear to be identical. The range for both is listed as 2,815 nm, the MZFW for both is listed as 635,000 lb and the MTOW for both is listed as 811,000 lb.

Does this mean the advantage of the 747-400ERF over the 747-400F is pretty much only if the higher MZFW option is not selected? Makes you wonder why it is offered on the 747-400ERF to begin with.

Any feedback would be greatly appreciated.


"Generosity is giving more than you can, and pride is taking less than you need." - Khalil Gibran
4 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offline744rules From Belgium, joined Mar 2002, 407 posts, RR: 0
Reply 1, posted (7 years 6 months 1 day 12 hours ago) and read 7590 times:

don't know about the -400erf, but when you have the increased zfw on the -400 ( between 276000 and 288000) you're max tow is decreased. This means it's either max range or max payload.

User currently offlinePolymerPlane From United States of America, joined May 2006, 991 posts, RR: 3
Reply 2, posted (7 years 6 months 20 hours ago) and read 7550 times:

I am not an expert, but IIRC, The difference between 744ERF and 744F is basically increase in MTOW and additional fuel tanks. I think this modification makes the 744ERF has slightly higher OEW. For the optional MZFW, the MTOW is basically limited to the same weight. Thus, your structural payload is lower on ERF.

BTW I still can't understand why any company would buy 744ERF with the optional MZFW. You basically do not need higher OEW from additional fuel tanks and structural modifications, since your maximum range is only 2800 nm anyway, and you don't use the higher TOW on 744ERF.

Cheers,
PP



One day there will be 100% polymer plane
User currently offlineRJ111 From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 6 months 9 hours ago) and read 7517 times:

The 744ERF has the same max payload 112t or 123t (optional) as the 744F. Just it has a higher takeoff weight thus can fill up the tanks more when that payload is added. The tanks are the same size as the 744F and 744, but fuel is weight restriced at the top payloads.

Quoting 744rules (Reply 1):
don't know about the -400erf, but when you have the increased zfw on the -400 ( between 276000 and 288000) you're max tow is decreased. This means it's either max range or max payload.

The MTOW isn't decreased - it's increased. Compared to the 112t MSP version the max useable fuel capacity is +10t and the MZFW is increased +11t but the MTOW is only inceased +9t. So the MTOW is the limiting factor depending how far you're flying it. But then again, MTOW is always the limiting factor, just seems to be more pronounced on the 123t version. These are all paper ratings though.

At least that's how i understand it.   

Source http://www.boeing.com/commercial/airports/acaps/7474sec2.pdf

[Edited 2006-10-23 13:40:41]

User currently offline747Loadmaster From Germany, joined Oct 2004, 59 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 6 months 6 hours ago) and read 7492 times:

Quoting 744rules (Reply 1):
don't know about the -400erf, but when you have the increased zfw on the -400 ( between 276000 and 288000) you're max tow is decreased. This means it's either max range or max payload.

That is correct, if you use increased ZFW, MTW comes down.
I will post the exact amount tomorrow


Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Max Payload On 747-400ERF Lower Than On 747-400F?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Is A 707 Harder To Turn Than A 747? posted Fri Jul 28 2006 21:54:56 by 747400sp
Do KC-135 Land Flater And Lower Than 707's? posted Wed Sep 13 2006 22:44:13 by 747400sp
Requesting Lower Than 250KIAS Climb Speed posted Wed Jan 25 2006 00:27:16 by AM
Help! Any Good General Tips On 747-400F's posted Thu Oct 26 2006 04:47:09 by RJwrench85
Cargo Door On 747-400F? posted Mon Dec 3 2001 06:37:44 by Sunilgupta
What's This Little Hump On The 747? posted Sat Jul 22 2006 18:48:45 by Alphafloor
Question On 747-400 Slat Retraction posted Wed Jun 28 2006 19:53:37 by UPSMD11
Why Was The JT9D-70A So Rare On 747's posted Fri Jun 2 2006 23:45:50 by 747400sp
Holes On The Cowlings Of The 747? posted Sun Apr 16 2006 02:58:58 by CalAir
Stains On 747's Nose - What's The Cause? posted Sat Mar 25 2006 17:59:58 by Mr Spaceman

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format