BA84 From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 372 posts, RR: 4 Posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3944 times:
Obviously these guys know their airplane intimately, but of course, the passengers are oblivious. Is this done by European or NA carriers? Pilots, come in.....
Futurecaptain From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 1, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3906 times:
We try not to t/o or land with a tailwind, but in some cases it is not possible. Although with the wind 090/15 as the photographer says I probably wouldn't have used runway 27. But then again, I dont fly planes burning gas at a rate of thousands of pounds per hour either.
For example, in a C-152 you increase your t/o distance by 10% for every 2 knots of tailwind. If a similar formula is used for heavies (someone else can chime in here) then you could simply run out of runway with a strong enough tailwind.
HeliflyerPDC From Belgium, joined Sep 2006, 128 posts, RR: 0 Reply 2, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3899 times:
I believe that take-off with tailwind is NOT allowed. It obviously dangerous. Probably these pilots had something of a "weight and balance "issue. (but of course I don't know the real circumstances)
OPNLguy From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR: Reply 3, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 3848 times:
Not a pilot, but a dispatcher, and tailwind takeoffs are done in some cases.
Each aircraft has its own specific values, but generally speaking, most aircraft are limited to a max of 10 knots of tailwind on takeoff. It helps greatly to have ample runway to do so, since a tailwind takeoff has the same effect as shortening the runway, which results in a lower maximum takeoff weight, and one sometimes lower to the point where one has to leave folks behind.
Many times, tailwind takeoffs will be used so the aircraft departure path is over area-A versus area-B, and you ususally see this for late night ops and/or noise abatement. Should the surface winds increase such that the tailwind component exceeds what the aircraft can do, they'll switch the runways around where aircraft are again operating into the wind. That's supposed to be the way it works, and usually does, but human compliance is another issue entirely.
Now, as far as the comments in Sam's photos are concerned, I have no idea what the max tailwind is for a IL-86 takeoff. That said, lifting off so close to the end of the runway, you "wonder" if they'd have had enough runway to stop had they aborted the takeoff.
Starlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 14992 posts, RR: 69 Reply 6, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 23 hours ago) and read 3595 times:
Quoting HeliflyerPDC (Reply 2): I believe that take-off with tailwind is NOT allowed. It obviously dangerous.
As has been explained, tail wind take off are allowed under certain circumstances. Limiting factors are windspeed and direction, runway length and max tire speed.
Tact Is For People Who Aren't Witty Enough To Be Sarcastic
Vikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 6059 posts, RR: 27 Reply 7, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 22 hours ago) and read 3583 times:
Quoting OPNLguy (Reply 3): Now, as far as the comments in Sam's photos are concerned, I have no idea what the max tailwind is for a IL-86 takeoff. That said, lifting off so close to the end of the runway, you "wonder" if they'd have had enough runway to stop had they aborted the takeoff.
Not to mention, at least in the US, I believe you have to be at least 35 feet above ground by the end of the runway (if there's no stopway or whatever). Don't know if the FAA would pay you a visit if you weren't, or what.
~Vik
The spirit of Massachusetts is the spirit of America!
Goldenshield From United States of America, joined Jan 2001, 4955 posts, RR: 15 Reply 8, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3549 times:
Quoting Vikkyvik (Reply 7): Not to mention, at least in the US, I believe you have to be at least 35 feet above ground by the end of the runway (if there's no stopway or whatever). Don't know if the FAA would pay you a visit if you weren't, or what.
For turbine-engine powered transport planes certified in the U.S. after September 30, 1958, takeoff performance calculations must ensure that the aircraft can takeoff and climb out over a clearway past the the end of the runway. The clearway is defined as an extended area beyond the runway 500 feet wide with a grade of 1.25% where no object, except for approach lighting 26" high or less, may extend.
Two all beef patties, special sauce, lettuce, cheese, pickles, onions on a sesame seed bun.
Vikkyvik From United States of America, joined Jul 2003, 6059 posts, RR: 27 Reply 9, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3531 times:
Quoting Goldenshield (Reply 8):
For turbine-engine powered transport planes certified in the U.S. after September 30, 1958, takeoff performance calculations must ensure that the aircraft can takeoff and climb out over a clearway past the the end of the runway. The clearway is defined as an extended area beyond the runway 500 feet wide with a grade of 1.25% where no object, except for approach lighting 26" high or less, may extend.
Please correct me if I'm wrong, but my interpretation of the previous paragraph is that as long as your wheels are off the ground by the runway end, you can climb at a grade of 1.26% and be legal. Is that correct?
Also, is the approach lighting height supposed to be 26 feet, as opposed to inches?
Lastly, is there a distance from the end of the runway to which the clearway extends?
Thanks for your input, Goldenshield.
~Vik
The spirit of Massachusetts is the spirit of America!
Lowrider From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 3220 posts, RR: 12 Reply 10, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 21 hours ago) and read 3524 times:
Quoting Vikkyvik (Reply 9): Please correct me if I'm wrong, but my interpretation of the previous paragraph is that as long as your wheels are off the ground by the runway end, you can climb at a grade of 1.26% and be legal. Is that correct?
Depends upon the climb segment. If memory serves, the first segment goes from rotation to 35 feet agl, and only a positive rate, with one engine inop, must be maintained. Second segment goes from 35 feet to 400 feet agl, and a 2.4 percent climb grade must be with one engine inop. In the third segment I think the required grade drops to 1.2 percent and it must be maintained to a height which clears all obstructions or 1500 feet, which ever is higher, and the final segment is for acceleration and clean up. It has been a while since I looked at my notes for this, so I won't swear to the numbers. To tell the truth, I just did a quick search for them and can't lay my hands on them at the moment. But in general terms, that is how the take off profile goes.
Broke From United States of America, joined Apr 2002, 1322 posts, RR: 4 Reply 11, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 3459 times:
The runway at La Paz, Bolivia has a 2% gradient. No matter which way the wind is blowing you takeoff going downhill. The takeoff I experienced from the jumpseat was a pip!!
The tower called out an 8 knot tailwind, but the windsock was straight out!!
At sea level that translates to about 15-20 knots. La Paz is at 13,500' above sea level.
So off we went downhill and the airspeed didn't do anything for about 3,000' and the approach lights at the other end came up awfully fast and awfully near to us as we went over them.
Not a takeoff for the white knuckled passenger!!
Zeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 6562 posts, RR: 72 Reply 12, posted (5 years 3 months 2 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 3412 times:
Quoting BA84 (Thread starter): Obviously these guys know their airplane intimately, but of course, the passengers are oblivious. Is this done by European or NA carriers? Pilots, come in.....
That is runway 27 at Phuket, it has an offset ILS, it is the preferred runway for takeoff and landing.
RW 09 only has a non precision approaches, and a hill on the takeoff path. The ILS on RW 27 is offset to avoid that hill.
RW 27 is downhill, with nothing but ocean for miles and miles.
Quoting HeliflyerPDC (Reply 2): I believe that take-off with tailwind is NOT allowed. It obviously dangerous. Probably these pilots had something of a "weight and balance "issue. (but of course I don't know the real circumstances)
Most jets that I know of are certified for takeoff with 10kt of tailwind. I can think of a number of airports that are normally only allow takeoff and landing in certain directions, where either tailwind on landing or takeoff happens.
Quoting Vikkyvik (Reply 7): Not to mention, at least in the US, I believe you have to be at least 35 feet above ground by the end of the runway (if there's no stopway or whatever). Don't know if the FAA would pay you a visit if you weren't, or what.
Screen heights are more to do with one engine inoperative situations, and the screen height changes with the condition of the runway, it is lower for a we runway.
Sponsor Message: 
From Canada, joined Aug 2004, 372 posts, 
From , joined Dec 1969, posts, 
From Belgium, joined Sep 2006, 128 posts, 
From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 14992 posts, 
From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 6562 posts, 
Sponsor Message: 
Printer friendly format
