Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Relationship Between DC-8 And DC-9 Fuse  
User currently offlineSpeedracer1407 From United States of America, joined Dec 2004, 333 posts, RR: 0
Posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 10 hours ago) and read 5673 times:

A recent thread about the DC-8 in CivAv suggests that, after extensive redesign from the failed tanker program to commercial production, the plane was made marginally wider than the 707 and had 6 abreast seating.

I've always thought that the DC-8 and DC-9 had had a structural relationship similar to that of the 707, 727, and 737. That is, the DC-9 shared the same cross section dimensions (and a very similar nose) as the DC-8 even if the two don't share the "same" fuselage. I seem to recall that DC-8s and 9s all had 5 abreast seating because they were actually narrower than the 707/727/737. Am I simply wrong? And either way, what exactly is the relationship between the DC- and DC-9 fuse?

Dassault Mercure: the plane that has Boeing and Airbus shaking in their boots.
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineStealthZ From Australia, joined Feb 2005, 5898 posts, RR: 38
Reply 1, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 8 hours ago) and read 5654 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

They were not as similar as many think.. even the Boeing aircraft
DC-8-12ft 3in W 13ft 6.5in H
DC-9-11ft W 11ft 10in H

707-12ft 4in W 14ft 2.5inH
727/737 12ft 4in W 12ft 2in H

As you can see the DC-8 was only very slightly narrower than the 707/727/737, In fact the 707 was a widened version of the KC135 due to the extra width in the DC-8.


If your camera sends text messages, that could explain why your photos are rubbish!
User currently offlineN231YE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (9 years 6 months 1 week 5 hours ago) and read 5623 times:

Quoting StealthZ (Reply 1):
In fact the 707 was a widened version of the KC135

If I am not mistaken, the KC-135 is based off of the 367-80, which was designed to only allow for 5-abreast seating. In order to compete with the 6-abreast DC-8, Boeing lengthened the fuselage on the model 707 to allow for 6-abreast seating. Although the 707 and the KC-135 are similar, the fuselage cross-section dimensions is what sets them apart (among other things).

User currently offline57AZ From United States of America, joined Nov 2004, 2586 posts, RR: 2
Reply 3, posted (9 years 6 months 6 days 12 hours ago) and read 5507 times:

Don't forget that Boeing widened the 707 twice. First the airlines complained about the width of the 367-80 so the design was widened and tooling manufactured for that production design. Douglas then came out with a slightly wider cross section for the DC-8 in an attempt to deal a blow to Boeing. Boeing did not want to lose their upper hand and bit the bullet-redesigning the 707 cross section AGAIN at considerable cost as new tooling was required. Boeing waited until Douglas had produced their production tooling, knowing that Douglas could not afford to change the DC-8 once it went into production. Remember that when the 707 was transformed from a paper airplane to reality, the DC-8 was still paper only and the specs could be easily changed.

Boeing also found it advantageous to tailor the 707 variants to individual client's needs concerning interior or performance within reason. With the DC-8, what you saw was what you got.

"When a man runs on railroads over half of his lifetime he is fit for nothing else-and at times he don't know that."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Relationship Between DC-8 And DC-9 Fuse
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
Relationship Between DC-8 And DC-9 Fuse posted Sun Nov 26 2006 10:44:45 by Speedracer1407
Differences In Aviation Law/ops Between US And GB posted Fri Feb 10 2006 21:12:39 by AC21365
Differences Between US And UK Air Traffic Control posted Fri Nov 25 2005 08:51:10 by Bruce
Relations Between Pilots And Mechanics. posted Sat Oct 15 2005 21:30:18 by SlamClick
The Difference Between Flying And Surfing? posted Wed Sep 14 2005 02:58:18 by Ps76
Questions On Some Differences Between B737 And A319/320 posted Wed Jun 8 2005 06:15:55 by DCAflyboy
Difference Between Flaps And Slats? posted Fri Apr 1 2005 17:36:42 by JAM747
Differences Between Boeing And Airbus Wing Designs posted Sat Feb 5 2005 23:53:59 by Thrust
Connection Between Pilots And Musicians? posted Sat Aug 21 2004 06:28:56 by SSTjumbo
Difference Between -ER And -LR Variants posted Sat Jun 26 2004 08:22:30 by Ismangun
What Is The Difference Between Line And Hangar Mx? posted Tue Mar 9 2010 17:45:46 by LHCVG
Difference Between Transatlantic And Transpacific? posted Sat Nov 28 2009 00:51:59 by Jayeshrulz
Differences Between TWA And NWA Pars? posted Tue Jun 9 2009 15:14:54 by KingAir200
Difference Between A DC-8-71 And A -73 posted Tue Jul 25 2006 02:23:39 by Jeffry747
DC-10: The Relation Between Ailerons And Gear posted Thu Nov 14 2002 15:23:48 by LMML 14/32
Difference Between Runway And Departure posted Tue Apr 24 2012 05:50:54 by smartt1982
Difference Between MSL And FL ALtitudes? posted Sun Mar 25 2012 21:56:49 by wardialer
Fuel Stop Between Gulf And US West Coast posted Sun Mar 20 2011 22:42:04 by blueflyer
Operational Difference Between ATR And Dash-8 MLG? posted Thu Sep 16 2010 13:03:10 by OyKIE
The Line Between Safety And Regulations posted Mon Jul 12 2010 11:37:36 by c5load
What Is The Difference Between Line And Hangar Mx? posted Tue Mar 9 2010 17:45:46 by LHCVG

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format