Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Canadair CL-600 Regional Jet CRJ-440LR  
User currently offlineAbleToFly From Denmark, joined Nov 2006, 118 posts, RR: 0
Posted (8 years 4 days 21 hours ago) and read 2733 times:

Hey out there.
I just came across this picture. A Bombardier CRJ specified as a CRJ440LR.
I couldn't find anything about it either on a.net's own 'aircraft data' nor could I find anything on Bombardier's own site.


View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ralph Duenas - Jetwash Images



What the difference from the CRJ200's?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineLowrider From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 3220 posts, RR: 10
Reply 1, posted (8 years 4 days 18 hours ago) and read 2700 times:

Quoting AbleToFly (Thread starter):
What the difference from the CRJ200's?

I have never heard of a 440LR. So as far as I know, there is no difference. From the training and certification standpoint, they are both CL-65-2B19's. Pinnicle's CRJs are same as all the other 50 seat versions, only with fewer seats. The 100 and 200 have very minor differences, and different companies may select slightly different options, but I don't think Bombardier built a long range version



Proud OOTSK member
User currently offlineIlikeyyc From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1373 posts, RR: 20
Reply 2, posted (8 years 4 days 17 hours ago) and read 2685 times:

Quoting AbleToFly (Thread starter):
What the difference from the CRJ200's?

Its the same plane. The only difference is that the 440 is certified to hold 44 seats, where as the 200 is certified to hold 50 (there are 40 seat versions too). The reason for the 44 seats is for scope clause purposes.



Fighting Absurdity with Absurdity!
User currently offlineEMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9364 posts, RR: 11
Reply 3, posted (8 years 4 days 15 hours ago) and read 2660 times:

Quoting Ilikeyyc (Reply 2):
Its the same plane. The only difference is that the 440 is certified to hold 44 seats,

Yup... they just removed the seats and ad in a bigger closet. Comair has a few as well....



"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"
User currently offlineXFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 4229 posts, RR: 37
Reply 4, posted (8 years 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2601 times:

THe 440LR's do not exist anymore. The cabinets have been removed and replaced with seats... thus we have all 200LR's now.


Chicks dig winglets.
User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (7 years 12 months 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 2510 times:

In the same fashion, Jazz has CRJ-705s, which are 900s certified to 75 seats for scope purposes. The extra room allows for J class and better legroom.

User currently offlineSalomon From Canada, joined Jun 2006, 205 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 12 months 17 hours ago) and read 2421 times:

Why didnt they use the extra space for more legroom?


Takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory.
User currently offlineThePinnacleKid From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 731 posts, RR: 8
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2340 times:

Quoting Salomon (Reply 6):
Why didnt they use the extra space for more legroom?

Because you might actually enjoy being on an RJ and there is No Way anyone at mainline corporate would want that. = )



"Sonny, did we land? or were we shot down?"
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6428 posts, RR: 3
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 11 hours ago) and read 2337 times:

Quoting ThePinnacleKid (Reply 7):
Because you might actually enjoy being on an RJ and there is No Way anyone at mainline corporate would want that. = )

I guess that's why NW dumped ELP...they didn't want their pax to be comfy on the 4 hour hop from MSP to ELP. I always wondered why MSP-RAP got an A319 while they threw a Barbie Jet at ELP  irked 



Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
User currently offlineAvt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2132 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 5 days 7 hours ago) and read 2325 times:

The reason airlines throw RJs onto routes is to make money. Why can't they flight Boeings or Airbi on every route? Because you, the consumer will change airlines for a $5 difference in fare. Yes folks, we are responsible for all the bad service and small aircraft, and no pillows, because that is exactly what we have asked for when we consistently book the cheapest flight we can. It's inevitable.

Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Canadair CL-600 Regional Jet CRJ-440LR
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Embrear Regional Jet Door Operation posted Sun Nov 23 2003 06:55:36 by Flyboy80
Lights & Radar On Regional Jet's Nosecone? posted Sun Sep 8 2002 21:13:09 by Mr Spaceman
Canadair CRJ-200 Rocks posted Wed Sep 22 2004 16:21:34 by Ariis
Canadair Regional Jets 100 & 200 posted Sun Aug 31 2003 07:12:21 by Bruce
American Eagle EMB Vs CRJ Regional Jets posted Thu Nov 15 2001 06:00:41 by Zebfly2
How Much Water Can A Jet Take? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 21:11:45 by Kearney
What Happens If You Put Petrol In A Jet? posted Sat Dec 2 2006 02:53:27 by RichM
A340-600 Why No Body Gear Steering? posted Fri Nov 3 2006 18:16:18 by BALandorLivery
Boeing 737-600/700 Versus Embraer ERJ-195 posted Fri Oct 6 2006 09:45:33 by AerospaceFan
A340-600 RTO Test -- What Happened? posted Thu Sep 28 2006 10:24:31 by Brenintw

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format