Canadair CL-600 Regional Jet CRJ-440LR — Tech Ops Forum

Sponsor Message:


My Starred Topics \| Profile \| New Topic \| Forum Index \| Help \| Search

Canadair CL-600 Regional Jet CRJ-440LR

AbleToFly From Denmark, joined Nov 2006, 112 posts, RR: 0
Posted (6 years 5 months 1 week 2 days 2 hours ago) and read 2032 times:

Hey out there.
I just came across this picture. A Bombardier CRJ specified as a CRJ440LR.
I couldn't find anything about it either on a.net's own 'aircraft data' nor could I find anything on Bombardier's own site.

View Large View Medium
Click here for bigger photo!

Photo © Ralph Duenas - Jetwash Images

What the difference from the CRJ200's?

9 replies: All unread, jump to last

Lowrider From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 3220 posts, RR: 11
Reply 1, posted (6 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 1999 times:

Quoting AbleToFly (Thread starter):
What the difference from the CRJ200's?

I have never heard of a 440LR. So as far as I know, there is no difference. From the training and certification standpoint, they are both CL-65-2B19's. Pinnicle's CRJs are same as all the other 50 seat versions, only with fewer seats. The 100 and 200 have very minor differences, and different companies may select slightly different options, but I don't think Bombardier built a long range version

Proud OOTSK member

Ilikeyyc From United States of America, joined Dec 2003, 1373 posts, RR: 22
Reply 2, posted (6 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1984 times:

Quoting AbleToFly (Thread starter):
What the difference from the CRJ200's?

Its the same plane. The only difference is that the 440 is certified to hold 44 seats, where as the 200 is certified to hold 50 (there are 40 seat versions too). The reason for the 44 seats is for scope clause purposes.

Fighting Absurdity with Absurdity!

EMBQA From United States of America, joined Oct 2003, 9286 posts, RR: 13
Reply 3, posted (6 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 20 hours ago) and read 1959 times:

Quoting Ilikeyyc (Reply 2):
Its the same plane. The only difference is that the 440 is certified to hold 44 seats,

Yup... they just removed the seats and ad in a bigger closet. Comair has a few as well....

"It's not the size of the dog in the fight, but the size of the fight in the dog"

XFSUgimpLB41X From United States of America, joined Aug 2000, 3952 posts, RR: 36
Reply 4, posted (6 years 5 months 1 week 1 day 11 hours ago) and read 1900 times:

THe 440LR's do not exist anymore. The cabinets have been removed and replaced with seats... thus we have all 200LR's now.

Chicks dig winglets.

Avt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2131 posts, RR: 5
Reply 5, posted (6 years 5 months 3 days 21 hours ago) and read 1809 times:

In the same fashion, Jazz has CRJ-705s, which are 900s certified to 75 seats for scope purposes. The extra room allows for J class and better legroom.

Salomon From Canada, joined Jun 2006, 205 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (6 years 4 months 4 weeks 1 day 22 hours ago) and read 1720 times:

Why didnt they use the extra space for more legroom?

Takeoffs are optional; landings are mandatory.

ThePinnacleKid From United States of America, joined Feb 2005, 672 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1639 times:

Quoting Salomon (Reply 6):
Why didnt they use the extra space for more legroom?

Because you might actually enjoy being on an RJ and there is No Way anyone at mainline corporate would want that. = )

"Sonny, did we land? or were we shot down?"

KELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 5932 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 1636 times:

Quoting ThePinnacleKid (Reply 7):
Because you might actually enjoy being on an RJ and there is No Way anyone at mainline corporate would want that. = )

I guess that's why NW dumped ELP...they didn't want their pax to be comfy on the 4 hour hop from MSP to ELP. I always wondered why MSP-RAP got an A319 while they threw a Barbie Jet at ELP irked

Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)

Avt007 From Canada, joined Jul 2000, 2131 posts, RR: 5
Reply 9, posted (6 years 4 months 3 weeks 4 days 13 hours ago) and read 1624 times:

The reason airlines throw RJs onto routes is to make money. Why can't they flight Boeings or Airbi on every route? Because you, the consumer will change airlines for a $5 difference in fare. Yes folks, we are responsible for all the bad service and small aircraft, and no pillows, because that is exactly what we have asked for when we consistently book the cheapest flight we can. It's inevitable.

Top Of Page

Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Canadair CL-600 Regional Jet CRJ-440LR

Username:	No username? Sign up now!
Password:	Forgot Password? Be reminded. Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)

Tech/Ops related posts only!
Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
No hostile language or criticizing of others.
Do not post copyright protected material.
Use relevant and describing topics.
Check if your post already been discussed.
Check your spelling!
DETAILED RULES

Check Spelling

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics: