Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s  
User currently offlineMD11Fanatic From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 81 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 6 hours ago) and read 8891 times:

I was talking to a DC-10 pilot from Omni the other day and he mentioned that planes from the original KSSU configuration were a lot less capable due to more primitive avionics and autopilot capabilities as compared to the later ATLAS configurations.

Can anyone add to this?

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineVC-10 From United Kingdom, joined Oct 1999, 3702 posts, RR: 34
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 4 weeks 1 day 3 hours ago) and read 8876 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

From a maintenance POV ATLAS & KSSU were two different airline consortium's that pooled their resources to maintain the DC10. All I can remember about the ATLAS group was AF did the CF6 overhauls.

It would be reasonable to assume all the operators within a group would have all their a/c with the same avionic fit.


User currently offlineBwaflyer From United Kingdom, joined Jun 2004, 690 posts, RR: 0
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 16 hours ago) and read 8836 times:

KSSU - I believe was KLM, Swissair, Sabena, and UTA

User currently offlineCdekoe From United States of America, joined Nov 2006, 57 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 8767 times:

I don't know about KSSU vs. ATLAS, but the KLM & Martinair DC-10-30's were CAT IIIc certified and the FMS systems were state of the art. Compared to the B747-200's in the fleet the DC-10 was far more sophisticated.


We can't solve problems by using the same kind of thinking we used when we created them.
User currently offlineXms3200 From Sweden, joined Apr 2005, 109 posts, RR: 0
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 1 day 7 hours ago) and read 8736 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

KSSU - KLM, SAS, UTA, Swissair

ATLAS - Aitalia, Lufthansa, Iberia, Air France, Sabena

The avionics in all the KSSU a/c were top notch compared to the ATLAS a/c in my opinion


User currently offlineTimT From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 168 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 8 hours ago) and read 8652 times:

NWA's DC-10 were all KSSU. They tried to get the Cat III thing going and never made it. I've spent 8-10 hours getting one to pass the tests, and on the first flight it would fail. Everytime. As far as differences? I think the part numbers are the same for all the pitch & roll computers. Maybe a different dash number. NWA also disabled the CWS and TURB modes on the A/P. Atlas did not.

User currently offlineMD11Fanatic From United States of America, joined Oct 2006, 81 posts, RR: 0
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 5 days 6 hours ago) and read 8643 times:

KSSU aircraft sound like they're a lot less capable. Who'd want that?

User currently offlineTZTriStar500 From United States of America, joined Jan 2004, 1453 posts, RR: 9
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 1 week 3 days 18 hours ago) and read 8605 times:

ATLAS and KSSU also translated to galley standards and became the major industry specifications for galley carts, carriers, trays, etc. ATLAS has now become the majority galley standard for most airlines, though some still use KSSU while some others use their own custom specifications which are modifications of the ATLAS or KSSU standard.


35 years of American Trans Air/ATA Airlines, 1973-2008. A great little airline that will not be soon forgotten.
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
135 Vs 136 Engines For JSF posted Wed Apr 5 2006 01:09:18 by DEVILFISH
DOI Vs. DLI!?! -> For OPS-experts And Pilots posted Fri Apr 22 2005 16:56:05 by FRASYD
NWA Replacement For DC-10? posted Sat Dec 30 2000 01:49:13 by Nwa_mech
Question For DC-10 & MD-11 Pilots! posted Tue Oct 3 2000 23:52:16 by SW737-700
Destiny For DC-10/L-1011 posted Sat Jun 10 2000 02:34:02 by Mason
Cruis/speeds, Etc. Needed For DC-10 posted Fri May 5 2000 20:19:17 by Ual757
DC-8 Vs 707 Today posted Tue Oct 31 2006 05:49:17 by DLKAPA
DC-8 Vs B-707: posted Sat Aug 19 2006 06:23:54 by Blackbird
DC-10 Towbar For An L1011 posted Thu Jul 13 2006 06:40:17 by B52murph
Lift-to-Drag Ratio Vs. Velocity For An SST...? posted Tue Oct 4 2005 03:36:06 by Lehpron

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format