Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Why Is There Still Aircraft Radio Splutter?  
User currently offlineJamesbuk From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 3968 posts, RR: 4
Posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 7303 times:

Hi guys and girls,

Well here i am, i'm in the room were we have the pc in the house, and in the next room is a normal radio, picking up the local radio station and its playing some music in nice good quality, nothing unusual right? so why is it that aircraft radio transmissions are always very low quality? its very hard to make out what they are staying over the fizzing of the radio unless your experienced. So why has this quality not been introduced into aviation? It could save runway incursions as it would be clearer and no reason not to hear your callsign etc.

I understand you may not get the quality at 36k feet, but radio transmissions (as in music radio) works quality wise very well up to 6000 feet i believe, so it would be useful for when the most talking is done (approach and departue)

So why isnt it used?

Rgds --James--


You cant have your cake and eat it... What the hells the point in having it then!!!
11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17172 posts, RR: 66
Reply 1, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 7 hours ago) and read 7296 times:

Interesting question. So here is my theory:
- Still analog with potential for distortion.
- "Good enough" for the purpose so not much incentive to make it better.
- Moving transmitter/receiver makes exact modulation tricky.
- Interference from atmospheric effects and terrain coupled to the above.

In theory, if everyone went to digital satellite comms this would all improve, but I don't see traditional radios going away anytime soon.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineSPREE34 From United States of America, joined Jun 2004, 2264 posts, RR: 9
Reply 2, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 7293 times:

Perhaps it's your Airband receiver or antenna? With a few exceptions, I've heard mostly clear transmissions from aircraft over my 30+ years as an ATCer and Flyer.
You won't ever get FM quality sound from AM, but AM is fine for voice.



I don't understand everything I don't know about this.
User currently offlineSlamClick From United States of America, joined Nov 2003, 10062 posts, RR: 68
Reply 3, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 7292 times:

There is? I always wondered why the controllers were always frying fish!

One factor could be horsepower so to speak. Even my hokey local station boasts "fifty thousand pots of wower" (watts of power) Our Cessnoid doesn't.



Happiness is not seeing another trite Ste. Maarten photo all week long.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17172 posts, RR: 66
Reply 4, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 7289 times:

Quoting SlamClick (Reply 3):
Even my hokey local station boasts "fifty thousand pots of wower" (watts of power)

Are you sure that isn't 50k milliwatts? I loved it when my local station in Stockholm went "TEN THOUSAND MILLIWATT MUSIC POWER!!!!" with an echo sound effect.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineJamesbuk From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 3968 posts, RR: 4
Reply 5, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 7279 times:

Quoting SPREE34 (Reply 2):

I dont have an airband. I went up in a tower at an airfield (Cranfield/EGTC) and they had big overhead speakers and it was still fuzzy, and in the cessna's (yes i know there old) it was fuzzy as well.

Quoting SPREE34 (Reply 2):
I've heard mostly clear transmissions from aircraft over my 30+ years as an ATCer and Flyer.

Yeh but if you look at my original post it was "If you arent used to it" you've been on the end of it for 30 years, you'd make it out perfect, when you started you have to admit maybe for the first week or so of working as ATC it was understandable but you had to think.

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 1):
In theory, if everyone went to digital satellite comms this would all improve, but I don't see traditional radios going away anytime soon.

Yeh it would, the only problem would be a 2-3 second delay from the signal going to the sattelite and back (if you have SKY Tv turn it on and a normal terrestrial tv, on the same channel the sky will come through a couple seconds later)

Rgds --James--



You cant have your cake and eat it... What the hells the point in having it then!!!
User currently offlineAAR90 From United States of America, joined Jan 2000, 3494 posts, RR: 46
Reply 6, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 7276 times:

Quoting Jamesbuk (Thread starter):
its very hard to make out what they are staying over the fizzing of the radio unless your experienced. So why has this quality not been introduced into aviation?

You do not specify what receiver you are using and what location(s) you are using it at. Primary reasons for poor reception are antenna locations and atmospheric interference within the radio frequency bands being used. Within my current aircraft (B738) my perception of radio clarity was greatly improved with the switch to BOSE QCII headset. I had previously used Telex & Sundhousen ANR headsets (and other non-ANR sets) which were "okay" but not exceptional. My current FO uses a Lightspeed earplug style boom-mic set that he loves as well.



*NO CARRIER* -- A Naval Aviator's worst nightmare!
User currently offlineFredT From United Kingdom, joined Feb 2002, 2185 posts, RR: 26
Reply 7, posted (7 years 11 months 4 weeks 6 hours ago) and read 7268 times:

It's an AM vs. FM thing. Then it is an issue of station output power.

We still use AM rather than FM as

a) It is proven, relatively simple technology

b) If one FM transmission steps on another, you get nothing at all. If one AM transmission steps on another, you'll know it.

c) AM uses less bandwidth, so you can jam more frequencies into the same spectrum.



I thought I was doing good trying to avoid those airport hotels... and look at me now.
User currently offlineJamesbuk From United Kingdom, joined May 2005, 3968 posts, RR: 4
Reply 8, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 7156 times:

Another question guys,

Now if i turn my radio onto AM mode, would i be able to pick up ATC? or do they have some sort of blocker to stop this?

Rgds --James--



You cant have your cake and eat it... What the hells the point in having it then!!!
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17172 posts, RR: 66
Reply 9, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 4 hours ago) and read 7150 times:

Quoting Jamesbuk (Reply 8):
Now if i turn my radio onto AM mode, would i be able to pick up ATC? or do they have some sort of blocker to stop this?

If you can receive the correct frequencies, sure. There is no specific blocker in any radio equipment I have heard of.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineZenarcade From Canada, joined Nov 2006, 85 posts, RR: 0
Reply 10, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 7133 times:

I have heard something about all transmissions going digital soon. Is this true?

Adam



If a plane falls on the tarmac and no one is there, does it make any sound? - Starlionblue
User currently offlineKELPkid From United States of America, joined Nov 2005, 6428 posts, RR: 3
Reply 11, posted (7 years 11 months 3 weeks 6 days 3 hours ago) and read 7130 times:

Quoting Jamesbuk (Reply 8):
Another question guys,

Now if i turn my radio onto AM mode, would i be able to pick up ATC? or do they have some sort of blocker to stop this?

Rgds --James--

Air band uses AM modulation, not FM (unlike most other VHF communications...)

AM will overdrive the FM filtration circuits, and work it's way into the amplifier section, so you will get (somewhat distorted, but still readable) audio...as a matter of fact, many scanners take advantage of this phenomena when receiving the VHF air band frequencies Basically, the manufacturers don't want to engineer a small AM demodulation (which would make the unit more costly to mass produce) section into their scanners when it covers such a small portion of the VHF frequency band (which is why air band sounds so crappy on a cheap scanner). Air band sounds much cleaner on a genuine airband radio than it does on many radio scanners for this reason. Sporty's pilot shop sells a $99 desktop airband scanner, but I have no idea what the audio is like (i.e. if it allows the FM filter to be overdriven, or uses a dedicated AM demodulation circuit).

EDIT: if you want a cheap, homemade airband scanner, purchase a walkman-type AM/FM radio (with an analog slider type tuner), and open the case. Find the inductor coils, little tiny coils of wire (used for filtration Wink ), and stretch them apart with a jewelry screwdriver. This will allow airband harmonics to overload the FM broadcast band, and voila! a homemade, portable airband scanner. The audio will be pretty bad, but it works...I did this when I was in high school (late 1980's) to listen to ATC  Smile

[Edited 2006-12-28 19:46:32]


Celebrating the birth of KELPkidJR on August 5, 2009 :-)
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Why Is There Still Aircraft Radio Splutter?
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Naming Of Aircraft - Is It Still Done? posted Sun Dec 25 2005 10:49:50 by Julesmusician
Aircraft Lavs (!) - Is There A Ratio? posted Sun Nov 21 2004 05:42:31 by DBCooper
ATR 42/72 - Why Is The Cargo Bin In Front? posted Sun Jul 9 2006 06:35:24 by N353SK
757 And 767 RB211 Is There Any Difference In Size? posted Mon Jun 19 2006 14:38:00 by Edumotoki
Wake Turbulence - Is There A Sop Or Qrh Procedure? posted Thu Jun 8 2006 20:23:26 by JulianUK
Why Is The TF-34 Such A Low Powered Engine? posted Sat Apr 15 2006 05:16:18 by 747400sp
Why Is 737's Nose Wheel So Tiny? posted Tue Mar 21 2006 06:49:45 by Lehpron
What Material Is Used For Aircraft Engines? posted Sat Dec 24 2005 19:48:06 by YYZACGUY
Why Is The Gear Called Main Landing Gear? posted Tue Dec 13 2005 03:02:52 by Airfoilsguy
Why Air Traffic Ask Aircraft Type When They Know posted Sun Nov 27 2005 21:25:39 by Julesmusician

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format