Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
"Q" Technology Onboard The Dash8  
User currently offlineUairFokker From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 12 hours ago) and read 2869 times:

I am aware that the Dash8 Q400, to reduce noise and vibration, has a complex system of computers who meaure the vibrations and make "counter vibrations" that neutralize the original ones, providing a smooth ride.

Now, my question. All this process, doesn´t stresses the airframe? Doesn´t the Q400 need special care for all this extra stress?

Only a qestion it occured to me this afternoon, and supposed you would know and will be happy to answer.

Thanks!

7 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineSK A340 From Sweden, joined Mar 2000, 845 posts, RR: 2
Reply 1, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 8 hours ago) and read 2837 times:

The SAAB 340 and/or 2000 has it as well and my physics professor told us that it has some kind of "speakers" that emits the "counter waves"/"counter sound" approx. at the level of the passenger's ears. If you would crawl down to the floor the noise would be much higher there. I'm sure though that someone can explain this much better.

/Micke


User currently offlineN231YE From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 2, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 7 hours ago) and read 2818 times:

Quoting SK A340 (Reply 1):
The SAAB 340 and/or 2000 has it as well and my physics professor told us that it has some kind of "speakers" that emits the "counter waves"/"counter sound" approx. at the level of the passenger's ears.

That is similar, if not the same, as Active Noise Reduction technology found in headsets. In these headsets, the system "listens" for noise and then emits inverse sound waves. When the inverse and normal waves meet, they cancel each other out (distructive interference), causing a reduction in noise.

However, I do remember reading that the DHC-8 Q400 had "counter-vibrators" too, and that question is still open.

http://www.q400.com/q400/en/quiet.jsp#nvs

http://www.ultraquiet.com/

[Edited 2007-01-10 16:43:09]

User currently offlineUairFokker From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 3, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 4 days 6 hours ago) and read 2801 times:

Thanks for your replies. The website is very interesting... in fact, all those "vibrations", "counter-vibrations", etc... seem painful for the airframe.

User currently offlineTurkee From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 13 hours ago) and read 2703 times:

Those Dash-8s will take anything though, vibrations or not!

User currently offlineStrathpeffer From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2007, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 5, posted (7 years 9 months 3 weeks 3 days 11 hours ago) and read 2687 times:

I would argue that NVS, which does indeed work on an identical principle to the headphones, reduces the damaging effects of vibration stress on the airframe because the the 'mirror' vibrations created by the dampers cancel out the original ones from the engines and props.

Think about it this way:

Listening to headphones loud harms your hearing. If your anticipated outcome re. NVS is true then we would predict noise cancelling headphones caused even more harm. This is not the case at all - the overall result is significantly reduced noise NOT more noise added and as a result of eliminating the background you can reduce the chance of damaging your eardrums by setting your music to a lower volume.

As an aside, on a FlyBE Q400 trip from ABZ to BHD a year or so ago the system must have been inoperative because the noise and vibration was staggering. I have always thought these birds are very pleasant on short hops around the UK - but this is certainly not so when NVS is off.

However A Q400 with NVS off is still much better than Logi's Saabs...  

PJ

[Edited 2007-01-11 12:00:20]

[Edited 2007-01-11 12:01:26]


Another Technical Problem?
User currently offlineJcs17 From United States of America, joined Jun 2001, 8065 posts, RR: 39
Reply 6, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 15 hours ago) and read 2499 times:

I was on a USAirways Express Dash 8-200 (non Q-series) a couple of weeks ago. Once in flight, I put my noise-cancelling headphones on to listen to my iPod, and I got significant interference in them. It was only once I switched them off that the interference stopped. I figured the a/c's noise-cancellation system (if the older DH8s even have them?) was causing the interference. Was this assumption correct or do the older Dash 8s not even have noice-cancelling technology?


America's chickens are coming home to rooooost!
User currently offlineStrathpeffer From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2007, 79 posts, RR: 0
Reply 7, posted (7 years 9 months 2 weeks 5 days 12 hours ago) and read 2484 times:

Reviewing prompotional literature from the manufacturer suggests that non-Q Dash 8s don't have an active noise and vibration supression system - I'm willing to be corrected on this because the brochures are not very specific.

I think they are fitted with a passive system though - dampers and the like that are turned to a fixed frequency; unlike on the Q aircraft, where the dampers are constantly 'retuned' to match the current conditions.

PJ



Another Technical Problem?
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic "Q" Technology Onboard The Dash8
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
First "jetliner" To Go Across The Atlantic? posted Tue Feb 19 2002 12:59:17 by Gloster
"Got The Good Stuff Onboard?" posted Fri Mar 12 2004 20:08:21 by CFIcraigAPA
What Made The L1011 Tristar A "maintainance Hog"? posted Mon Dec 11 2006 01:26:28 by Jimbobjoe
"descend On The Ils" Question posted Mon Sep 25 2006 21:42:28 by JulianUK
"I Have The Plane" Still Used In Flight Training? posted Fri Jun 2 2006 09:46:11 by Varig767
Do Airports "grit" The Runway? posted Sat Mar 4 2006 08:13:16 by Goinv
Why The "wheel" On Landing Gear Levers? posted Fri Mar 3 2006 11:52:41 by Slinker
The Effects Of The 12 Vmc On A "normal" Light Twin posted Mon Feb 27 2006 15:08:07 by NorCal
Where's The 400 HZ "hum"? posted Wed Feb 22 2006 22:19:28 by KELPkid
"Flaring" The Nose During Landing - Who Does It? posted Wed Feb 15 2006 11:05:17 by Planeboy

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format