Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Packs - Norm Vs. A/B  
User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 43
Posted (7 years 8 months 5 days 14 hours ago) and read 1395 times:

Hi guys,

With the 744 ECS and checklists in mind, the three air conditioning packs are usually set to either "OFF" or "NORM". However, there are two other notches on the dial for "A" and "B", and I'm wondering what they are.

My understanding is that the "A" and "B" systems are just another example of redundancy in the cockpit. For example, in "NORM" mode, the pack controller automatically selects either the "A" or "B" system "on alternating flights" (got that from an AOM, which I found to be pretty interesting), but you can also use the other two modes to specify either system as the primary and have the other stand by as a backup.

Is that really all it is, though? Why would one want to (or need to, aside from a known faulty pack) submit their own preference for A vs. B and not have the system make the selection automatically?

And no, not that A vs. B...

Enlighten me!

Thanks,

Brian


What the FUTT?
3 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineJetMech From Australia, joined Mar 2006, 2699 posts, RR: 53
Reply 1, posted (7 years 8 months 5 days 13 hours ago) and read 1383 times:

G'day Brian  Smile,

I think that the A/B selection is for the pack controller only, not the pack itself. In normal operations, all three packs on a 744 will be operating. Each of these three packs is made up of one set of machinery only, that is, there is not a separate set of machinery for the A and B selection. The redundancy in the pressurisation / air-conditioning system comes from having three separate packs. I don't remember the details, but there are either two controllers per pack or two separate "lanes" in the one pack controller box. I believe that the A/B selection allows the pilots to force the use of a particular pack controller or lane if the system is malfunctioning and does not correct itself.

Regards, JetMech



JetMech split the back of his pants. He can feel the wind in his hair.
User currently offlineFutterman From United States of America, joined Sep 2003, 1301 posts, RR: 43
Reply 2, posted (7 years 8 months 5 days 3 hours ago) and read 1331 times:

Thanks for the clarification, JetMech.

Quoting JetMech (Reply 1):
The redundancy in the pressurisation / air-conditioning system comes from having three separate packs. I don't remember the details, but there are either two controllers per pack or two separate "lanes" in the one pack controller box.

I just came across some more information, and there don't seem to be two controllers per pack. Just two controllers, period, each with three channels for the three packs.

Quoting 2000 Air New Zealand 747-400 ZK-SUI A.O.M. - page 293:
...The packs are controlled by two identical pack controllers, A and B. Each controller has three separate channels, one for each pack. Control of the packs switches automatically to the other controller at touchdown. If a controller detects a fault in a pack channel, control of the respective pack switches to the other controller...

So it looks to me that there is redundancy on both levels. Three packs, yes, but the fact that there are two controllers - as well as the fact that you only need one, hence the automatic selection and the A/B switches - looks to me like another instance of "better safe than sorry".

As far as when one would opt for the A/B switch versus "NORM":

Quoting 2000 Air New Zealand 747-400 ZK-SUI A.O.M. - page 294:
...Pack control, fault detection, and overheat protection are all automatic. When an overheat or controller fault is detected, the respective pack valve closes resulting in a pack shut down....If a pack controller does not switch automatically to the other controller, selecting A or B manually selects the respective controller when the Trim Air switch is ON....

But how does the crew know which controller is faulty for a specific pack? Is there an appropriate EICAS alert?


Brian



What the FUTT?
User currently offlineBoeingFixer From Canada, joined Jul 2005, 534 posts, RR: 0
Reply 3, posted (7 years 8 months 4 days 23 hours ago) and read 1307 times:

Quoting Futterman (Reply 2):
As far as when one would opt for the A/B switch versus "NORM":



Quoting Futterman (Reply 2):
But how does the crew know which controller is faulty for a specific pack? Is there an appropriate EICAS alert?

The crew will get an EICAS message of "PACK 1, 2, 3" which is an advisory level message alerting the crew to one of the following: "Pack controller fault, or pack operation fault, or pack overheat, or pack 2 shutdown with either cabin pressure relief valve open." The crew then has to refer to their QRH Non-Normal checklists for the Air-Sytstems and the PACK 1,2,3 EICAS message. This will help them isolate the problem and indicate to the crew which controller they should be using or if the pack needs to be turned off.

Under normal circumstances, the system is left in NORM.

Cheers,

John



Cheers, John YYC
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Packs - Norm Vs. A/B
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
US Ramtaf Vs. NWS Forecast posted Sat Feb 3 2007 03:53:29 by Allstarflyer
A343 VS MD11ER posted Fri Jan 26 2007 08:35:28 by Asianguy767
Nose Down Vs Nose Up Approaches posted Thu Jan 18 2007 07:22:19 by Aaden
Pilot Vs Mechanic (not Serious!) posted Wed Jan 10 2007 20:36:27 by Ryangooner
BAe 146/ RJ Vs 737 Classic Which Burn More Fuel? posted Tue Jan 2 2007 00:04:00 by 747400sp
Drift Down Net Vs Gross Gradients posted Mon Jan 1 2007 13:15:13 by Slz396
Production Line Work Vs. Line Maintenance posted Sun Dec 31 2006 01:37:47 by Turbonytro
Airplane Vs. Helicopter Flying posted Sat Dec 30 2006 08:39:39 by Jawed
Kssu Vs. Atlas Config For DC-10s posted Wed Dec 27 2006 07:15:14 by MD11Fanatic
Fuel/Cost Per Seat: 737 Vs. Widebodies? posted Fri Dec 15 2006 05:01:09 by DfwRevolution

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format