Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
Boeing 787 Bolted Structural Repairs  
User currently offlineRheinbote From Germany, joined May 2006, 1973 posts, RR: 52
Posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days 5 hours ago) and read 7656 times:

picking up from a few earlier threads on 787 composite structure repairs...

Some fellow posters insisted that structural repairs will be of the bonded type predominantly, with bolted repairs only in case of near-catastrophic damage.

I found a nice presentation by Boeing on this topic, which is publically available here:

Goto page 17 for pictures of sample repairs methods as applied to one of the 787 test barrels.

[Edited 2007-03-15 17:51:51]

3 replies: All unread, jump to last
User currently offlineMolykote From United States of America, joined Aug 2005, 1344 posts, RR: 15
Reply 1, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 4 days ago) and read 7523 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

Great. Thank you for sharing.

Trim the link for some other good presentations.

Speedtape - The aspirin of aviation!
User currently offlineSEPilot From United States of America, joined Dec 2006, 7559 posts, RR: 51
Reply 2, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days 9 hours ago) and read 7394 times:

Having done aircraft repair on light aircraft, I think that CFRP is going to prove to be much more durable and easier to repair than aluminum. One of the difficult aspects of aluminum structures is that aluminum bends, and an impact in one area can cause distortions far from where the impact occurred, which is often impossible to completely correct; one example was a 172 that had suffered a very hard landing years earlier and showed no external scars, but the floor stringers to which the main landing gear was attached were noticeably distorted. Complete repair would have been prohibitively expensive. CFRP, on the other hand, will ultimately break but not permanently bend. This actually makes assessing and repairing damage easier, as long as it can be thoroughly inspected (which the FAA will require in any case.) I believe once the mechanics get accustomed to CFRP they will never want to see another aluminum airliner. I have also done a fair amount of fiberglass work, and while it can be messy it is not difficult and with care repairs can be made that are as strong as the original and virtually undetectable.

The problem with making things foolproof is that fools are so doggone ingenious...Dan Keebler
User currently offlineContnlEliteCMH From United States of America, joined Mar 2005, 1486 posts, RR: 45
Reply 3, posted (9 years 2 months 2 weeks 3 days ago) and read 7312 times:

Did anybody notice that on slide 13 they show a clear advantage for CFRP vs. aluminum for a nominal lightning strike? The issue of lightning has been bandied about this site for the past three years. Some of those concerns deal with systemic dissipation of the lightning charge; others have dealt with damage at the point of the strike. According to this slide, CFRP is clearly superior, resulting in superficial damage which can be deferred for repair, compared to a perforated aluminmum panel which must be dispatched for repair.

These slides are *excellent*.

Christianity. Islam. Hinduism. Anthropogenic Global Warming. All are matters of faith!
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic Boeing 787 Bolted Structural Repairs
No username? Sign up now!

Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)

Similar topics:More similar topics...
787 Fuselage Repairs posted Fri Dec 16 2005 10:52:59 by PurdueAv2003
787 Flightdeck Tour Up At Boeing Website posted Mon Sep 12 2005 08:35:38 by Pilotdude09
Boeing In 787 Software Deal With HCL Tech posted Tue Feb 8 2005 22:49:56 by Sunnyb
Boeing 737-300, Flaps Slightly Retract? posted Mon Mar 5 2007 00:12:24 by CoolGuy
747-8 And 787 Commonality posted Thu Mar 1 2007 21:57:14 by AF022
Boeing Saftey Facts Incorrect? posted Tue Feb 27 2007 20:01:48 by Iboam
787 Windows-Complete Darkness? posted Thu Feb 1 2007 22:40:38 by Mham001
Static/dynamic Structural Tests For Certification posted Tue Jan 30 2007 21:04:16 by Rheinbote
Boeing 757 Transatlantic Westbound Ops posted Sat Jan 27 2007 08:36:23 by LAXspotter
Is 787 To Have Centre Gear? posted Mon Jan 15 2007 23:18:44 by Ruscoe

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format