Sponsor Message:
Aviation Technical / Operations Forum
My Starred Topics | Profile | New Topic | Forum Index | Help | Search 
A340 Pilots - Comments Wanted (for School Project)  
User currently offlineFlyInBack From United States of America, joined Sep 2006, 23 posts, RR: 0
Posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 11 hours ago) and read 3949 times:

Could any pilots out there familiar with the A340 (any version) give me comments regarding the aircraft? I'm interested in hearing both the pro's and the con's that you see with the plane (things that it does well, things it lacks at, etc.) Perhaps you could compare it to any other aircraft you've flown if possible. I'm not trying to find out if this plane is 'better than another', so please don't let this get into an A vs. B war. We have to do a report on the plane along with some basic calculations, and I thought it would be really cool to have some opinions of those who have flown the aircraft in there. Anyone else with some comments regarding the aircraft would be appreciated too! Thanks in advance!

Specifically, we need to address 'for what purpose or mission was it designed', 'what has been its history and how well has it performed', and 'what lessons have been learned (if any) as a result of its performance history'. Of course, many of these questions have subjective answers, which is why I would like to mention a variety of opinions in the paper.

FlyInBack

11 replies: All unread, jump to last
 
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17015 posts, RR: 67
Reply 1, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 2 days 1 hour ago) and read 3847 times:

Quoting FlyInBack (Thread starter):
'for what purpose or mission was it designed'

Long haul.  Wink

Seriously though, the 330 and 340 are different versions of the same aircraft. I don't know if a book is in the budget but this one should be very helpful http://www.amazon.com/Airbus-A340-A3...TF8&s=books&qid=1176643351&sr=8-11



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineGofly From United Kingdom, joined Dec 2004, 1727 posts, RR: 38
Reply 2, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 23 hours ago) and read 3809 times:
Support Airliners.net - become a First Class Member!

You would be better heading off to somewhere like PPRuNe, you'll find more pilots who have flown the A340 there than on A.net - careful where and how you ask though, they're very specific with their forums.

-Gofly



Living the high life on my ex-Airliners.net Moderator pension...
User currently offlineZeke From Hong Kong, joined Dec 2006, 8996 posts, RR: 75
Reply 3, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 16 hours ago) and read 3679 times:

Quoting FlyInBack (Thread starter):
'for what purpose or mission was it designed'

TA11-100, 230 pax, 17 LD3s, 6830 nm (340-200 239 pax 26 LD3, 8000 nm)
TA11-200, 270 pax, 24 LD3s, 6830 nm (340-300 295 pax 33 LD3, 6400 nm)

Quoting FlyInBack (Thread starter):
'what has been its history and how well has it performed'

Does its role well with the same seat mile costs as a 744, over the same sort of distances. Good for long thin routes.

They are in service with 37 operators, the same number of operators the 777 is on service with.

Quoting FlyInBack (Thread starter):
'what lessons have been learned (if any) as a result of its performance history'

To push engine manufacturers harder for better engine performance.

In terms of book suggestions for you, try http://www.amazon.com/Airbus-Industr...125?ie=UTF8&qid=1176674717&sr=11-1



We are addicted to our thoughts. We cannot change anything if we cannot change our thinking – Santosh Kalwar
User currently offlineOceansWorld From , joined Dec 1969, posts, RR:
Reply 4, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 3628 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 1):
Seriously though, the 330 and 340 are different versions of the same aircraft. I don't know if a book is in the budget but this one should be very helpful http://www.amazon.com/Airbus-A340-A3...=8-11

That's a really good book indeed. Both authors work for Flight International.


Here's another interesting one.

http://www.amazon.com/Airbus-A330-A3...458?ie=UTF8&qid=1176643351&sr=8-11


User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17015 posts, RR: 67
Reply 5, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week 15 hours ago) and read 3412 times:

Quoting Zeke (Reply 3):
To push engine manufacturers harder for better engine performance.

No kidding. There must have been a lot of ulcers at Airbus when SuperFan was cancelled.



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineMighluss From Spain, joined Oct 2001, 948 posts, RR: 8
Reply 6, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week ago) and read 3296 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 5):
SuperFan was cancelled

I've never heard about it... could you elaborate?? maybe a higher by pass ratio CFM?

(A google search brought me plenty of Fan Clubs... Big grin )



Miquel.
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17015 posts, RR: 67
Reply 7, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week ago) and read 3281 times:

Quoting Mighluss (Reply 6):
Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 5):
SuperFan was cancelled

I've never heard about it... could you elaborate?? maybe a higher by pass ratio CFM?

Well, it's not a fan club member.

SuperFan was the proposed powerplant for the 340. It had a geared, variable pitch (?) fan with very high bypass. Very innovative. Fuel savings were estimated at 20% over comparable contemporary engines. However, IAE dropped the ball late in the game (citing technical risks) and Airbus had to switch to the less powerful CFM56.

[Edited 2007-04-17 16:21:10]


"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
User currently offlineJetlagged From United Kingdom, joined Jan 2005, 2546 posts, RR: 24
Reply 8, posted (7 years 4 months 1 week ago) and read 3273 times:

Quoting Mighluss (Reply 6):
I've never heard about it... could you elaborate?? maybe a higher by pass ratio CFM?

Superfan was a projected ultra high bypass ratio version of the IAE V2500, with a geared front fan. It never happened, leaving the A340 with only the less efficient alternative, the CFM56-5C.



The glass isn't half empty, or half full, it's twice as big as it needs to be.
User currently offlineFerroviarius From Norway, joined Mar 2007, 225 posts, RR: 0
Reply 9, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 18 hours ago) and read 2754 times:

Quoting Starlionblue (Reply 7):
SuperFan was the proposed powerplant for the 340. It had a geared, variable pitch (?) fan with very high bypass. Very innovative. Fuel savings were estimated at 20% over comparable contemporary engines. However, IAE dropped the ball late in the game (citing technical risks) and Airbus had to switch to the less powerful CFM56.



Quoting Jetlagged (Reply 8):
Superfan was a projected ultra high bypass ratio version of the IAE V2500, with a geared front fan. It never happened, leaving the A340 with only the less efficient alternative, the CFM56-5C.

Perhaps some early 342s might once be re-engined with P&Ws new geared engines in statu nascendi. This is nothing but a bare speculation from my side. However, if it would happen and if P&Ws new engine would turn out to be at least as fuel economic as projected - and there might be all reason to expect that -, A342s and A343s would become even more efficient than they - arguably, I admit - are today.

Best,
Ferroviarius


User currently offlineLASOctoberB6 From Japan, joined Nov 2006, 2380 posts, RR: 1
Reply 10, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 13 hours ago) and read 2690 times:

Quoting Jetlagged (Reply 8):
the CFM56-5C.

isnt that similar to the 737 series? quite odd in my opionion....



[NOT IN SERVICE] {WEStJet}
User currently offlineStarlionblue From Greenland, joined Feb 2004, 17015 posts, RR: 67
Reply 11, posted (7 years 3 months 4 weeks 1 day 2 hours ago) and read 2580 times:

Quoting LASOctoberB6 (Reply 10):
Quoting Jetlagged (Reply 8):
the CFM56-5C.

isnt that similar to the 737 series? quite odd in my opionion....

The CFM56 series of engines powers quite a few aircraft. However, the engines within the family differ significantly. The -5C for th 340 has 31200-34000 lb of thrust, while the -7B, powering the 737NG, has 18500-27300b of thrust.

http://www.cfm56.com/index.php?level2=engines



"There are no stupid questions, but there are a lot of inquisitive idiots."
Top Of Page
Forum Index

Reply To This Topic A340 Pilots - Comments Wanted (for School Project)
Username:
No username? Sign up now!
Password: 


Forgot Password? Be reminded.
Remember me on this computer (uses cookies)
  • Tech/Ops related posts only!
  • Not Tech/Ops related? Use the other forums
  • No adverts of any kind. This includes web pages.
  • No hostile language or criticizing of others.
  • Do not post copyright protected material.
  • Use relevant and describing topics.
  • Check if your post already been discussed.
  • Check your spelling!
  • DETAILED RULES
Add Images Add SmiliesPosting Help

Please check your spelling (press "Check Spelling" above)


Similar topics:More similar topics...
Need Help For School Project - Costs Questions posted Tue Mar 27 2001 21:30:01 by Serendipitous
747 Vs A380-School Project; Need Help posted Tue Sep 19 2006 03:07:29 by Speedbird747BA
Any A340 Pilots Out There That Can Answer This? posted Fri Sep 16 2005 03:03:58 by Slarty
A330/A340 Pilots posted Mon May 12 2003 01:37:40 by Macmac76
Need Help On A School Project posted Thu Mar 27 2003 22:12:19 by AA61hvy
Suggestions For School Presentation On United posted Thu Mar 29 2001 19:56:36 by Serendipitous
Question For Actual A340 600 Pilots posted Tue Jun 20 2006 20:42:01 by Tarzanboy
A Question For COEx Pilots... posted Tue Mar 6 2007 16:46:45 by COA739ER
Questions I've Always Wanted The Answers For! posted Thu Mar 1 2007 13:20:41 by VS773ER
Questions For RR Equipped 757 Pilots posted Thu Jan 25 2007 19:41:06 by MD11Fanatic

Sponsor Message:
Printer friendly format